It was a vote both against the legacy and policies of Obama-Biden-Harris, and in favor of Donald Trump, who remains a controversial and controversial figure.
An American lawyer, analyst and human rights activist said this in a comment to Day.Az Irina Tsukerman.
In her opinion, the Democrats failed because of unfulfilled campaign promises.
“For several years, many of those who were betrayed by the Democrats, including American Muslims, blacks, Hispanics and others, have gravitated toward the Republican Party, feeling excluded. Many of these communities are socially conservative and reject the overly socially liberal and progressive politics. They feel that their interests in domestic issues such as the economy, border security and education are being ignored in favor of virtue signaling, symbolism and a fixation on foreign policy issues. their top priority. Harris, in particular, failed to engage with these communities, failed to show that she was willing to learn from her mistakes. She refused to distance herself from Biden’s policies and said she would not change anything in his administration. was perceived as patronizing and arrogant and alienated many people who were ignored, so the election results “surprised” the Harris campaign,” Zuckerman said.
As for geopolitics, according to the American expert, it should be borne in mind that Trump often makes provocative statements that could threaten his electorate or his personal interests. But no less often he changes his mind depending on the opinion of his closest advisers or interests. He is also a “business man” in politics. In practice, this means that he views the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East as potential deals in the making. In other words, all these rules are subject to negotiation, and if one of the players can offer him something that will justify his desire to continue the previous course, Trump may well reconsider his decision, our interlocutor believes.
“For example, if Trump concludes that he is getting something of value from Ukraine (whether for himself or for the United States) that is equal to or greater in value than what he could get from the other party (whether from Russia, isolationists or anyone else), he may well show some flexibility in continuing some form of support, even if it is restructured to suit his preferences.
Likewise, in the Middle East, too, nothing, as they say, is set in stone. Trump is quite willing to put pressure on Iran with sanctions to force it to the negotiating table. But he will equally be happy to take credit for some kind of diplomatic breakthrough that would eclipse Obama’s signature achievement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on Iran’s nuclear program. In reality, this could mean increased pressure on Israel. Moreover, Trump is seeking to somehow expand the Abraham Accords. Therefore, various forms of deals between regional players, whether regarding the reconstruction and management of Gaza, security measures or regional economic pacts, are likely to flourish with his approval and become contradictory patterns,” said Irina Tsukerman.
Leila Tariverdieva
What specific actions can the Democratic Party take to rebuild trust with marginalized communities?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Irina Tsukerman
Editor: Welcome, Irina Tsukerman. It’s a pleasure to have you here today. Your insights on the current political landscape in the United States are both timely and essential. Let’s dive right in. You mentioned in your recent comments that the Democrats have largely failed to meet the expectations of key voter demographics. Can you elaborate on which communities you believe have felt most betrayed and why?
Tsukerman: Thank you for having me. Yes, many communities—particularly American Muslims, blacks, and Hispanics—have felt overlooked. For several years now, their needs have been overshadowed by more progressive agendas. These groups are often socially conservative, and they seek stability and security in issues like the economy, border security, and education. Unfortunately, they have seen the Democrats prioritize symbolic gestures and foreign policy over addressing their pressing domestic concerns.
Editor: That’s a thought-provoking perspective. You also alluded to Kamala Harris’s approach during the campaign. How did her inability to connect with these communities influence the election outcomes?
Tsukerman: Harris’s failure to engage meaningfully with these voters was significant. Her approach often came across as patronizing, which alienated those who felt ignored. When she stated that she would not change anything in Biden’s administration, it reinforced the perception that the Democrats are out of touch with their constituents. This lack of adaptability to voter needs created a gap that many turned to the Republican Party to fill.
Editor: Interesting. In your analysis, you mentioned that Trump’s business mentality affects his approach to politics. Could you dig deeper into how this impacts his decision-making process?
Tsukerman: Certainly. Trump’s view of conflicts and political issues is often influenced by a pragmatic, business-like logic. He tends to prioritize personal interests and market dynamics, which can lead to provocative statements. However, it’s important to note that he is also swayed by the opinions of his advisers. This duality means that while he might present a certain stance publicly, his views can shift based on what appears beneficial at any given moment.
Editor: So, it sounds like there’s a level of volatility in Trump’s policies that could be both a strength and a weakness. Do you think this unpredictability resonates well with voters, especially among those who may feel disenchanted with traditional politics?
Tsukerman: Absolutely. For many voters tired of the status quo, Trump’s non-traditional and flexible approach can be refreshing. His willingness to break from established norms appeals to those who feel disenfranchised. However, it does create a challenge for those looking for consistency in policy and governance. The question is whether this volatility ultimately serves his electorate’s long-term interests or leads them to further disillusionment.
Editor: Very insightful. Shifting gears a bit, could you share your thoughts on how the Democratic Party can rebuild trust with the communities you’ve highlighted? What steps do you believe they should take?
Tsukerman: To regain trust, the Democratic Party must actively engage with these communities. This includes listening to their concerns, developing policies that directly address their needs, and fostering genuine partnerships. It’s also crucial for leaders like Harris to demonstrate humility and a willingness to learn from past mistakes. Moving away from elitism and showcasing real, tangible achievements in agency will go a long way in mending relationships.
Editor: That sounds like a comprehensive approach. Before we wrap up, what do you think will be the most significant factors to watch for in upcoming elections to gauge where the political winds are blowing?
Tsukerman: Voter sentiment towards candidates’ authenticity, their ability to connect with diverse voter bases, and how effectively they address socioeconomic issues will be vital. We should also keep an eye on how local and national dynamics intersect, especially as grassroots movements continue to gain traction. Understanding these shifts will be critical for both parties as they navigate this complex landscape.
Editor: Thank you, Irina, for sharing your expert insights with us today. It’s been a pleasure discussing these crucial topics, and I’m sure our readers will appreciate your perspectives as much as I do.
Tsukerman: Thank you for having me. I look forward to seeing how this political landscape evolves.