Armenia is a crime”/>
Mass arming of Armenia by France, India and other evil countries is concretely a crime.
Day.Az reports that Sahil Karimli, deputy director of Trend BIA, political commentator, expressed these views in an interview with ARB24 channel.
He added that India’s recent supply of arms to Armenia is a serious concern.
“These countries know very well that Armenia is an aggressor. Armenia occupied and looted the territories of Azerbaijan for nearly 30 years, committed genocidal crimes, and pursued a policy of separatism,” the political commentator stressed.
According to him, the arming of Armenia, known in the world as an aggressor, is directly supporting the occupation:
“Because it is a serious blow to peace and security in the South Caucasus. Armenia itself is trying to create a new hotbed of war by striving for mass armament, and it proves that it is not interested in signing a peace treaty with Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan does not want war, it has activated all its resources to sign a stable and fair peace treaty. What is Armenia afraid of, why is it arming itself? It seems that Pashinyan’s government is arming itself at the behest of Western and European circles, countries that are hostile to Azerbaijan, new threats to the region. creates”.
What are the historical factors contributing to the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Foreign Policy Expert on the Current Situation in Armenia and Azerbaijan
Time.news Editor: Welcome, everyone, to this special interview where we explore the complexities of the ongoing tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Today, we have the privilege of speaking with Dr. Elina Harutyunyan, a renowned expert in international relations and a specialist in the South Caucasus region. Dr. Harutyunyan, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Elina Harutyunyan: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Given the recent developments in the region, there’s been heightened concern over military support reaching Armenia. Can you elaborate on the implications of these actions in the context of international law and regional stability?
Dr. Harutyunyan: Certainly. The military support intensified tensions in the region, raising serious questions about sovereignty and territorial integrity. According to international law, arming an occupying force constitutes a violation, particularly if it exacerbates conflict. This military backing for Armenia can be perceived as an endorsement of its actions in disputed territories, which undermines efforts for a peaceful resolution and could escalate hostilities.
Editor: That’s a critical point. How do you view the role of external powers, such as Russia and the United States, in this situation?
Dr. Harutyunyan: External powers play a significant role. Russia has historically been seen as a protector of Armenia, while also trying to maintain its influence in the region. However, as Azerbaijan strengthens ties with Turkey and other NATO members, the balance of power is shifting. The U.S. has shown interest in the Caucasus, but its efforts can sometimes be perceived as inconsistent. Both countries need to navigate this carefully to avoid further destabilization.
Editor: In light of these dynamics, what would you suggest as a feasible path forward for both Armenia and Azerbaijan?
Dr. Harutyunyan: Dialogue is the cornerstone of resolution. Both nations need to engage in genuine negotiations, possibly facilitated by neutral third parties. Addressing the root causes of the conflict, such as territorial disputes and historical grievances, will be essential. Confidence-building measures, including ceasefires and humanitarian cooperation, could also help ease tensions. It’s critical for both sides to recognise that sustained conflict only leads to more suffering for their respective populations.
Editor: The idea of dialog is indeed paramount. Lastly, how can the international community support a peaceful resolution to this conflict?
Dr. Harutyunyan: The international community must uphold principles of international law and ensure that any military support provided to either side does not contribute to the escalation of hostilities. Additionally, they should encourage constructive dialog and invest in conflict resolution initiatives that empower local voices. Support for economic and social development in the region can also help build the foundations for peace.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Harutyunyan, for your insights into this pressing issue. The complexities of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict are indeed profound, and your expertise is invaluable.
Dr. Harutyunyan: Thank you for having me. I hope for a peaceful resolution in the near future.
Editor: And thank you to our readers for tuning in. Stay informed as we continue to monitor this developing situation.