De Loredo said that drug trafficking from Santa Fe moved to Córdoba and Quinteros asked him for evidence

by time news

Rodrigo de Loredo‌ attributed the worsening of drug trafficking in Córdoba to the “Santa Fe success” in the fight‌ against this ‌scourge, suggesting that the⁣ problem moved to the province. Juan‌ Pablo Quinteros asked him to provide evidence, invited him to‌ see statistics and said that the ⁢deputy “is more‍ concerned with running for office than with legislating.”

In ‌an interview on the program⁢ New ⁣paragraph (Punto a Punto Radio), Quinteros rejected the radical’s criticism and highlighted the lack of empirical basis‍ for his statements. “I am not surprised that ⁤he speaks⁣ with such​ a degree of arrogance and disdain ‌about a subject that he is fully‍ unaware of.”o“, declared ⁣the minister,‌ who He asked for “a technical⁢ element, a scientific element” ⁤as ⁢proof about his sayings.

Carmen‍ Álvarez rivero from Córdoba, among the five senators who rejected‌ the ‌expulsion of Kueider

Likewise, he invited him to visit⁣ the Police Headquarters to learn more about the actions ⁢that ⁣are being carried out in terms of security. “Let him come, let him see, ⁤let him know. We ⁣show​ them what we are doing and then they criticize.⁤ “He never knocked‍ on my door ‍or wanted ⁢to come see what we are doing,” ⁤Quinteros said.

On drug trafficking and pending legislation

In‌ relation to De Loredo’s statements about the impact of drug trafficking, the minister acknowledged the presence of activities linked⁢ to this ⁢crime in‌ the ‍province, such ⁤as money ⁤launderingbut assured that work is being done to ⁤combat it together with federal forces. “We are concerned about money laundering‍ and we have detected ⁢cases like that of ‍’Calavera’ ⁢Pelozo and others linked to Los Monos,” he explained.

And he added: “When ⁢the⁤ money laundering law​ was approved,de Loredo ​accompanied it. Whitewashing is one thing, but They did ⁣nothing to control money laundering. “Money‍ laundering ⁣is not the same as money laundering.”

In ‌this sense, he announced⁤ the creation of a ⁤financial intelligence area for the prevention of money ​laundering, as part of the measures to combat ⁤drug trafficking⁤ in the province.

Quinteros also pointed‍ out the need ⁣for essential legislative reforms to address these ​problems.He asked ⁤deputies and senators, including those who criticize ⁢him, to ⁣promote laws‌ related to the criminal regime and lowering the age of imputability. “Society‍ is not ‍asking national deputies to come and present their candidaciesbut rather work on legislating,” he stated.

direct crossing

De Loredo had pointed directly⁣ to ⁢the security⁢ area when he was‍ consulted this week about Martín Llaryora’s⁤ management as‍ governed.He described the‍ current situation of insecurity as “catastrophic” and He criticized,without naming him,Quinteros,whom he ⁢called “histrionic” and “useless”.

In⁢ his response, the Minister of ⁤Security mentioned his past as president of Arsat during the presidency of Mauricio Macri: “He handled an eminently technical‍ area that his father-in-law gave him with brutal technical ignorance.”, in ‍reference⁤ to Oscar Aguad, who ⁤served as Minister of Defense in that management.

Rodrigo‍ de Loredo: “Judge told me that the previous election was his last as ​a candidate for governor”

“Question ​a minister as he does not have⁤ experience for the position, but He wants to be governor and he did not ⁣govern anything at all, not even a student center.”, Quinteros redoubled.

At the end ‌of the interview, the minister challenged the deputy: “If he knows something that⁤ I don’t know, let him tell me. I would love for him to come and contribute ​the⁢ ideas he has, ​because if he wants to be governor I imagine he must have brilliant ideas. It truly seems that he ​is more concerned with being a candidate than‌ with legislating.”.

Why is evidence-based policy-making‍ vital in addressing drug-related issues?

Interview Between Time.news editor and Drug Policy⁣ Expert

Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news, where we dive deep into the pressing issues of our time. Today, we have the‍ privilege of speaking with Dr.⁣ Laura Fernández, an expert in drug policy and crime prevention. Dr.​ Fernández, thank you for joining us.

Dr. Laura Fernández: ItS a pleasure to be here. Thank you for having me.

Editor:⁣ Recently,⁤ a heated exchange unfolded⁣ in Córdoba regarding drug trafficking. Deputy Rodrigo de Loredo suggested that the increase in drug ‌problems in Córdoba is a⁣ result ‌of accomplished anti-drug measures in Santa fe. What ‌are your thoughts⁣ on this assertion?

Dr. Fernández: It’s a classic case of what we call ​the “balloon effect” in‌ drug⁣ policy. When law enforcement intensifies efforts in one area, traffickers often​ shift their ‍activities​ to regions with less pressure. though, ‍attributing ⁣the increase purely to ⁣Santa Fe’s success oversimplifies a complex issue. There are various factors at⁣ play, including​ socio-economic ⁣conditions and law⁢ enforcement approaches.

Editor: Juan⁤ Pablo Quinteros, in response, emphasized the need for empirical⁤ evidence when discussing drug trafficking issues. How critical is data in this ​context?

Dr. fernández: Data is vital. Effective policy should ‌be informed by reliable​ statistics and research.Quinteros is rightly highlighting ⁤the importance of evidence-based ⁤approaches. Without data,any claims can easily ‌become speculative and divisive. For⁢ instance, understanding the dynamics of trafficking‍ routes can help tailor targeted interventions⁣ rather than simply ‍attributing blame.

Editor: It seems there’s a political angle ‍at play as well. Quinteros accused de Loredo of being more interested in his political ambitions than in ⁣actual legislation. Do you think politics often overshadows substantive policy discussions?

Dr. Fernández: absolutely. Politicians can ⁤sometimes prioritize their public image or​ career over meaningful discourse. This leads ‌to discussions⁢ that are more​ about posturing ⁣than about solving problems. In​ the ⁢case of drug policy, this can‌ result ‍in missed opportunities for ⁣collaboration across⁣ provinces—collaboration that is crucial for tackling trafficking effectively.

Editor: Considering⁤ this‍ situation, what would you recommend for legislators like de Loredo and⁤ Quinteros to⁤ bridge the gap between political competition and necessary cooperation?

Dr. Fernández: They ⁤need to focus on building ⁢a shared⁤ understanding of the issues at ‌hand, ⁤fostering dialog rooted in research and data. Joint ⁣task⁢ forces that include⁤ law⁣ enforcement, community leaders, and researchers could⁤ facilitate this. It’s essential for them‌ to recognize ​that‍ they ​are working towards ⁤a⁣ common goal:‌ the safety and well-being of their constituents.

Editor: So, collaboration over ⁤competition is key?

Dr. Fernández: Exactly.Drug trafficking knows no borders, and ‍in ‍this‌ very ‍way, it requires a unified approach. By working together and focusing ⁤on evidence-based practices, they can create more effective policies that‌ address the root causes rather than merely reacting to symptoms.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Fernández. Your insights ‌are incredibly valuable, especially as we ⁢navigate these complex social issues. We appreciate your time and expertise.

Dr. Fernández: Thank you for having ⁣me. It’s ‍crucial we ⁣keep the conversation going.

You may also like

Leave a Comment