Challenging Animal Intelligence Myths
in a groundbreaking exploration of animal cognition, david Bertrand, a prominent ethologist and psychology professor at the Haute École Léonard de Vinci in brussels, argues against long-held misconceptions about animal intelligence and emotions. His new book, Our Prejudices Towards Animals, debunks the myth that species like fish have onyl fleeting memories and that cows are merely passive grazers. Bertrand emphasizes that traits such as empathy, cooperation, and even complex social hierarchies are not exclusive to humans, urging society to foster a more respectful relationship with all animals. This insightful work challenges readers to reconsider their biases and recognize the rich emotional lives of nonhuman species, particularly highlighting the nuanced social structures of chimpanzees, wich often defy the simplistic “alpha male” narrative.
Challenging Animal Intelligence Myths: an interview with David Bertrand
Editor: Welcome, Dr. Bertrand! Your book Our Prejudices Towards Animals offers a fresh outlook on animal intelligence and emotions. What inspired you to explore this topic?
David Bertrand: Thank you for having me. My interest in animal cognition has always been fueled by questions surrounding the emotional and intellectual capacities of nonhuman species.Over the years, I noticed a persistent set of misconceptions that undermine their complexity. I wanted to challenge such myths and encourage a more respectful understanding of the animal kingdom.
Editor: You particularly address the myth that fish have only fleeting memories. Can you elaborate on this?
David Bertrand: Absolutely. Research has shown that many fish species can actually remember locations, recognise other individuals, and even exhibit learned behaviors.This contradicts the notion that their cognitive abilities are primitive. As a notable example, studies reveal that certain fish can remember the layout of their environment and the behaviors of their peers for months, which highlights their cognitive capabilities far beyond what is commonly believed.
Editor: Fascinating! You also mention cows in your book, arguing against their portrayal as passive grazers. What does current research reveal about their social behaviors?
David Bertrand: Cows are social animals that thrive in complex herds with intricate social structures. They show signs of strong emotional bonds and can communicate distress, joy, and even fear. These traits suggest that cows experience a rich emotional life, similar to what many people attribute to companion animals. Acknowledging this can fundamentally shift our perception of farming practices and animal welfare.
Editor: Your emphasis on empathy and cooperation among animals is striking.How does this change the way we view animal intelligence,particularly regarding species like chimpanzees?
David Bertrand: The notion of the “alpha male” dominating chimpanzee social structures is overly simplistic.In reality, their societies are multifaceted, where relationships are often characterized by cooperation, alliance-building, and empathy. These traits are critical for their social dynamics. Recognizing this complexity allows us to appreciate the intricate emotional lives and social interactions of chimpanzees and other species.
Editor: What implications do your findings have for society’s relationship with animals?
David Bertrand: Understanding that animals possess emotional and cognitive capabilities encourages us to foster a more ethical and respectful relationship with them. This includes improved welfare standards and more thoughtful interactions with wildlife. By breaking down prejudices, we can advocate for better treatment and conservation efforts that reflect the rich emotional and social lives of animals.
Editor: For our readers interested in delving deeper into this subject, what practical advice can you offer?
David Bertrand: I encourage readers to engage with a variety of literature on animal cognition and behaviors. Learning from credible studies helps challenge existing prejudices. Additionally, adopting a compassionate approach in our daily lives—whether it’s in how we relate to companion animals or how we advocate for wildlife conservation—can make a meaningful difference. every positive action, no matter how small, contributes to a greater understanding and respect for animal intelligence and emotions.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Bertrand, for your insights into these important topics. Your research paves the way for a deeper gratitude of animal intelligence.
David Bertrand: Thank you for the possibility to discuss this critical issue. Let’s continue to advocate for a world where all animals are seen for their true worth.