The narcissism of Jupiter 1ᵉʳ, aka Emmanuel Macron, would be known and derided everywhere on the planet (1), as much as he himself is known (and similarly derided) internationally, as a guest star in a political remake of ” The idiots’ dinner » by Francis Veber, which we (we French) witness in amazement in each of the multi-state public meetings in which he participates.
However, a caveat seems to need to be placed on the incontestability of this statement, with regard to 100% evident legal and factual elements. This one in particular.
Furthermore, the Labor Code, the pension system, agriculture, industry, energy independence, etc., “destroy everything to rebuild better” (for the benefit of his sponsors) being, of course, also Emmanuel Macron’s strategy to carry forward the ” Because it’s our project! » for which he was placed in the Elysée, the third world war into which the explosion of the war in Ukraine brings us, would be a blessing for Emmanuel Macron and others.
Obligatory, almost synonymous with the global nuclear apocalypse that would be this third world war, the outbreak of war in Ukraine, for Emmanuel Macron and others, would be the ideal scenario. The economic and human chaos into which France would sink would be of unprecedented proportions. The day of glory has finally arrived for the gravediggers of the people who are the men of power. These politicians, traitors of the homeland, who work for the advent of a new world order, synonymous with a Fourth Reich that can truly last a thousand years, thanks to the total and permanent control of the population which is now possible, with those who still hesitate to consider how “ complete fools “, what these individuals call “artificial intelligence”. »
YES. Emmanuel Macron: on a forced march towards war. The war “at any cost” to remain on the throne. And, as always, since his truncated arrival in power, he will not be the one to pay the bill. They are the French. The 68 million men, women and children who, all dead as they are, will no longer have to repay the public debt of 3,200 billion euros that Macron and his associates made us pay. But agree with me: what a small consolation!
Whether nuclear or not, war only benefits dishonest industrialists and politicians, who force people to die en masse. It benefits them “systematically”, or rather, I would say more precisely.
Resorting to military warfare is the system used by dishonest politicians as soon as the moment arrives when they would normally be held accountable. Being judged in public, for the economic war that they constantly fight against the people, between two wars, on behalf of their sponsors, the ultra-rich who after each new economic “crisis” orchestrated by themselves in a Machiavellian way end up legally robbing the people (2), increase their fortunes as much as the economic and political influence they have on the people.
Among French politicians, let’s say, of stature, Dominique de Villepin seems to be the only one to have the courage for Peace.
In any case, he just made a few the demonstration in front of an Élisabeth Borneshe, even more bellicose than her former boss: Emmanuel Macron. “Kapo’s prerogative”, they whisper to me in management.
Villepin’s understanding and experience of diplomacy relegate technocrats like Elisabeth Borne to the rank of petty amateurs. What this shows is that he simply does not possess the level of independent and autonomous thinking that is essential in this area. It reworks the regulations imposed by propaganda, without the ability required of a diplomat to take note of what is true and what is false… But above all it ignores the interests of the French.
Unfortunately for our so-called “elites”, and fortunately for us, the French people, Vladimir Putin has a great knowledge of the art of war. His strategy is simple. Make them sweat in the face of the CIA’s disinformation attempt, with the New York Times, which managed to convince Macron and other European leaders to agree to deep attack. I deciphered the essentials in this tweet:
The answer will come as well described @HerveHannoun.
➡️However, it remains to be seen which objectives will be chosen and above all to which ears Putin will speak before acting.
➡️The goal of making some people sweat with his latest response has been achieved. The level… pic.twitter.com/fOPXchhJSG— Xavier Azalbert FreeSpeech 🇧🇷 🇫🇷 (@xazalbert) November 24, 2024
At the CIA they say well done, manipulation is beautiful. But let’s also say that it was a great job for Vladimir Putin who will probably have talked into Donald Trump’s ear via intermediary services.
However, at some point we will have to stop playing games and tell ourselves that Vladimir Putin will be smart in his response.
So who, to tell our elites that the point of no return must not be passed and that it may be time to become more realistic about our military capabilities.
Peace or death, I wrote on October 2, concluding with JFK’s phrase:
« humanity will have to end the war, or war will end humanity ».
We are there.
In fact, there won’t be many more degrees of freedom to play with. However, for do diplomacywe have to start to avoid lying to yourself and of comply with the rulethis being by its nature reductive of the degrees of freedom as I had the opportunity to express it in a post on diplomacy.
However, there is one that goes beyond, once and for all, the limits in diplomacy much more than her: Emmanuel Macron.
Just last week he once again proved himself to be as ridiculous, deplorable, disastrous and pathetic as possible. Head of State on an official visit to Brazil, he was like a (posh) neighborhood scum who rudely interrogated a man in his sixties, a peaceful French-speaking commoner who had questioned him as politely as possible about France’s responsibilities within the chaotic situation in Haiti :
« NO. Here, I’ll tell you there. HEY ! Listen to me. Listen to me! Frankly, it was the Haitians who killed Haiti, abandoning the drug trade. And that’s what they did. The Prime Minister was fantastic. I defended him, they fired him. It’s terrible. It’s terrible! And I can’t replace it. They are completely stupid. They should never have released him. The Prime Minister was fantastic. »
Yes: ” What a humiliation! » Sarkozy ten times worse.
Sometimes a photo is worth many words and this one, published on the internet, says a lot
And even more so since it seems that, for once, what we were dealing with there was a “natural” Emmanuel Macron: without powder or make-up, he had gone off on a tangent.
Yes-yes. Once a “nose”, he was not used to giving away his sine-cosine, to the psychedelic trigonometry that many observers attribute to him. This is what eminent specialists in the field who detect symptoms in the eyes and body language have told me.
Ah, jokes aside, the least we can say is thisThe gap between the President of the Republic and the French is fully consummated. The degrees of political freedom that remain to him are few, his government will probably have to face a motion of censure that could bring it down and, apart from a referendum to submit a new project to the French, the last card he would have left would be to present his resignation.
-Dame this November 29, 2024 on the occasion of a “ last site visit “. In fact, through a press release, the BonSens.org association declares that it has issued a new warning through the bailiff Monsignor Ulrico:
- having to ask Emmanuel Macron do not make public speeches in the enclosure of the cathedral during his last visit to the site scheduled for 29 November 2024,
- and to predict it intends to thank the thousands of workers and patrons who contributed to its restoration, do so by inviting them to the Elysée as is usual, for example to congratulate on behalf of the nation’s athletes who have won medals.
This shows that the Jovian conquistador who saw the Republic put in “movement” with the “nudge” strategy (3) is not only faced with the awareness of having blocked the Nation with 1100 billion of additional debt, but moreover it is he which is “pushed” out of Notre-Dame.
There is a “nudgé” who thought he was a “nudger”. (4)
1) especially for children” The world is me! », which Emmanuel Macron foolishly claims he can display in every one of his speeches, when in reality he has no control over absolutely anything in geopolitics. When it comes to narcissism, it has far surpassed the already hyper bland” I am the State! » of Louis XIV. “The Sun King” who, despite the splendor that the official version of History very generously attributes to him, has the downside of having waged wars almost everywhere in Europe during his reign, at the cost of several hundred thousand deaths, and of a country completely drained, economically, left behind upon his death.
2) “legally”, because it is through the application of laws that dishonest politicians vote in this way, that the ultra-rich steal from people without the risk of being disturbed by the judicial system.
3) the theory of “nudge” or liberal paternalism is the strategy which argues that indirect suggestions can, without force, influence the motivations and incite decision making of groups and individuals, in a way at least as effective as direct instruction, legislation or enforcement.
4) echoing the proverb, you get whoever you think you get, I took the liberty of temporarily introducing the verb “nudger” into the French language. A permission that, I hope, you won’t hold against me.
How do the diplomatic relations of political figures like Putin and Trump impact global conflicts and governance?
The text you provided contains a critique of various political figures and events, particularly focusing on Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, and Emmanuel Macron. It discusses the manipulation of narratives in the context of military and diplomatic relations, expressing concern over the consequences of ongoing conflicts and the inadequacy of diplomatic efforts. The author reflects on the diminishing political freedoms for Macron, suggesting that he faces a growing disconnect with the French populace.
Furthermore, the piece highlights a particular incident where Macron confronted a citizen during an official visit to Brazil, portraying him as arrogant and out of touch. It concludes with a warning from an association regarding Macron’s forthcoming public speech at Notre-Dame Cathedral, emphasizing the need for respect and separation of state ceremonies from religious and cultural sites.
the text conveys a sense of urgency regarding political responsibilities and the consequences of leadership decisions amid global tensions. The author calls for a more honest approach in diplomacy and governance while critiquing the current state of political engagement in France.