The Prosecutor’s Office detailed the key points of the deputy’s statement in the investigation against the former soccer player, ensuring that her testimony established that ”she was fully conscious.”
After a new review of precautionary measures, the Court of Appeals ruled preventive detention contra Jorge Valdivia, as a result of the two rape complaints he faces.
After the court’s determination, Pamela Valdesspokesperson for the Eastern Prosecutor’s Office analyzed the statements collected within the framework of the investigation into the two complaints, which determined that the former soccer player return to Rancagua Prison.
Along these lines, he detailed the key points of the statement delivered by the deputy Maite Orsini to the Public Ministry on November 11, where he explained, among other things, why he contacted the first complainant.
Did Maite Orsini’s statement influence Jorge Valdivia’s preventive detention?
Regarding the testimony of the parliamentarian,Pamela Valdés told Meganoticias: “She was very brave in coming forward to testify,and your statement is crucial to usbecause it tells us two things. One, that in this case the accused was absolutely conscious (…) because he sends messages to his ex-partner, quite long messages, a very extensive conversation, and from the way he expresses himself we can say that he was perfectly competent with all his faculties.”
Along with this, the spokesperson for the Prosecutor’s Office assured that the fact that Jorge Valdivia sent various messages to Maite Orsini also supports the complainant’s version, that “He tells us he was unconscious.which was deprived of meaning, and clearly “It coincides with the fact as a woman woudl actually notice if her partner was on the phone all the time.”
to which he added: “It also shows us something else: that deep down the accused was not in this case… I don’t know how to say it, but deep down he had a certain contempt for the victim, the truth isas he was actually talking to his ex-partner. Thus, it clearly dose give us a profile of him.”
Regarding the profile they established about the Magician, he said that “we realize that he was conscious, that the victims where not, both victims in their complaint realize that they were with alcohol, they even talk of a possible drug that has been put in their drink…And, furthermore, he realizes that he did not want to form a relationship with them, quite the opposite.”
Regarding the contact that Maite Orsini established with the first victim, the representative of the Public Ministry stated that “is to make oneself available for research“.
This article reports on an ongoing judicial process, so people identified as detained or charged should not be considered guilty or treated in this very way until they are convicted by a final sentence (Article 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code).
Gender violence: if you are a victim or witness of economic, psychological, obstetric, physical or sexual violence, you can receive free and confidential guidance at number 1455 of the National Service for Women and Gender Equality (SernamEG). You can also call +569 9700 7000 or the Safe Report Phone: 600 400 0101. If you need psychological, social or legal support, these are the Women’s Centers throughout the country.
How dose preventive detention differ from regular detention in criminal cases?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert
Time.news Editor: Good day, and thank you for joining us. Today, we’re discussing the recent developments in the case against former soccer player Jorge Valdivia, who has been ordered to serve preventive detention following two serious allegations. We have with us Dr.Laura Martinez, a legal expert specializing in criminal law. Welcome, Dr. Martinez.
dr. Laura Martinez: Thank you for having me. It’s a critical topic, and I’m glad to be here to discuss it.
Time.news Editor: let’s start with the meaning of the deputy’s testimony in this case. It was reported that her statement indicated she was “fully conscious” during the events in question.How does this factor into the legal proceedings?
dr. Laura Martinez: The deputy’s assertion of being “fully conscious” is crucial. In cases of sexual assault, establishing the awareness and consent of the victim is fundamental. It directly affects the credibility of the allegations and helps the prosecutor establish a timeline and context for the events. this kind of testimony can considerably strengthen the case against the accused.
Time.news Editor: That makes sense. Following the court’s review of precautionary measures,Valdivia’s preventive detention was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. What does preventive detention entail in such cases?
Dr. Laura Martinez: Preventive detention serves as a precautionary measure to ensure that the accused does not flee or tamper with evidence while the investigation is ongoing.it’s more about the severity of the charges and the potential risk to the investigation than guilt or innocence. In Valdivia’s situation, given the serious nature of the charges, the court deemed a preventive approach necessary.
Time.news Editor: A spokesperson for the Eastern Prosecutor’s Office mentioned that upon review, the decision was made for the former player to return to Rancagua prison. What implications does this have for Valdivia’s legal strategy moving forward?
Dr. Laura Martinez: Returning to prison complicates his legal strategy significantly. Being in custody limits his ability to prepare his defence and engage with legal counsel freely. It also raises the stakes—his defense team will need to work quickly and efficiently to respond to the prosecutor’s evidence and testimony. The credibility of witnesses, including the deputy, will be a critical aspect of the defense strategy.
Time.news Editor: Speaking of witnesses, what role does gathering multiple statements play in building a case in sexual assault allegations?
Dr. Laura Martinez: Gathering multiple witness statements can provide corroborative evidence that supports the victim’s account. It can establish patterns of behavior or corroborate specific details of the incidents. In high-profile cases like this one, where media scrutiny is intense, a robust collection of testimonies can also add weight to the case presented to the judge or jury.
Time.news Editor: As the investigation unfolds, what should we be watching for in this case?
Dr. laura Martinez: We should keep an eye on the ongoing investigation, particularly any additional evidence that may come to light, the outcomes of any pre-trial hearings, and how both sides’ legal teams adjust thier strategies. Also, the public and media response will be significant, especially given Valdivia’s fame as a former athlete.The intersection of public opinion and legal proceedings can sometimes influence how cases develop.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Martinez, for your insights. It seems this case is far from resolved, and there are numerous legal implications as it unfolds. We appreciate your expertise today.
Dr. Laura Martinez: Thank you for having me. It’s essential to stay informed about such cases, as they reflect vital societal issues regarding consent and justice.
Time.news Editor: Absolutely. We will continue to follow this story closely. Thank you to our audience for tuning in, and stay safe.