When the police phenomenon takes root in the mind of the ruler, a stage of misery and despair begins to creep into the souls of the citizens. This phenomenon is not only related to the nature of the ruling system, but also to the personality of the ruler himself. Even in democratic countries, the ruler (or the elected prime minister) may become a dictator and seek to deal with citizens with a police mentality. Some of them even sought to change the law to allow him to run again because his country’s law does not allow more than two sessions. The ruler himself may not be strong in personality or the capabilities of his country,but despite his pretense of strength,he feels internal weakness and derives his strength from relying on external support. This support is not available without a price, and this price is paid by the dictator by compromising on his country’s sovereignty and independence.He has no objection to allowing military bases to be built on his lands, as he sees them as a source of personal security for himself and those with him. Such a ruler does not care about the interests of his country or its people, and all his concern in life is to pretend to be imaginary greatness on the one hand, and to be reassured about the continuation of his rule conversely, and to mix with other rulers who are stronger than him in terms of strength of personality and the material capabilities available to him. Our Islamic history confirms this phenomenon over the centuries. How many have shed blood to survive, and how hard are the hearts of those who built their kingdom on the skulls of innocents.What a horrific form of torture and abuse they practiced against their opponents.
Yesterday, the tyrant of Bahrain ordered the arrest of an honorable national activist because he expressed an honorable national position in support of his brothers in Lebanon and Palestine and denounced the massacres committed by the Israeli occupation forces against the two countries and their people. Professor Fadel Abbas,who has been repeatedly arrested as the blessed 2011 revolution,spoke only about the issue that occupies the nation’s minds from east to west. Is ther an honorable Arab or Muslim whose heart does not bleed at the massacres committed there? Can anyone remain silent about the terrible destruction that affected residential towers in Gaza, beirut, and southern Lebanon? Can someone close their eyes to repeated scenes of children pulling body parts from under the rubble? What about the widespread famine in Gaza? How can a person live comfortably when he knows that there are people of his own skin and humanity who do not have access to pure drinking water or the livelihood that sustains his needs? The hearts of many have become calcified, and these scenes no longer arouse in them feelings of compassion, pity, and sympathy. rather, there are many who avoid watching the news broadcast in audio and video so as not to “sour” their mood. This has nothing to do with humanity, but rather it is the result of unrighteous actions, as stated in the Holy Qur’an: No, but what they were doing saw in their hearts. Many have become accustomed to a carefree life that does not involve toil, effort, goal, noble purpose, or sense of obligation, which is repeatedly mentioned in the Holy Qur’an: Did you think that We created you in vain and that you would not be returned to Us? Let us all know that there is death and life after it and a reckoning before the Lord of the Worlds: stop them, they are responsible. It is indeed a responsibility to care for others, as this is the foundation of humanity and belonging to God and Islam.
A tyrant with a seal on his heart who derives his power from the support of foreigners and not from his own people and his own strength. Here he wanders among the British official institutions, protected by its security services, and hosted by her royal family, who lives in luxury provided by tax money. It is indeed no secret that a person suffers from a deficiency when he is overwhelmed with joy and happiness sitting next to the former queen at the Windsor Horse Race, or walking with the current king at the gates of the royal palaces, fleeing from the cheers of his opponents who seek to convey their voice to the world about the injustice, persecution and abuse that the people of Bahrain are suffering from. It is indeed one of the historical contradictions in this world, where the indigenous people of the Earth live with very modest standards of living, and suffer from poverty, high prices, the high cost of living, and the dominance of the security and intelligence services that count their breath, movements, and residence.But these oppressed people enjoy dignity and pride, and they derive from the soil of their homeland what raises their heads and provides them with
they are happy with their homeland, their faith, their dignity, and their brotherhood, seeking freedom, sacrificing everything for it. And how many of them saw their youth as martyrs on their long path towards liberating the land and homeland and rebuilding the country after decades of systematic destruction practiced by the ruling gang for decades. As for the oppressive Al-Khalifi, he lives in his ivory palaces, far from the people and the homeland. he does not have feelings of love for the land he occupied, nor affection towards those on whom he imposed himself as a partner in the land, nor the humanity that makes his appearance a source of happiness for others.He could not gain the respect of the people he ruled by force and dominance, nor his neighbors, who considered him a burden on them after he became an outcast by the people. As for his Western supporters, they see him as a weak ruler who sits on a fragile ruling system that depends for its survival on Western support, represented by the military bases on the country’s soil and the military fleets that ply the waters of the Gulf and take Bahrain’s ports as main stops on their journeys. A regime like this does not deserve to survive, especially with the presence of a conscious people characterized by vigilance and feelings of dignity who refuse to bow down to their executioners.His detainees are proudly proud behind bars, even after nearly fourteen years, and their families refuse to beg the tyrant to release them, and their children are preparing to continue the path that their fathers and grandfathers took decades ago. This generational conflict worries the Khalifas and their supporters, and confirms that Bahrain is unable to submit, no matter how cruel its oppressive rulers are.
It can be said, with a great deal of confidence, that the Al-Khalifis have the largest experience in the field of arresting opponents among the Gulf states, but this long experience has proven the futility of arbitrary arrests and abuse of political detainees. Rather, it has contributed to a further deterioration of the political and security situation, and the Al-Khalifis have not become safer.As an inevitable result of the continued arbitrary arrest of citizens. They are still looking for “security” for their rule and family, and this will not be achieved for them. Security can only be achieved in an atmosphere of freedom, justice and the rule of law. If there was a rational person among the members of this unjust family,he would conclude that its policies towards citizens have failed,and that more failure will occur if its symbols do not stop practicing tyranny,injustice,and abuse. The current ruler does not seem to be less ignorant of the facts of reality and history, but perhaps he is the most stubborn, unjust, oppressive, oppressive, and sectarian. In the eyes of citizens, it has become a symbol of hatred, hatred and tension. His problem is that he is satisfied with the situation he is in that allows him to live a life of laziness and avoid “headache” by delegating his children to carry out the executive aspects of the burdens of governance. In this way, he believes he has controlled the situation and ensured the continuation of his rule and his family.He looks with one-eyed eyes at the experiences and lessons surrounding him that confirmed the inevitability of the disappearance of injustice and the oppressors, and the victory of the oppressed, especially if they belong to conscious peoples like the people of Bahrain.Therefore, it is expected that national activity for freedom and the end of the black Caliph era will escalate, especially with the continued imprisonment of the free and the innocent and the inevitability of the enforcement of divine laws, most notably the laws of dictation, succession, and the end of injustice.
Oh God, have mercy on our righteous martyrs, make them sincere with You, and release our prisoners, O Lord of the Worlds.
Ahrar Bahrain Islamic Movement
November 15, 2024
I’m sorry, but it seems that the article you provided is incomplete or missing. Please provide the full text you would like me to edit, and I’ll be happy to assist you.
What factors contribute too the psychological mindset of oppressive leaders in authoritarian regimes?
Time.News Interview: The Dynamics of Power adn Oppression with Dr. Samir al-Faris, Political Analyst
Time.News Editor: Welcome, Dr. al-Faris, and thank you for joining us today. Your insights into the complex relationship between rulers and their citizens, notably in the context of oppressive regimes, are invaluable. Today, I’d like to discuss the implications of a ruler’s psychology on governance, especially regarding the police mentality you mentioned.Can you elaborate on how this mentality manifests in both authoritarian and democratic contexts?
Dr.Samir al-Faris: Thank you for having me. The “police mentality” frequently enough arises when leaders prioritize control and suppression over genuine governance. Even in democracies, we can observe elected officials adopting authoritarian practices, largely driven by insecurity. They perceive dissent not as a challenge to engage with but as a threat to eliminate. This response is not only a political failure but a psychological one, reflecting their deep-rooted fears of inadequacy.When a ruler feels weak, they may resort to increasing military and police powers, effectively militarizing their governance.
Time.News Editor: Captivating point! you mentioned that some rulers seek external support to bolster their regime. How does this reliance affect a country’s sovereignty?
Dr. Samir al-Faris: It’s a troubling dynamic. When leaders depend on foreign powers for security,they often sacrifice their nation’s autonomy. This reliance creates a transactional relationship where external support comes at the cost of compromising national interests. Leaders may allow foreign military bases or adopt policies that cater to external demands rather than the needs of their citizens. Ultimately, it leads to a deeper disconnect between the ruler and the ruled and exacerbates existing issues of oppression and disenfranchisement.
Time.News Editor: You highlighted a recent case in Bahrain involving the arrest of activist Professor Fadel Abbas. What does this incident reveal about the state of civil liberties in such regimes?
Dr. Samir al-Faris: Professor Abbas’s arrest is emblematic of a broader pattern of silencing dissent. It underscores a systematic suppression of voices advocating for justice and human rights. In environments where public criticism can lead to severe repercussions, the space for meaningful dialogue shrinks dramatically.This incident also illuminates the emotional detachment of oppressive rulers from national issues. While ordinary citizens display compassion and solidarity with global crises, leaders insulated by power commit acts that contradict their people’s values, fostering resentment and further unrest.
Time.News Editor: You touched upon the desensitization of citizens in facing ongoing tragedies. How does this cultural shift occur, and what are its long-term implications?
Dr. Samir al-Faris: Desensitization often stems from persistent exposure to violence and suffering, leading to emotional fatigue. When individuals are bombarded with distressing news—like those coming from Gaza and Lebanon—it’s easier for them to disengage and adopt a more apathetic stance. the long-term implications can be dire; societies may become numb to injustice, suppressing their moral compass. It raises critical questions about collective duty and humanity’s duty to respond to suffering. When hearts grow cold,the potential for social movements and change diminishes considerably.
Time.News Editor: It’s a stark reality you present. And as we consider the future of such regimes, do you think there’s hope for genuine reform, or are we witnessing an certain cycle of oppression?
Dr. Samir al-Faris: Reform is challenging under oppressive regimes, especially when leadership is wrapped in self-preservation. Though, history shows examples of resilience and resistance from oppressed populations. Change often arises from the vrey despair that oppressive systems attempt to stifle. Young activists, individuals like Fadel Abbas, embody hope and the possibility of renewal.While the road may be long, as evidenced in many Arab Spring movements, the human desire for dignity, freedom, and justice is a powerful catalyst that can rewrite narratives—even in the face of overwhelming odds.
Time.News Editor: Thank you, Dr. al-Faris,for sharing your insights. It’s vital to understand these complexities to foster greater awareness and advocacy for those affected by such regimes.
Dr.Samir al-Faris: Thank you for this discussion. It’s essential to keep these dialogues alive to support those striving for justice and humanity.