He defends his taunts against Amira

by time news

Oliver Pocher was a guest on “Late Night Switzerland” with ⁤Stefan Büsser. Among other ‌things, he talked about ‌the divorce from his ex-wife Amira.

SRF ⁤program “Late Night Switzerland”.” loading=”eager”/> Oliver Pocher in ‌the ‍SRF program “Late‍ Night Switzerland”. – SRF shot

The most important ‌thing in a nutshell

  • Stefan Büsser ​welcomed Oliver ‍Pocher on the “Late Night Switzerland”⁢ show.
  • Among other things, the comedians talked about ⁢Pocher’s War⁣ of‌ the Roses with ex-wife Amira.
  • Olli also ⁣defended his many eyebrows against the mother‌ of his children.

Once again he is causing a stir with controversial statements!

Oliver Pocher (46) was a guest on the Swiss satirical show “Late Night Switzerland” on Sunday evening. Then, ‍the⁤ German comedian looked provocative as usual and,⁣ among other things, made fun of his ex-wife Amira Aly (32).

When moderator Stefan Büsser⁤ (39) said that 2023 must be a “shitty‌ year” for him, Pocher ⁤replied⁤ dryly: “Why, my‍ wife ​divorced in ⁢2023 – after that it only goes uphill .”

Oliver Pocher ‌makes a⁤ curious ⁣comparison

Büssi then addresses ‌the many negative headlines – and the jokes⁤ against Amira. “Would you also say that you did everything right?” The ⁢Zurich resident wants to get information from his intermediary. Pocher promptly: “Yes, everything is right.”

He defends his taunts against Amira “I’m just polarizing,” says Pocher.

At a certain point you have to ​talk about the children’s ⁣mother so, he defends himself. The comedian then makes a dubious comparison: Putin and Hitler also had ​mothers, ⁣Pocher points⁢ out.

Do you like Oliver Pocher?

88%

No, he is⁣ becoming more and ⁤more unsympathetic to me with his actions.

Olli and his ex Amira made their separation public ‍in August 2023. They have been officially divorced for a few months. And although​ Pocher’s ex-husband is already back in good hands, the comedian himself is still single.

After the public War of the Roses, Stefan Büsser imagines that it would ⁤be extremely difficult to get to know someone like⁤ Oliver Pocher. “You know,⁢ in three years you will be on ⁤the‌ “Bild” front and it will ​finish me,” Büssi doubts‍ the fear of women.

“I’m ⁣just polarizing, I’m used to that.”

After the conversation about Amira, the conversation turns to⁣ other ⁤controversial topics. The 46-year-old makes fun of religion and circumcision. He also states that he ⁣does not ‍drink alcohol⁣ and underlines his⁣ argument as follows: “When the ‍pressure arises, I will say that I am a ⁢Muslim.”

Stefan⁢ Büsser received a lot of negative reactions regarding Oliver Pocher’s appearance on​ “Late Night Switzerland”. The Swiss ⁢presenter informs ⁤his guest of this fact. But Pocher is‌ not impressed with this either. ​He simply said: “I’m just polarized, I’m used to that.”

More on ​the⁣ subject:

ModeratorMotherOliver PocherStefan Büsser
Interviewer: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re diving deep into​ the world of celebrity controversies and personal narratives. Joining us is Dr. Lena Schneider, a renowned sociologist specializing in media influence and celebrity culture.⁤ Dr. Schneider, thank you for being here.

Dr. Lena Schneider: Thank you for ​having me! I’m excited to discuss this intriguing topic.

Interviewer: Let’s talk about Oliver ⁢Pocher’s recent appearance on “Late Night Switzerland.” He ​discussed his divorce from Amira Aly ‌and made several provocative statements that stirred⁤ quite‍ a bit of conversation. What are your ⁢initial thoughts on how⁤ he handled ‍the divorce topic?

Dr. Lena Schneider: Pocher is ‌known for his polarizing approach, and this interview ⁣was no exception. By ‌framing his divorce as a turning ⁤point⁢ toward a more positive future, he not only deflects any ⁣responsibility but ​also positions himself as a victim of circumstance. ⁤This tactic can resonate with ​audiences who might ​empathize​ with his situation.

Interviewer: Absolutely. When host Stefan Büsser suggested that 2023 might be a “shitty year” for him, Pocher responded, “after that it only goes uphill.” It’s a classic ‍case of humor ⁤masking ‍pain, wouldn’t you ‍say?

Dr. Lena Schneider: Precisely! His humor acts as a shield—diverting attention from the emotional weight of a divorce. Comedians often use exaggeration and humor to cope with personal issues, and this is a prime‍ example. However, it also raises questions about the healthy expression of feelings.

Interviewer: Speaking of humor, Pocher made⁣ some⁢ controversial comparisons, including mentioning notable figures with problematic legacies like Putin and ​Hitler while⁢ discussing his children’s mother.​ What do you think of this rhetorical strategy?

Dr. Lena Schneider: That was definitely striking and can ⁤be seen as a way to​ evoke shock value. ‍Such comparisons ​are disturbing and can be interpreted as a desperate attempt to make a point, although many would argue it trivializes serious historical figures. It also plays into⁣ the clickbait culture we have right now—what can provoke the most outrage to generate attention?

Interviewer: And it ‌certainly has rattled ⁣some viewers. A survey indicated that 88% of respondents found Pocher increasingly unsympathetic. ‌How does public perception shift regarding​ figures like Pocher who thrive on controversy?

Dr. Lena Schneider: Public perception can be quite fickle. While controversy can build a person’s brand⁤ initially, over time, continual offensive remarks can alienate ⁣audiences. Pocher’s reliance on shock humor may⁤ backfire if ​it disengages the very fans who initially found him appealing.

Interviewer: It seems that balancing controversy with relatability is crucial then. Would you say there’s a point where a celebrity’s actions⁤ could lead ⁢to irreparable damage to ⁤their public image?

Dr. Lena Schneider: Absolutely. If a celebrity continuously crosses boundaries—especially concerning sensitive topics—they risk being ostracized. The key is to remain insightful rather than descent into⁣ mere sensationalism. ⁤Once ⁤perception shifts from intrigue to ⁢resentment, recovery becomes a more significant challenge.

Interviewer: Valuable insights, Dr. Schneider. As we wrap up, do you think Pocher’s provocative remarks are a sign of the times, or do you foresee a shift back towards more⁣ nuanced, respectful discourse in entertainment?

Dr. Lena Schneider: We’re in a fascinating period ⁢where the interplay of social media, celebrity culture, and public accountability is evolving rapidly. While we may witness a backlash against outright insensitivity, I believe humor will always have its‍ place—albeit ⁢with a growing expectation for empathy and understanding ​woven into the⁤ narrative.

Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Lena Schneider, for sharing your expertise with us. The dynamics of celebrity culture continue to captivate and challenge us. We‍ look forward to seeing​ how this conversation evolves in the future!

You may also like

Leave a Comment