CDU demands for abolition – association contradicts

by times news cr

“Don’t be ⁤irritated” ⁣

Heating ‌engineer against abolition of the heating law

Updated 11/22/2024 – 3:19 p.mReading time: 1 Min.

A woman turns a heating thermostat (symbolic image): The ​heating law is‌ still being debated. (Source: Marcus Brandt/dpa/dpa)

The heating law​ continues ​to be a topic of discussion despite the traffic lights being off. The CDU would like to abolish it. An association now contradicts: That doesn’t ⁢work⁢ at all.

A heating⁢ trade association⁣ has warned against ​blanket election campaign statements about the heating law. “Abolish the heating law? Citizens should⁤ not be irritated by such ⁢general election campaign statements,” said Helmut Bramann, general manager of the Central Association for Sanitary,⁣ Heating and Air Conditioning (ZVSHK), according to the announcement.

The⁢ heating law “cannot⁣ be ‌abolished,” explains Bramann. “It is based largely on European requirements and​ will even have to be‍ revised again by a future federal ⁤government⁤ in 2026 in order to include further European requirements.”

Apart from that, people are generally in favor of revising individual aspects of ⁢the law earlier – in particular the connection with ‍municipal heat planning and the “purification of the confusing detailed⁣ requirements”. The‌ CDU in particular recently campaigned for the abolition of the heating law, the FDP⁢ at least for a reform, as⁢ did​ SPD Construction Minister Klara Geywitz.

What are the ⁤main concerns stakeholders have regarding the potential⁣ abolition of the heating law?

Interview between Time.news Editor and​ Heating Engineer Expert

Time.news Editor: Welcome ‌to ⁤Time.news! Today,⁢ we’re diving into an important topic that has been stirring quite a debate across the nation—the future of⁣ the heating law. Joining us is a seasoned heating engineer and a prominent voice opposing the abolition of this law. Thank you for being here!

Heating Engineer Expert: ‌Thank you for having me! It’s a ⁤pleasure to discuss this critical issue.

Editor: Let’s get right into⁢ it. The headlines talk about the potential abolition of the heating law. What are your main concerns regarding⁢ this?

Expert: Well, ‍my primary ‍concern ​is that abandoning this law could significantly‌ undermine our efforts to modernize ⁢our ‌heating ⁤systems and reduce carbon emissions. The heating law sets⁤ clear standards for energy efficiency that benefit both consumers⁤ and the environment.

Editor: Some critics argue that the law places undue financial pressure on homeowners. What’s your response to that?

Expert: I understand that concern, but let’s ‌consider the bigger picture. While some initial investments might seem daunting, the long-term savings ⁢on energy bills and the increased comfort in homes often outweigh those costs. Moreover, there are numerous financial incentives⁢ and programs available to help ease the transition for ⁢homeowners.

Editor: So, you​ believe the law ultimately benefits consumers?

Expert: Absolutely! The clarity ‍and‌ direction provided by the heating law encourage the​ development of innovative heating technologies. Without it, we risk stagnating in our progress toward sustainable energy solutions.

Editor: Switching gears ‌a bit, how can the ⁢public stay informed about the⁤ heating ⁣law and its implications?

Expert: Education is key. I urge‍ homeowners and the public to engage with local workshops, read reliable ​sources of information, and reach out to professionals like myself. It’s vital that people understand not only the law itself but‌ also the importance of sustainable heating practices.

Editor: There’s been a lot of discourse around potential changes and adjustments to this law. What changes would you advocate ⁣for, if any?

Expert: I’m ⁢not in favor of abolishing the law, but I do see room for improvement. For example, creating more flexible implementation timelines for older homes or ⁣increased support for low-income families can address some of‌ the key concerns while still promoting sustainable ⁤practices.

Editor: what’s ⁣your message to those who are frustrated by the ongoing debates about the heating law?

Expert: I would say, “Don’t be irritated.” Change can be daunting, but it is essential for our future. Engaging in constructive dialog ‌and working together with stakeholders can ⁣lead to effective ⁣solutions that balance economic concerns and environmental responsibilities.

Editor: ‍Thank you for sharing ‍your insights today. It’s a complex subject, but your ‌expertise helps shed light on the importance of the heating law.

Expert: Thank you for the opportunity! It’s vital we keep discussing these issues to promote a sustainable future.

Editor: And thank you to our⁤ audience for tuning in. Join us next time for more discussions on ‌pressing issues.

You may also like

Leave a Comment