Kochi: The High Court is considering the anticipatory bail of Dileep and his co-accused in a case of conspiracy to endanger the investigating officers in the case of attacking the actress. The High Court will hear the anticipatory bail application at 1 pm.
Dileep has also made a serious allegation that a conspiracy case has been registered against him as part of an attempt to fabricate evidence in the case of an attempt to attack the actress. Pulsar is a made-up story about Suni. Defendant also stated that the prosecution could not find a suitable person to apologize.
Dileep also argued that there were many things in the FIR that were not in Balachandra Kumar’s statement. Following this, the judge examined the FIR. Dileep maintained that there was no conspiracy against the investigating officers. Dileep said it was not a conspiracy to watch the video and say ‘you will suffer’. How can it be a conspiracy to tell relatives at home.
It is unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post. Police are not ready to reveal who the VIP is. Dileep’s lawyer alleged that the name was omitted to include someone who was willing to apologize. The conspiracy took place between the ADGP and other officials. That is the conspiracy. The respondent also asked the Crime Branch why it was investigating the alleged conspiracy that took place within the Aluva station limits.
Defendant points out that Balachandra Kumar did not say on which device the conversation was recorded. It is said to be on the recording tab and later transferred to the laptop. Where is the tab that says the conversation was recorded? If the defendant’s phone is not found, it is a problem. But the respondent also demanded that the tab where Balachandra Kumar recorded should be clarified. Dileep’s lawyer also alleged that the conversation had been edited. Dedicated by Balachandrakumar Pendrive. The lawyer asked what to do in the meantime. It is said that they were afraid of being killed if they saw the recording that was not taken together. Yet it was recorded at least three times where six people were seated. None of the verses on the record are complete. Defendant’s attorney also said that there were broken conversation fragments.
Dileep said that the police officer who was the complainant in the case was investigating the case of the attack on the actress and then how could he get justice. The names of the policemen were written down. Balachandra Kumar’s statement does not say that he threatened Baiju Paul. But Dileep’s lawyer argued that Baiju Paul’s name was in the FIR. Sudarshan, who investigated the case, did not touch his body. Dileep asks why he is saying that he will cut off Sudarshan’s hand.
Dileep’s brother P. Anoop, his sister’s husband TN Suraj, friend Baiju Chengamanadu and Anoop’s wife’s cousin Appu are the other accused in the case. The crime branch registered the case based on the statement of Dileep’s former friend and director Balachandra Kumar. The prosecution wants Dileep to be questioned in custody. But the respondent also argues that the case is fabricated.
Defendant will co-operate fully with the investigation and present their possession on the phones requested by the prosecution and will require anticipatory bail in this case. The prosecution will inform the court today that the respondent is trying to divert the case and has not produced all the phones requested by the crime branch.
According to the prosecution, the mobile phone used by Dileep from January to August 2021 has not been handed over to the court. The prosecution said Dileep’s claim that he did not know the identity of the mobile phone which had made more than 2,000 calls could not be accepted. The High Court had on Monday directed the court to expedite the case.
English Summary: Actor Dileep’s anticipatory bail plea