In a country where extortion as a means of citizen control has become so widespread, and in many regions of teh country, to the point that many prefer to do it day by day and call it a vaccine, (like if you pay , it helps you live), nothing strange Politicians must have reduced its danger and malignancy and will use it as blackmail to get the advantages that reason and consensus do not give.
Since the threat of intimidation is a methodology used by President Petro as a successful candidate and to rule, the country has seen how his government has resorted to institutionalized blackmail to obtain political victories that they somehow do not achieve.not so horrible.
Because the Minister of the interior, the vaunt Cristo, is being blackmailed, threatening that if they do not approve the political reforms proposed by the ruler to the Congress, then they will convene an Assembly, which politicians and businessmen are so afraid of .
Measured by the same yardstick, the threat made by the brilliant but very rude Minister of Education when he threatened that if Congress does not approve tax reform proposed by the governor to impose more taxes on the colombia, it is alleged that the president and his ministers will not do them. they will have no choice but to close Icetex and leave almost half a million students who finance their university studies through that entity hanging.
And it is the blackmail, from the outside to the inside of PetroS government, which has been implemented in such a grotesque, but very clever way, by the worthy Armando Benedetti when he manages to be repeated within the apparatus of the Casa de Nariño despite his.tremens illusions, his crude truths and threats to tell what only he seems to know. The period of four years is blackmail in all directions, from here to now and from here to now.
The post Blackmailing is also controlled appeared first on Diario Occidente.
What are the historical roots of blackmail in Colombian politics?
Interview: The Dynamics of Blackmail in Colombian politics
Editor of Time.news (E): Today, we’re diving deep into a pressing issue in Colombia’s political landscape—systematic blackmail within government operations. Joining us is Dr. Mariana López, a political science expert from the University of Bogotá, who specializes in governance adn public policy. Thank you for being here, Dr.López.
Dr.Mariana López (M): Thank you for having me. It’s crucial to discuss these troubling trends.
E: Let’s start with the alarming idea that extortion has become a daily norm for citizens in Colombia. Could you explain how this has evolved and why it’s being referred to as a “vaccine”?
M: Absolutely. In many regions of Colombia, citizens have resorted to paying off local criminals to avoid intimidation or violence. This practice has become so normalized that people see it as a necessary means of survival—hence the term “vaccine.” They believe that paying these extortionists will protect them, which underscores the deep-rooted fear and corruption infiltrating everyday life.
E: That’s deeply concerning. In your opinion, how have politicians, particularly President Petro, leveraged this environment of fear for political gain?
M: President Petro’s administration has shown a willingness to use threats for institutional leverage.by creating an atmosphere of uncertainty—such as the potential for an assembly if political reforms aren’t approved—politicians can pressure Congress to comply with their demands. It’s a classic case of manipulating fear as a tool for political advantage.
E: You mentioned Minister Cristo’s recent blackmail concerning political reforms. Can you expand on that incident and its implications?
M: Certainly. Minister Cristo’s threats illustrate a broader strategy of using coercion to achieve political ends. By indicating that failure to approve reforms could lead to the assembly’s convening—a scenario that terrifies many politicians—he’s effectively weaponizing governance for rhetorical purposes. This not only undermines democratic principles but erodes trust in the political system.
E: And what about the Minister of Education’s threats regarding tax reforms and the potential closure of Icetex? How does that fit into this narrative?
M: This situation is particularly striking. By threatening to nullify support for students relying on Icetex for their education if tax reforms are not passed, the Minister is playing with the futures of countless students for political leverage. It’s an effective, albeit ruthless, strategy that places education funding in the crosshairs of political bargaining.
E: The article also mentioned Armando Benedetti’s role in perpetuating this cycle of blackmail. Can you shed light on his influence and how it functions within the government?
M: Benedetti represents an intricate blend of insider knowledge and ruthless strategies. His threats to expose information positions him as a pivotal figure in the ongoing political drama. By using fear tactics, he instills a sense of insecurity among his peers in the government. This cyclical nature of blackmail and intimidation he perpetuates ensures that political actions are driven more by fear than by mutual consensus or governance.
E: what are the broader implications of this disconcerting trend for Colombian society?
M: The normalization of blackmail not only damages the integrity of institutions but also diminishes the public’s confidence in democratic processes. Citizens may become apathetic or desensitized to corruption, leading to higher levels of disillusionment with governance. This consequently hampers civic engagement and can lead to increased instability within the region.
E: For your advice to the public, how can citizens effectively respond to or counteract this environment of fear and blackmail?
M: Education and awareness are paramount. Citizens must be informed and vigilant, fostering a community that resists intimidation. Engaging in dialog with political representatives,advocating for transparent governance,and supporting institutions that monitor corruption can gradually erode this culture of fear.Grassroots movements can amplify collective voices that demand accountability.
E: Thank you, Dr. López, for your insights today. It’s clear that understanding the dynamics of blackmail within Colombian politics is vital for fostering a healthier democratic environment.
M: Thank you for having me. It’s essential to keep this conversation alive.
E: this has been an enlightening discussion on the troubling issue of blackmail in Colombian politics. For more information, stay tuned to Time.news.