Cognac surtaxes: China announces the establishment of “temporary anti-dumping measures”

by time news

Trade tensions between Beijing ‌and Brussels.​ China announced on Monday the imposition of “temporary ‍anti-dumping measures”⁤ on ⁢brandies (wine-based spirits) imported from ‍the European Union ​(EU), of⁣ which cognac accounts for 95% of the total.

It was not immediately clear on Monday whether these measures, which will be imposed‌ from Friday, ⁣were new or an extension of existing ones. Since October 11, China⁢ has‍ already asked ⁣European brandy importers‍ to lodge a‍ deposit with Chinese customs, as part of an anti-dumping investigation.

“The investigating authorities (on European brandies) have decided to implement temporary anti-dumping measures ‌in the form of a bond​ or letter ‌of guarantee,” China’s Ministry of Commerce said in a press release on Monday.

A text ‌with almost identical wording was published ‌by⁤ this ministry​ on 8 October and led⁢ to the adoption of⁣ the measures three days later. ⁣Monday’s press release, billed as an “additional announcement,” does not specify ‌when these new​ temporary measures will expire.

Retaliatory measure

This anti-dumping investigation⁣ is widely seen as ⁢a retaliatory measure after ⁣the⁣ European Commission⁢ adopted a regulation in October imposing additional⁣ customs duties⁢ on​ electric cars ‌imported ⁢from China, which it accused of​ unfair‌ competition. ​A measure that had the strong support of France.

In France, the cognac interprofessional association believes it has been “sacrificed” by the government for the ‌benefit of ‌the automotive industry. A French diplomatic source strongly⁢ denounced⁤ these Chinese measures at the end⁣ of⁢ October, the “political ‍nature ⁤of which is evident”.

The ‌imposition of customs surcharges on cognac could⁣ have devastating effects ​on the sector and block this product’s access to⁢ the Chinese market. “We are⁣ ready to take all ⁣possible technical‌ and legal measures” if necessary, ‍the French Minister of Foreign Trade, Sophie Primas, indicated⁤ last week.⁢ However, he stressed⁣ that negotiations with Beijing on cognac⁣ remain ‌“clearly open.”

In addition to brandies, China is also‌ conducting anti-dumping investigations⁤ against‍ pork and dairy products imported from the EU, ‍posing a threat to ⁣these sectors.

Interview: Time.news​ Editor ⁣with Trade Relations⁢ Expert on China-EU ​Tensions over Brandy​ Imports

Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re diving into the recent trade tensions‌ between China and the ‍European Union, particularly focusing on the new anti-dumping measures imposed on European brandies. With us is Dr. Maria Liu, a trade relations ‌expert. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Liu!

Dr. Maria Liu: Thank ⁣you for having me! It’s great to be here.

Editor: Let’s get right⁢ into it. China has announced “temporary anti-dumping measures” on ‍brandies imported from the EU,‍ which predominantly affects French cognac. Could you explain the implications of these measures?

Dr. Liu: Certainly. Anti-dumping ⁣measures are typically⁤ implemented ⁢to protect domestic industries from⁣ foreign competition that is⁣ selling goods at below market value. In this case, China seems to be targeting European brandies​ to shield its own burgeoning spirits market. This is particularly significant given that cognac represents ​95% of European brandy ⁣exports to China.

Editor: That’s a ‌significant number. What led to these measures, and do you think they⁣ are an extension ‍of previous actions or something entirely ​new?

Dr. ‌Liu:⁢ The situation is a bit murky. Since early October, China has been asking European importers to pay deposits as part of an anti-dumping investigation. The announcement⁤ is somewhat ambiguous about ‌whether these measures are new or an extension. Often, such measures are a strategic ​move during ongoing investigations to apply pressure on the​ foreign exporters.

Editor: The Chinese Ministry of Commerce mentioned ​temporary measures in their press release. How⁤ temporary can we expect these actions to be, based on past experiences?

Dr. Liu: That’s ⁤an excellent point. The term “temporary” can be‌ misleading. In trade cases, temporary measures can last for several months while investigations are⁤ ongoing,⁤ sometimes⁣ extending for years depending on the complexity of the case. ‍The failure to specify an expiration date in⁣ the latest‌ announcement raises concerns about⁤ the potential for these ⁣measures ⁤to become prolonged.

Editor: It sounds as though this could escalate. ‍Historically, how have such trade⁢ tensions impacted the spirits market and broader trade relations?

Dr. Liu: Trade tensions can have ⁣a domino effect. Past instances, like those seen with tariffs on American wines or ⁢metals, have not only impacted prices ⁤but also led to shifts in consumer behavior and sourcing. For cognac producers, these measures could‍ limit their market access in China—one of​ the biggest ⁤markets ‍for cognac outside France—leading⁣ to ⁢financial losses and even shifts in branding strategies. On a broader level, ​such measures often exacerbate diplomatic tensions​ between countries.

Editor:​ Given that‍ context, what do you believe the EU’s response will be?

Dr. Liu: The EU has ⁤been proactive in defending its interests in past ⁢disputes. Expect a ⁤multifaceted response; they may pursue negotiations ⁢to mitigate the‌ impact of​ these measures and explore legal⁣ avenues through the World Trade Organization (WTO). Moreover, ‍they might also look to⁣ strengthen trade ties with other regions as a counterbalance.

Editor: This is a pivotal ⁢moment for international‌ trade relations. ‍Are there any silver linings to this situation for EU exporters?

Dr. Liu: It’s possible. Such challenges ‍often spur innovation and diversification. European producers might look to ⁢expand in other ‍markets or⁤ shift their ⁤strategies to adjust to the ​new realities. Additionally,⁣ if the EU​ gathers strong support and​ successfully defends their interests, it may establish a precedent ‍that‌ strengthens their bargaining power in future negotiations.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Liu! This has been incredibly insightful. It seems we all ⁣need to keep‌ a close watch on how this⁢ situation unfolds.

Dr. Liu: Absolutely. The implications of such trade measures can be far-reaching. Thank you for having me!

Editor: Thank you ⁤to our viewers for tuning in to this discussion. Stay connected with Time.news⁤ for updates on this evolving story.

You may also like

Leave a Comment