Using a fake letter of alleged support to seek your re-election in the Presidency of the National Human Rights Commissions (CNDH), has caused opposition senators and civil organizations to request the removal of Rosario Piedra Ibarra of the short list approved by the commissions of the Senate.
The alleged support of the bishop emeritus of Saltillo, Raúl Vera, which he himself denied, adds to the fact that Ibarra Stone was in last place in the evaluations made by the members of the United Commissions on Human Rights y Senate Justiceobtaining only one point, which generated indignation from civil organizations and legislators.
You may be interested in: Parents of children with cancer reject possible re-election of Rosario Piedra in CNDH
The senator of PRI, Claudia Anaya, sent a letter to the presidents of the Senate, Gerardo Fernández; of the Political Coordination Board, Adán Augusto López and of the Justice and Human Rights Commissions, Javier Corral and Reyna Celeste Ascencio, asking to file a complaint against whoever is responsible for having presented apocryphal documentation to the Senate and usurping the identity of other people .
In addition, he asked to remove from the shortlist Stone Rosary for having presented an apocryphal document and not having taken due care to review the veracity of the documentation for which he was legally responsible.
You may be interested: Claudia Anaya asks to remove Rosario Piedra from the shortlist to CNDH
“She did not have the organizational capacity to verify the letters that she presented here, in the best of scenarios, she just grabbed all the papers that came to her and brought them here, regardless of who they were from and whatever they said,” he said. the senator of Revolutionary Party Institutional in interview with 24 HOURS.
Juan Marín Pérez, from the organization Weaving Networks, and who participated in it Open Parliament what did he do Senate for the selection of candidates for the CNDH, He asked the senators to respect the election process and criteria that they themselves made and which did not include any political criteria.
You may be interested: SCJN orders the Congress of Chiapas to decriminalize abortion
He even highlighted that none of the people included in the shortlist will make significant changes in the management of the CNDH, Since the three women “represent the quotas of the ruling party, what we are seeing right now is a struggle between the internal quotas of the ruling party of who they place, but it will still be a captured institution. “It is not a struggle of the opposition, it is not a struggle of the organizations, it is a struggle of Morena.”
Meanwhile, the parents of children with cancer called on the senators of the Republic “so that, in the next election of the Presidency of the National Human Rights Commission, act with the maturity, respect and responsibility that the position demands.
Related
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Human Rights Expert
Editor: Welcome, and thank you for joining us today. We’re discussing a serious and unfolding situation regarding Rosario Piedra Ibarra and her alleged re-election for the presidency of the National Human Rights Commission. To help us navigate this, we have Dr. Ana Torres, a prominent expert in human rights law and ethics. Dr. Torres, could you give us an overview of what has transpired in this case?
Dr. Torres: Thank you for having me. The situation is quite concerning. Rosario Piedra Ibarra’s attempt to use a fake letter of alleged support from Bishop Raúl Vera raises significant questions about the integrity of the re-election process for such an important position. This incident underlines a severe lack of due diligence—both on her part and the procedure that led to her being approved for consideration.
Editor: Indeed, the implications here are quite severe. We’ve seen opposition senators and civil organizations calling for her removal from the shortlist approved by the Senate. What do you think are the lasting effects of using such questionable tactics in a role that is meant to uphold human rights?
Dr. Torres: The effects can be profound and long-lasting. When the head of an organization like the CNDH engages in deceitful practices, it undermines public trust. Civil organizations and the general public rely on the integrity of human rights institutions to advocate for justice and fairness. If people feel that the leadership of these institutions is compromised, it could discourage them from seeking help or reporting abuses, which is precisely the opposite of what the CNDH stands for.
Editor: Claudia Anaya, a senator from the PRI, has advocated for an investigation into this situation and has called for Rosario Piedra Ibarra’s removal. Do you believe that accountability measures like this are effective in promoting ethics in human rights administration?
Dr. Torres: Absolutely. Accountability is crucial in maintaining the integrity of any institution, especially those tasked with protecting and promoting human rights. By calling for investigations and holding leaders accountable for their actions, it sends a strong message that ethical conduct is non-negotiable. It also serves as a deterrent to similar misconduct in the future.
Editor: The opposition has launched serious allegations against Ibarra, including a lack of organizational capacity in verifying documents. What does this signify about the qualifications necessary for someone in such a position?
Dr. Torres: It is essential that individuals in human rights leadership roles possess not just legal knowledge but also the ability to assess the credibility of information critically. An aptitude for due diligence and ethical integrity are paramount. If allegations like these are proven true, it raises concerns that she lacks the requisite skills to fulfill the responsibilities of her role effectively.
Editor: In light of these events, how do you believe this will affect the reputation of the CNDH moving forward?
Dr. Torres: The reputation of the CNDH could suffer significantly if these issues are not addressed transparently and thoroughly. They have to act decisively now to restore credibility, which may involve not only accountability for current leadership but also reforms to strengthen the vetting process for future candidates. The public needs to see meaningful action to rebuild faith in the institution.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Torres, for your insightful analysis on this troubling issue. As the situation develops, we’ll surely keep a close eye on how it unfolds and the implications it carries for human rights advocacy in the nation.
Dr. Torres: Thank you for having me. It is vital we keep these discussions ongoing as they shape the landscape of human rights and democracy in our country.