2024-11-28 08:46:00
Repeal of the pension reform, acts… we no longer know how many. A new text that proposes returning to retirement at 62 and putting an end to the reform adopted last year is being studied this Thursday 28 November 2024 in the National Assembly. The bill for the return into force of the old rules is supported by La France insoumise, a month after a similar proposal from the National Rally.
In the hemicycle, arithmetic would say that the reform will be repealed: more than 300 deputies, or more than half of the Assembly, are in favor. There is therefore apparently no doubt that the text will be adopted. It just shouldn’t happen that easily. Indeed, this text is proposed within the framework of the parliamentary niche of the LFI. It is a day – just one – during which a political group decides the agenda.
However, if a vote is not organized by midnight tonight, everything collapses. The parliamentary niche lasts only one day, until midnight and, once the time comes, everything stops, no matter where the debates are. Thus, to delay the vote as much as possible, the Macronist and LR deputies presented almost 1000 amendments. Enough to drag on the debates for a long time with the hope, ultimately, of a renunciation by the left or of discussions that would not end before the bell rings.
Furthermore, it should be noted that if the bill on the return of pensioners at 62 is adopted, the text should then be adopted by the Senate. Mission impossible because in the Upper House it is the government coalition that has the majority and therefore is against the repeal. This therefore has no chance of success, while the majority of deputies, but also of the French, are in favor of returning to 62 years of age.
#repeal #pass #deputies
What are the key arguments for and against the proposed repeal of the pension reform in France?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Pension Reform Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re diving into a hot topic that’s been making waves across the nation – the proposed repeal of the recent pension reform. To shed some light on this complex issue, we have with us Dr. Claire Dupont, a noted economist and expert in labor policies. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Dupont!
Dr. Claire Dupont: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss such an important subject.
Editor: Let’s jump right in. As of today, November 28, 2024, the National Assembly is reviewing a bill that could return the retirement age to 62. Can you explain the implications of this potential change for workers and the economy?
Dr. Dupont: Absolutely. The proposed repeal of the pension reform that raised the retirement age to 64 has significant implications. If the bill passes and the age is reverted back to 62, it will directly affect the retirement plans for many workers, especially those in physically demanding jobs who often find it difficult to work longer. Economically, this could lead to an increased burden on the pension system if more people retire earlier, but it might also foster a happier workforce, potentially boosting productivity and consumer spending.
Editor: It sounds like there are both pros and cons to this change. Can you elaborate on the potential impact on the pension system itself?
Dr. Dupont: Yes, of course. The pension system is primarily funded through contributions from current workers. If retirement ages are lowered, we may face a situation where fewer contributors are funding a growing number of retirees, which could lead to financial strain. This is a classic dilemma: balancing economic sustainability with the social need for fair and equitable retirement options.
Editor: That brings us to a critical point in the debate. How do you see public sentiment shaping this decision? There seems to be significant opposition to the previous reforms.
Dr. Dupont: Public sentiment plays a crucial role in such reforms. Many workers already feel the pressure of increased work years combined with economic uncertainty. The push to revert to 62 reflects a broader desire for social equity and workers’ rights, rather than just economic numbers. Politically, parties that advocate for returning the retirement age might harness this public sentiment to gain electoral support.
Editor: Speaking of political support, what do you think the government’s next steps should be if this bill doesn’t pass?
Dr. Dupont: If the bill does not pass, the government will need to engage in meaningful dialog with labor unions and civil society to understand the public’s concerns better. They might also consider gradual reforms that ease the burden rather than an outright reversal. Transparency in communicating the necessity of changes and potential compromises may help in finding acceptable middle ground.
Editor: It seems crucial for the government to maintain dialog with the public. In your opinion, what is the best long-term approach to pension reform in France, given the current economic climate?
Dr. Dupont: A long-term approach should focus on sustainability while considering the demographic changes we face. This might involve introducing flexible retirement options, enhancing the incentive for later retirement, and increasing support for younger workers entering the market. It’s also vital to ensure that all workers, regardless of their job’s physical demands, have fair access to retirement benefits.
Editor: That’s a thoughtful perspective, Dr. Dupont. As we wrap up, what key takeaway would you like our readers to remember about this ongoing situation?
Dr. Dupont: I would encourage readers to stay informed and engage in discussions about pension reform. It’s a significant part of our social fabric and affects us all, whether we are near retirement or just starting our careers. Advocacy for fair policies and open dialog can lead to better outcomes for everyone.
Editor: Thank you so much for sharing your insights with us today, Dr. Dupont. This is certainly a vital conversation, and we appreciate your expertise!
Dr. Dupont: Thank you for having me! It’s been a pleasure.
Editor: That wraps up our discussion. Stay tuned for further updates on this important legislative development.