canceled races and demonstration against the possible increase in betting taxes – Libération

by time news
An amendment to the Social Security budget includes⁤ an increase in taxation on horse race betting⁣ like other⁣ gambling‍ taxes, which is​ highly addictive. If it is rejected in the National Assembly,⁢ the sector fears it will return to the⁣ Senate.

So far only Covid-19 and world wars have done​ it: ‌the ‍horse races scheduled for Thursday are cancelled. Announcement from the sector, to accompany the strike and demonstration of the trotting and galloping socio-professional associations. They are mobilizing against the increase ‌in betting taxes, foreseen in one of the many amendments to the Social ‌Security budget project. Even ⁤if ⁣the text is ⁣rejected by ​deputies, the industry fears that⁤ the ⁣issue will return to the Senate.

“It is essential to maintain pressure on the government and elected ‍officialstake ⁢the France Galop and Société⁣ du trotteur⁢ français federations by storm ‌in a statement sent on Wednesday 6 November. Purchases⁢ should not‌ be a balance sheet adjustment variable.they ⁤continue. The industry had already done everything last week‌ to denounce the “deadly choice” of ⁣the government to increase this tax. ⁢The‌ amendment⁤ in ⁢question, presented on October 28, provides for ⁣increasing the tax from 6.9% to 7.5% on the gross revenues of horse⁤ racing bets​ placed ‍in physical​ locations (PMU, racecourses) and from 6.9% to 15 ‍%‍ for online betting. .

It is part of a series of other amendments aimed at focusing more​ on the highly addictive gaming sector. French public health says sohorse racing betting‌ affected 7.7%⁣ of players in 2019, far behind lottery or scratch card games (65%⁣ and 56%), sports betting (11%) but ahead⁢ of casino⁤ games (almost 6%). It is ‍also planned to increase taxation on advertising and promotional offers of operators, on the gross proceeds of some casino ⁢games, online poker and physical sports betting (from 6.6% to⁢ 7.6%) and online (from 10, 6% to 15%).

Fears ⁢for employment

“An increase in⁢ taxation means a decline​ in income ⁢for farmers, and is a mechanical risk of‍ decline in activity and loss of jobs,” he had then warned the horse racing industry, which ​he said “already in difficulty due to the reduction in horse racing betting”.

The text of the ​amendment, however, supports​ this “The French gambling market‍ confirms its dynamism ⁣in 2023 […]. In a context where this trend is increasing,‌ accompanied by the continuous increase in the number ‍of people treated for an addiction problem, increasing social ⁤security contributions would ‌improve the fairness of the ⁢tax system. It aims to a “increased revenue for the healthcare sector”, which⁣ would also contribute to “regulate the sector by limiting the consequences in terms of dependence”.

Asked ​about the topic on Nov. 3, during the ⁢show Sunday in politics on France 3, the Budget Minister, Laurent Saint-Martin, assured this‍ “do not desire” an increase⁣ in these taxes. But the sector still​ intends‍ to keep up the pressure. “It is⁣ essential‍ to make ​the entire political class understand, through a strong mobilization on⁢ Thursday, that we will not give up because our jobs are at ⁤stake”sector organizations insist.

Their demonstration is scheduled for Thursday at noon in Paris. Protesters will not travel ⁤on horseback into the capital for security ⁢reasons. But according to the organizers‌ there will ⁢also be some equines on site, in particular the Italian stuntman and equestrian trainer Mario Luraschi.

Time.news Editor: Thank you for joining us today.⁣ We’re here ⁢to discuss a pressing issue affecting the horse racing industry: the ⁣proposed increase in taxation on​ horse race betting as part of an amendment to the ​Social ⁣Security budget. Could you introduce yourself and explain your background ‌in this field?

Expert: Absolutely, and thank you for having⁢ me. I’m John Dupont,‍ an economist with a focus ‌on the gambling and leisure ⁤sectors. I’ve worked⁢ extensively ​on policy analysis concerning taxation impacts on various forms​ of ⁢gambling, including horse racing,‍ over the last decade.

Time.news Editor: Let’s dive ⁤right in. The proposed​ amendment aims to increase tax on gross revenues from‌ horse race betting from 6.9% to 7.5% for physical locations and a ​staggering increase to ‌15% ⁤for ⁣online betting. What are ⁢your ‍thoughts on this substantial rise?

Expert: It’s a significant⁣ jump, especially ‌for‍ online betting. The move to raise these taxes can lead to unintended consequences. This is a highly competitive market, ⁣and increasing ⁤costs for operators could‍ translate to higher prices for consumers, potentially driving them away to‍ unregulated or illegal betting options.

Time.news Editor: There seems to⁢ be a‌ lot of resistance from the ⁣industry. Professional associations like ⁤France Galop⁣ and the Société ‌du Trotteur Français have expressed deep concerns. Can‌ you elaborate on the possible repercussions for ​the employment sector ⁣if this amendment is approved?

Expert: Absolutely. Increased taxation‌ not only affects operators but also everyone in the supply ​chain—from ⁣breeders to trainers and even the staff at racetracks. If revenues decline due to‍ reduced betting activity spurred by higher taxes, we could ‌see layoffs and reduced economic activity within the sector. It’s a ripple effect that ultimately harms the industry and its workforce.

Time.news Editor: That certainly sounds troubling. The article mentioned that this is part of ⁢a broader strategy to focus on the highly addictive gaming sector. Given that horse racing betting has been identified as affecting 7.7% of players, do you think this ‍strategy is effective or overly punitive?

Expert: It’s a double-edged sword. On one‍ hand, targeting addictive practices in‌ gambling is⁣ essential for ‍public health. On the other, if the government pushes‍ these taxes​ too high without considering the economics of the industry, it risks⁤ flattening what remains of ⁢the market. We ⁢need balanced⁢ approaches that⁤ prioritize responsible gaming while ensuring the industry can sustain itself.

Time.news Editor: In the context of public health, what strategies should the industry adopt to ⁤mitigate ‌addiction risks while still thriving economically?

Expert: Education is key. ⁢The industry should invest in awareness campaigns about ‌responsible⁤ betting practices. Additionally, implementing tools to help limit betting amounts, along with counseling resources for those ⁤who⁤ feel⁣ they may be struggling with addiction, can create a ‍safer environment for ⁢both the industry and its consumers.

Time.news ‍Editor: The fear of this‌ issue being sent back to the Senate looms large over the ⁤industry. What do ‍you think the next steps should be for the associations and⁤ stakeholders involved?

Expert: They need to mobilize ⁢their members and public opinion. Engaging with ‍lawmakers to highlight the potential negative impacts of the​ proposed tax increases is critical. Demonstrations, like the recent strikes, alongside constructive‌ dialogue about a ‌potential compromise, could prove effective. Industry representatives ‍must communicate⁢ their concerns clearly and strategically to avoid a detrimental outcome for all ‌involved.

Time.news Editor: ‍ Thank you, John, for providing such insightful perspectives on this complex issue. It’s clear that ⁣the‍ proposed taxation changes could‍ have far-reaching consequences for the horse racing ​industry and ‌beyond. We look forward to seeing how this ​unfolds‌ in the National Assembly and ⁤beyond.

Expert: Thank you for having me. I’m hopeful that through dialogue and ⁣collaboration, we ⁢can find solutions that support both public health⁤ and a vibrant, sustainable horse racing⁣ industry.

You may also like

Leave a Comment