2024-01-30 12:44:20
Class 1 veteran higher collegial bias, unfairness
The defendants – the “representative” of Orkhan Gylman oglu Babayev, sent to the court by the judge of the Baku Administrative Court Orkhan Hasanov, the fake lawyer and representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Alirza Habilov, the representative of the Special Conditions Appointment Center Branch of the DSMF, the Department of Legal Disputes created against the Constitution within the DSMF – It has been 2 years since he considered the claim impossible by the order of the lawyer’s office No. 39. The basis of the impossibility is the decision of 15.02.2019 on the impossibility of the false lawsuit drawn up by Alirza Habilov, a member of the disciplinary commission of the Supreme Court, on behalf of Ilgar Jabbarov, the judge of Sheki IIM.
Regardless of whether the decision on the impossibility of the claim is false or true, according to paragraph 8.3 of the Decision of the Supreme Court Plenum dated 10.04.2015 “On the possibility of a claim in administrative court proceedings”, it does not exclude filing a claim on the same subject again, the principle of uniformity of judicial practice is 5 years (administrative) the judiciary is not allowed to understand. Alirza Habilov, a member of the disciplinary commission of the Supreme Court, private lawyer Alirza Habilov, entered into non-procedural relations with the courts as a lawyer and authorized representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs without a legal document, abused his position in the Supreme Court and prohibited the right of a citizen gas to judicial protection. Look at the criminal abuse of office, Alirza Habilov Sheki ordered Navahid Abbasov from the office of Ismayilli (?-Supreme Court has moved to my brother Ismayilli?- MB) office to write the cassation appeal of Karabakh veteran, Alirza Habilov, not to write the appeal. And the lawyer from Ismayilli wrote the complaint after 8 months. Alirza Habilov was not satisfied with this, he banned the participation of the lawyer of the Ghazi, Navahid Abbasov, at the meeting of the Supreme Court judge Kamaladdin Badalov dated 12.02.2020, but he himself, as the authorized representative and lawyer of the opposing side, defended the “rights of the Ministry of Internal Affairs at the highest level” in such a way that the judge of the supreme court of the lawyer made a decision that a cassation appeal is not considered possible on the basis of filing the complaint late. This decision dated 12.02.2020 has not yet been given to the claimant veteran. But Alirza Habilov accepts the decision that this lawsuit and cassation are not considered possible in all courts as a “prejudicial act”, a constitutional law.
The judge of the Baku IM Orkhan Hasanov could not avoid being biased and unfair with the non-procedural order of Alirza Habilov and his “representative” Orkhan Babayev, and he even applied the decision of the Sheki IM on 15.02.2019 to the pension branch of the DSMF, which is not a party to the case. .
What about the appellate court? The IC of the Baku Court of Appeals – Sharafat Mammadova, Parviz Huseynov and Jahangir Yusifov, with two separate presidencies on the same case, did not secure the application for security with a lawyer for 6 months, nor did they consider the case. More than 10 objections to this panel have not yet been considered.
And the supreme authority? The panel of the Supreme Court consisting of Nigar Rasulbeyov, Ilgar Huseynov and Kamaladdin Badalov (?) explained the requirements of articles 23.2 and 96.1 of the Criminal Procedure Code twice in a letter to the Baku Court of Appeal, but the biased and unfair panel did not understand. The case was not reviewed, and it was not possible to file a cassation complaint because a lawyer was not allocated at the state’s expense on the grounds of “abuse of rights” and “legal equality of the parties”. Also, the panel of the Supreme Court, consisting of Nigar Rasulbeyova, Ilgar Huseynov and Kamaladdin Badalov, with 2 separate chairmen, considered the refusal to assign a lawyer legal by 2 supreme acts. (?) And without considering the case, he “considered the case”, (both 2) returned the case directly to the Baku Administrative Court. Why not to the appeal instance, but directly to the first instance? Even though, as the higher instance itself stated, according to Article 23.2 of the IPM, there is a 1-year appeal period? After all, the cassation complaint of the veteran was banned, the lawyer was not assigned to write the complaint, which complaint and which case did the higher instance “consider”? Is there such a right, such a social security, the right to judicial protection?
At the root of the bias and injustice of the Supreme Court are the many complaints of the Gazi to the higher state authorities for not giving the “supreme” decision made by Kamaladdin Badalov on his own for 4 years by the order of Alirza Habilov, the lawyer of the Supreme Court dated 12.02.2020 (or?). These days, appeals were made to the Supreme Court from the PA, the Constitutional Court, the Judicial Law Council, and even the Supreme Court regarding the issuance of the 4-year-old decision. The senior staff, including Kamaladdin Badalov, shows their bitterness, prejudice, and injustice by “looking at the work” without looking at the work.
Proud Badalsoy
It will be one year and two months since PSinam Karimov was brought to the Supreme Court and the Chairman of the Judicial Law Council. It is interesting that before this arrival, making appeals to the Supreme Court in live mode and registering for admission was done at the highest level. Now both are impossible. The chairman’s reception is organized only in the regions and you can only go to the receptions in the regions. If luck allows, acceptance is considered possible. As of now, acceptance is not considered possible, just like the claim, the complaint itself…
#Supreme #Court #case #hearing #case