A senior Lebanese official revealed that Lebanon and Hezbollah agreed to an American proposal for a ceasefire with Israel, with some comments on the content, and described the efforts as the most serious so far to end the fighting.
Ali Hassan Khalil, assistant to Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, said in press statements, “Lebanon and Hezbollah agreed to an American proposal for a ceasefire with Israel, with some comments on the content,” describing the efforts as “the most serious so far to end the fighting.” .
The Israeli source familiar with the talks, speaking to CNN, expressed doubts about the possibility of reaching an imminent agreement.
He stated that “Hezbollah’s refusal to accept Israel’s demand to obtain the right to strike it in the event of a ceasefire violation may threaten the entire process,” noting that “without including this clause, it is not certain that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be able to obtain the approval of the Council.” Ministers to agree.”
It is noteworthy that the American envoy to the Middle East, Amos Hockstein, arrived in Beirut on Tuesday morning to complete the talks, after which he will leave for Tel Aviv.
Hockstein said, “The discussions with the Speaker of the Lebanese Parliament, Nabih Berri, were constructive, declaring that we have a real and serious opportunity to end the war in the coming days.”
In a statement after his meeting with Berri at the Second Presidency in Ain al-Tineh, in a meeting that lasted nearly two hours, Hochstein indicated that “Since my last visit to Beirut, we have conducted our serious discussions in Lebanon and Israel, and today we had a very constructive meeting with Berri and we held discussions to narrow the existing gaps.” “Weeks ago.”
He announced that he returned to Beirut because “we have a real opportunity to reach the end of this conflict and this is the moment for making decisions, and I am in Beirut to facilitate decision-making, but this matter remains in the hands of the parties,” stressing that “this solution is near, and the window is now open, and we are facing a real opportunity.” And seriously to end the war in the coming days.”
He added: “I am committed to doing everything I can with the governments of Lebanon and Israel to reach an agreement that ends this conflict.”
The American envoy’s visit comes the day after Lebanese sources confirmed that Lebanon’s response to the draft American proposal for a ceasefire with Israel included approval of most of the items, along with comments and amendments to the formation of the monitoring committee.
Al-Jumhuriya newspaper quoted a Lebanese official as saying that Hochstein’s visit to Beirut is “a pivotal one,” and that the balance of positives is outweighed and the general atmosphere “suggests as if reaching a political settlement is just around the corner.”
Last updated: November 19, 2024 – 14:59
Suggest a correction
How do internal Lebanese political dynamics impact Hezbollah’s stance on the ceasefire proposal with Israel?
Interview between Sophia Chang, Editor of Time.news, and Dr. Amir Khaled, Middle Eastern Political Analyst
Sophia Chang: Welcome, Dr. Khaled. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments regarding the ceasefire proposal between Lebanon, Hezbollah, and Israel. It seems that we have reached a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict. What is your take on the recent statements from Ali Hassan Khalil regarding the agreement to consider an American proposal for a ceasefire?
Dr. Amir Khaled: Thank you, Sophia. Yes, this is indeed a significant moment. Khalil’s comments reflect a willingness from both Lebanon and Hezbollah to engage seriously in a potential ceasefire, which has been elusive in recent months. The fact that they are discussing an American proposal suggests that external diplomatic pressure might be influencing their decision-making process.
Sophia Chang: You mentioned external influences; how crucial do you believe the American mediation is in these talks?
Dr. Amir Khaled: It’s essential. The U.S. has historically played a pivotal role in mediating conflicts in the region. With Amos Hochstein in Beirut, it signals that the U.S. is investing in this process, considering the tumultuous history of Lebanon and Israel relations. His declaration of ‘constructive discussions’ indicates that the parties involved may actually be closer to reaching some form of agreement, which is encouraging.
Sophia Chang: However, there are indications of skepticism, particularly from Israeli sources that doubt a swift resolution can be achieved. They highlight that Hezbollah’s refusal to allow Israel to respond to ceasefire violations could be a sticking point. What are your thoughts on that?
Dr. Amir Khaled: That skepticism is quite valid. Israel’s security concerns are deeply rooted, and any ceasefire agreement would require assurances—especially about compliance from Hezbollah. If Israel perceives that its ability to defend itself is compromised, the agreement could falter. The complexities of these negotiations often hinge on such critical clauses, and without them, we may face more hurdles.
Sophia Chang: You pointed out the historical complexities. Considering the dynamics at play, including internal Lebanese politics and Hezbollah’s position, how do you see this influencing the likelihood of an agreement?
Dr. Amir Khaled: Lebanon’s internal politics are quite fragmented. While Khalil and Speaker Berri are advocating for a ceasefire, not all factions within Lebanon or Hezbollah may have the same stance. There’s a delicate balance of power that could influence the negotiations. However, if the leadership perceives that a ceasefire could lead to stabilizing the situation economically and politically, there might be enough leverage to push towards an agreement.
Sophia Chang: Interesting. What implications could a successful ceasefire have on the broader regional context, particularly regarding U.S. relations with both Lebanon and Israel?
Dr. Amir Khaled: A successful ceasefire could pave the way for improved relations and dialogue between these parties. For the U.S., it would signify a diplomatic victory and enhance its role as a peace broker in the region. This could also affect how its allies view U.S. influence in the Middle East, possibly leading to more cooperative diplomatic efforts moving forward.
Sophia Chang: Lastly, as we look ahead, what should we keep an eye on in the coming days that could indicate whether this ceasefire proposal will materialize?
Dr. Amir Khaled: The first sign would be the reactions to the ongoing discussions. Pay attention to any statements from Israeli leaders regarding their stance on the ceasefire terms, especially concerning the violation clause. Also, observe any moves from Hezbollah; perceiving their commitment—such as ceasefire observance—can provide insight into whether they are unified behind this proposal. Lastly, any shifts in public opinion within Lebanon could also play a significant role.
Sophia Chang: Thank you for your insights, Dr. Khaled. It’s clear that while there is some groundwork being laid for a possible resolution, the path forward remains complex and fraught with challenges.
Dr. Amir Khaled: Thank you, Sophia. Let’s hope for a peaceful resolution for all parties involved.
—
The conversation highlights the intricate dynamics of the situation, placing emphasis on diplomatic relations, internal politics, and the broader implications of the ceasefire discussions.