In response to the reform of the Judiciary, today Wednesday October 30los ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) warned that they could order the dismissal of President Claudia Sheinbaum; this in case of not complying with a resolution judicial.
During today’s October 30 broadcast on Grupo Formula hosted by Azucena Uresti, the retired minister, José Ramón Cossío, spoke about project of the minister Juan Luis González Alcántara Carrancáwhich seeks to invalidate the reform of the Judiciary and was approved by the SCJN.
In this sense, it is worth remembering that the reform of the Judiciary It is already part of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States (CPEUM); this after its approval and accession to the Official Gazette of the Federation in the government of Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO).
The Chamber of Deputies approved constitutional supremacy in general
Was the initiative of Constitutional Supremacy in the plenary session of the Chamber of Deputies, during the ordinary session of today, Wednesday, October 30; its discussion in particular is missing.
SCJN confirmed the resignation of 8 ministers
The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) issued a statement through which confirmed that 8 ministers presented their resignation formal to their positions for the reform of the Judiciary.
The resignations of ministers from the SCJN and their letters of reasons (Eduardo Díaz/SDPnoticias.com)
Former minister of the SCJN sees a “very dangerous escalation” if Claudia Sheinbaum does not comply with the resolution of the Judiciary
Around the reform of the Judiciarythe retired minister of the SCJN, José Ramón Cossío, warned a “very dangerous climb” in the event that President Claudia Sheinbaum does not comply with a judicial resolution to invalidate what is written in the Political Constitution.
In an interview with journalist Azucena Uresti today, October 30, the former minister He said he called for “rationality”. He also pointed out what he considered a constitutional basis for “to depose and subdue” to those who do not comply with the ruling of the SCJN.
“It could happen that the deputies, the senators, the President of the Republic would say ‘we ignore this’ (…) There could be a very dangerous escalation, and hopefully rationality will prevail, because if it were to happen In this situation, the ministers could consider that there is contempt on the part of the deputies, senators and some other authorities, and the ministers, based on section XVI of article 107 of the Constitution and its applications to 105, could consider that there is must be removed, those who do not comply with their sentence must be removed and prosecuted.”
José Ramón Cossío
Former minister of the SCJN says that Claudia Sheinbaum would not be violated; would be reported to the FGR
Former minister José Ramón Cossío assured that the SCJN has the power to consider the removal and dismissal of Claudia Sheinbaum; He said that if this order were issued, the president of Mexico would not be violated but would be reported to the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic. (FGR).
In that sense, the retired minister specified that the order would not pass through the Congress of the Union:
“It would not go through the violation, because it is a decision that historically the Supreme Court considers that it does not have to go through the Chamber, nor does it have to go through the accusation of the Prosecutor’s Office with the opening of an investigation folder, it is the only case where what is called the monopoly on the exercise of criminal action is broken.”
José Ramón Cossío
In this list of ideas, Cossío affirmed that the ministers of the Supreme Court can record directly before a judge of district to those who consider in contempt or rebellion with respect to the resolution of the Judiciary, in order to comply with a sentence by crimes against public administration.
Interview: The Future of the Judiciary Reform in Mexico
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news, where we delve into the most pressing issues shaping our world today. With us is José Ramón Cossío, a retired minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) and a leading voice on the ongoing reform of the Judiciary in Mexico. Thank you for joining us, Mr. Cossío.
José Ramón Cossío: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss these crucial developments.
Editor: There’s been significant tension lately regarding the Judiciary reform initiated during the AMLO administration. Can you summarize the core issues surrounding this reform and why it has become a flashpoint in the political landscape?
Cossío: Certainly. The reform of the Judiciary has deep implications for the balance of power in Mexico. It is now enshrined in the Political Constitution, but it has sparked concern among various stakeholders, including members of the SCJN. This tension arises from fears that the reform undermines judicial independence. Our warning today signals that if President Claudia Sheinbaum doesn’t comply with judicial rulings, we could be looking at severe constitutional ramifications.
Editor: You mentioned a possible dismissal of the president should she ignore the SCJN’s directives. What legal grounds exist for such an extreme measure?
Cossío: Article 107 of the Constitution outlines procedures in cases of legal contempt. If authorities—including the President—were to openly disregard a SCJN ruling, we could argue that they are not fulfilling their constitutional duties. This noncompliance raises alarms about the integrity of our democratic institutions. As I stated during my recent interview, ignoring the ruling could lead to what I termed a “very dangerous escalation” in our political environment.
Editor: You’ve called for rationality in this tense scenario. Can you elaborate on what that means in practical terms for both lawmakers and the executive branch?
Cossío: Absolutely. Rationality implies that all parties recognize the rule of law as fundamental to our democracy. There should be a willingness to engage in a healthy dialogue rather than resort to confrontational tactics. It is essential that the President and legislators respect the Court’s rulings to maintain stability and public trust in our judicial system.
Editor: Amidst all this, the resignation of eight ministers from the SCJN sends a powerful message. What does this exodus say about the inner workings of the judiciary and the current political climate?
Cossío: Their resignations reflect profound discontent within the judicial branch. It highlights concerns about potential overreach by the executive and a lack of dialogue that is essential for a functioning democracy. When judges feel that their ability to serve impartially is compromised, it erodes the very foundation of our legal system.
Editor: As this situation unfolds, what steps do you believe should be taken next to address the challenges currently facing the Judiciary?
Cossío: First, there needs to be a concerted effort to foster a dialogue between all branches of government. This includes not only compliance with judicial decisions but also a commitment to ensure the reforms do not infringe upon judicial independence. Educational efforts about the importance of rule of law and constitutional principles should also be prioritized to prevent future misunderstandings.
Editor: Thank you for sharing your insights today, Mr. Cossío. It’s clear that the path ahead is fraught with challenges, but your emphasis on rational dialogue is both timely and necessary.
Cossío: Thank you for having me. Let’s hope that reason prevails, as it is in the interest of all Mexicans to uphold our democratic institutions.
Editor: You’ve heard it here first, folks. The next steps in this unfolding drama will surely impact Mexico’s future. Stay tuned for more updates from Time.news.