(Hasher Ahsan) The head of the Constitutional Bench in the Supreme Court has directed the classification of cases.
According to the declaration of the Supreme Court, a meeting was held in the chamber of Justice Aminuddin Khan on the matter of constitution and working of the Constitutional Bench, Registrar Ar Saleem Khan, Additional Registrar Judicial Nazr Abbas participated in the meeting, Institution Officer Nazir Ahmed attended the meeting. Judicial Assistant Abdul Rehman and Judicial Assistant Mubasher Ahmed also participated, the working and procedures of the Constitutional Bench were discussed in the meeting. In the meeting, Justice Aminuddin Khan was briefed about the pending constitutional cases.
Justice Aminuddin Khan was told that human rights cases including article 184 sub-clause one, article 184 sub-clause three and article 186 are also pending. Mazhar Ali Khan Senior Research Officer has been tasked to scrutinize the cases under Article 199, fix the cases for hearing, sit the benches, issue the court roster and consult with the 2 senior members for the cases to be heard in a week. A decision will be taken later, the next meeting will be scheduled later.
The statement said that the Chief Constitutional Bench has directed the classification of cases, the Chief Constitutional Bench will appoint two senior judges to represent the cases, the three-member judges committee will form a bench consisting of at least five judges.
The November 6 meeting was adjourned due to non-availability of the committee member (Justice Jamal Khan Mandukhel), a three-member committee consisting of Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandukhel and Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar will form constitutional benches.
Also Read: Gold became cheap
Time.news Interview: The Future of Case Classification in the Supreme Court
Interviewer (Time.news Editor): Welcome, everyone! Today, we have the privilege of speaking with legal expert Dr. Sarah Malik, a prominent constitutional law scholar. Dr. Malik, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Sarah Malik: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss such an important topic.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. The Supreme Court’s recent directive on the classification of cases has stirred significant interest. Can you shed some light on why this was initiated?
Dr. Malik: Absolutely. The head of the Constitutional Bench, Justice Aminuddin Khan, recognized a pressing need for a more systematic approach to handling cases. The classification aims to streamline processes, ensuring that cases are categorized based on their complexity and urgency. This can reduce backlog and improve overall efficiency in the judicial system.
Editor: That makes sense. Backlogs can significantly delay justice. How do you think this new approach will impact the courts and the public?
Dr. Malik: This initiative could have profound impacts. For one, it allows judges to prioritize cases that require immediate attention. For example, constitutional issues or urgent human rights matters could be fast-tracked. For the public, it brings hope for quicker resolutions, particularly in cases that affect their fundamental rights or freedoms.
Editor: Interesting. Some critics argue that such classifications could lead to biases in the judicial process. How do you respond to that concern?
Dr. Malik: That’s a valid concern. The integrity of the judiciary must be upheld. The Supreme Court, through this classification, should ensure that no bias creeps into the categorization. Transparency in how cases are classified and a clear set of guidelines will be crucial to dispel any fears of unfair practices.
Editor: Fair point. Now, what challenges do you foresee in the implementation of this new classification system?
Dr. Malik: Implementation could face several hurdles. Training judges and court staff to effectively categorize cases is essential. Additionally, there needs to be a comprehensive database to track classifications, which might require significant resources and time to develop. stakeholders need to be on board to ensure cooperation and compliance with the new practices.
Editor: It sounds like there’s a lot of groundwork to be laid. Do you think this initiative will inspire similar reforms in other judicial systems worldwide?
Dr. Malik: I believe it could. Many countries are struggling with case backlog and ineffective judicial processes. If successful, this model could serve as a paradigm shift, encouraging other systems to adopt classification methods tailored to their specific contexts.
Editor: Dr. Malik, your insights are incredibly enlightening. As we look ahead, what will you be watching for as this classification system unfolds in the Supreme Court?
Dr. Malik: I’ll be closely monitoring the metrics of effectiveness – specifically, the average time taken for cases to resolve post-implementation and the public’s perception of the justice system. Additionally, I’ll be looking at how the judiciary balances expediency with fairness.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Malik. Your expertise brings clarity to what can seem like a complex topic. It’s been a pleasure speaking with you today.
Dr. Malik: Thank you for having me! I look forward to seeing how this unfolds.
Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay with us for more discussions on important issues shaping our society.