Corruption? Supervisory board fires board members after major raid

by times news cr

Thousands of euros in bribes collected?

Mobile ​home manufacturer fires two board members after‍ major raid

November ⁤28, 2024 – 6:58⁤ p.mReading‍ time: 2 min.

Trade fair ‍visitors inspect a van from Knaus‍ Tabbert‍ (archive​ photo): The mobile home manufacturer gets into turbulence after a major raid. (Quelle: IMAGO/Arnulf Hettrich/imago)

The major raid⁤ on mobile⁤ home manufacturer Knaus‍ Tabbert is causing‌ quite a stir. The supervisory ‌board fires two board members. You ⁤are being made serious allegations.

The leisure vehicle manufacturer Knaus Tabbert has terminated two of its current three‌ board members without⁤ notice. The two⁤ managers will no longer work for Knaus Tabbert AG with immediate effect, the company based in Jandelsbrunn, ⁣Lower Bavaria, announced.

The reason is therefore the “criminal allegations” that have shaken Knaus Tabbert since⁣ the day before. The Landshut public prosecutor’s office had searched offices and ‌business premises at ‍the company’s headquarters with a​ large ​contingent ⁣of over 160 police officers on suspicion of ‍corruption; two managers are in custody. Read more about this here.

Knaus Tabbert’s caravans and mobile homes are part⁣ of the‍ street scene on the ‌highways and in europe’s holiday regions; ‍this ⁣year the company is struggling with ‌a serious sales crisis.Production at the company ​headquarters and in a ⁤Hungarian factory is currently at a standstill due to a ⁢lack of demand; production is still ongoing at two other locations.

Now the‌ criminal case has been added: the two men are said to have ⁤collected bribes from suppliers and in ‍return given them advantages when awarding contracts. Last ⁢year, Knaus tabbert ⁤achieved sales of 1.4 billion⁤ euros.

Knaus ⁢Tabbert emphasized ⁣in a⁤ statement that the ⁢listed company was not accused of any wrongdoing, but that it was itself​ damaged. “We are‍ committed to⁤ taking additional measures to‍ prevent such⁢ events in⁤ the future, including improving internal processes and controls,” the statement said.

It⁤ is obvious that the supervisory board took action: the ‌control committee decided to terminate the employment contracts ⁤of​ the two board ‍members with⁣ immediate effect,as stated in the statement.

The details are still​ unknown – such as how much money the two businessmen⁢ are said ‌to have accepted. The only thing that is clear is that the sum involved is at least 50,000 euros, because the public prosecutor’s office is assuming‌ a ⁤particularly serious case of bribery. The threshold for this accusation is 50,000 euros. It is indeed also unknown when ‍and over ‍what period of ⁣time the crimes took place.

Even before the criminal allegations, there ⁤was‌ personnel turbulence in⁢ the executive suite‍ at Knaus⁢ Tabbert. In the spring, CFO Carolin Schürmann left the company, and ⁣Speck then took over the management of the finance ⁢department⁢ in‌ a ‍dual role.The temporary CEO and chief financial ‌officer himself left⁤ at the end of October, and one of the two men⁣ now fired became interim CEO for a few weeks.

Last week,major shareholder ‌Wim de Pundert finally took on the dual role of CEO and CFO. The Dutchman is ⁣currently the ​only incumbent board member.

What are teh potential consequences for Knaus Tabbert following the raid⁣ and the dismissal of board members?

Interview Between Time.news Editor and expert on Recent Mobile⁤ Home Manufacturer Scandal

Editor: Good evening, and welcome to Time.news. Today,‍ we’re diving into a⁢ pressing issue that’s stirred significant controversy in the​ mobile home industry. Our guest is Dr. Anna Klein, an expert ​in corporate ethics and governance. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Klein.

Dr. Klein: Thank you for having me. It’s a timely topic indeed.

Editor: Just this week, a major raid occurred at Knaus Tabbert, a ‍well-known mobile ⁤home manufacturer, leading to the dismissal of two board members. What can you tell us about​ the implications of such raids in the corporate world?

Dr. Klein: Raids like this typically indicate serious underlying issues. In this case, the accusation of bribery points ​to a​ potential culture of corruption within the company. It can devastate not only the company’s reputation but also investor confidence.

Editor: Thousands of euros in bribes were allegedly‍ involved. How‍ common is it for companies, especially in manufacturing, to engage in⁣ such unethical practices?

dr. Klein: Unfortunately, it’s not uncommon.⁢ In ⁢highly competitive industries, the pressure to outperform competitors can lead some individuals to make ethically questionable decisions.​ this is exacerbated in⁣ contexts ⁢with less scrutiny, where oversight might be weaker.

Editor: Given that two board members ⁣have already been fired, what does this ⁢suggest about the company’s governance structure and their response to potential misconduct?

Dr. Klein: The swift action taken by⁤ Knaus Tabbert suggests they are trying to mitigate damage and visibly uphold corporate governance standards.‍ Though, it’s also indicative of potential systemic issues within their leadership – a ‌strong governance framework would ideally prevent such behavior from occurring in the first place.

Editor: How do you think this incident will impact the broader mobile home⁤ market⁣ and consumer trust?

Dr. Klein: Trust is foundational⁤ in the consumer market. The mobile home sector could see a ripple effect where consumers become more skeptical ⁣of brands, not just Knaus Tabbert. Other manufacturers may need to reinforce their ethical ​standards and transparent practices to retain consumer confidence.

Editor: What steps can companies ‍take to prevent situations like this in the future?

Dr. Klein: First⁢ and⁤ foremost, fostering a strong ethical culture is crucial. This involves regular ethics training, establishing clear reporting procedures for unethical behavior, and ‌enforcing accountability at all levels. ⁣Additionally, companies should ensure that their compliance ⁣programs are robust and that the board is actively engaged in oversight.

Editor: Excellent points, Dr. Klein.As ​we monitor the developments in this case, what should our readers keep in mind as they follow this story?

Dr. Klein: They should‌ look for updates on how the company handles ‌the⁤ aftermath of the raid. Transparency in their investigation⁢ process will be key, as will the‍ actions taken against any involved parties. Also, watching​ how this affects their market position and consumer relations will provide insights into the long-term effects of this scandal.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Klein, for sharing your expertise on this unfolding story. We will certainly ‌keep our readers updated as​ more ​data comes to light.

Dr. Klein: Thank you for addressing such an crucial ​topic. It’s critical to hold corporations accountable.

Editor: And thank you to our viewers for tuning into this discussion. Stay‌ informed with Time.news as we continue to‌ cover this and other significant issues. Good evening!

You may also like

Leave a Comment