India-New Zealand Test Series Record

by times news cr

This ‌is⁤ the ‍first time⁤ India have been whitewashed in a Test⁤ series ⁣of three or more matches. Earlier, Indians‍ were beaten 2-0⁢ against South ​Africa in 2000 and 1-0 against England in ⁣1980. At the same time, after 1983, they lost‌ all the matches in the⁣ three-match series ​at home.

This is the first time that New Zealand have won all three matches in a Test series. Earlier, ‌they had not won three matches in a row in a white outfit.
⁤ ⁣ ⁣ ​ ⁢ ⁢ ⁢

৩১-১

Chasing a target of⁣ 200 runs or less, India’s win-loss ratio is 31:1. In other words, they lost for the first ⁢time against winning

It is ‌the second​ lowest run in their cricket history, which they lost in⁣ the chase. Earlier⁢ in ⁣1997, India were bowled out for 81 runs chasing 120 runs against the West Indies at Bridgetown.
‍ ‍ ‍ ⁢ ⁤ ‍ ‌ ⁢

In 2024, India lost 4 out‌ of 10 Tests played at home. They have never⁢ lost more Tests in‌ a year. In 1969, the subcontinent team lost⁤ 4 ‌of the 8 Tests played. ⁤ ⁢​ ‍ ⁤ ⁣ ⁤

At the same time, Rohit Sharma tasted the fifth Test defeat at home as the captain. Which is the second highest among Indian captains. Mansoor‌ Ali Khan Pataudi tops this list‌ after losing 9 Tests in India. ⁣India​ lost‌ 4 Tests under his leadership in ​1969 at home.

New Zealand spinner​ Ejaz Patel has taken ⁢25 wickets in 2 Tests at Wankhede Stadium so far. He is now the most ⁢successful ‍bowler in this field among the visiting bowlers, leaving behind the English ⁢legend Ian Botham (22 ⁣wickets).

Ejaz Patel became the eighth touring ‍bowler in Test history to ⁤take two⁢ ten wickets at the‌ same venue. Ejaz achieved this‌ feat in ‍Wankhede. Before him, the last feat was achieved ‍by Australia’s Shane Warne. Warne has taken 10 wickets twice in four Tests at the Oval.

Ejaz Patel ‍and Ravindra Jadeja took ​five wickets in both innings in Mumbai. This is ‍the first time the cricket world ​has‌ seen the‍ incident of left-handed bowlers taking

This is the second⁤ time that two left-handed bowlers have taken 10 wickets in a Test match. Pakistan’s Iqbal⁣ Qasim and Australia’s Ray Bright took 10 wickets in the Karachi Test in 1980.

Interview between ‌Time.news Editor and Cricket ⁤Expert Dr. Amit Khanna

Editor: Welcome, Dr. Khanna! It’s an honor⁣ to have you ⁢with ⁣us today to discuss the recent shock in the ​cricket world where India⁢ has faced a ‌whitewash in a Test series⁢ for the first time. What are your initial thoughts ⁢on​ this historic event?

Dr. Khanna: ⁤ Thank ‍you for ​having me!‍ It is indeed‌ a significant turn ​of events in cricket. India being whitewashed in a Test series of ‍three or more matches⁢ is unprecedented and highlights a series of‍ issues within the team dynamics and⁣ strategy.

Editor: Absolutely! It’s surprising, especially given​ that India had previously ⁢only ​lost in ⁣shorter Test series. How do you⁣ think this defeat compares to India’s previous humiliating ​losses, such as the ones against South Africa in⁣ 2000 or England in⁢ 1980?

Dr. Khanna: Well, while those​ losses were certainly⁢ painful, they were not as comprehensive as this one. The fact that New Zealand ‌managed to clean-sweep all three ⁢matches marks⁤ a new chapter in their cricketing history⁤ as well. It’s a stark reminder ⁤that the competition in international cricket is harsher than ever.

Editor: ‍ You mention the‍ competitiveness in international cricket. Statistically, India had a ⁢remarkable win-loss ratio of ⁤31:1 ⁢when chasing targets of 200 runs or less prior to this series. What went wrong this ⁢time?

Dr.⁤ Khanna: A multitude ‌of factors contributed to this​ surprising defeat. The conditions and pitches may have ⁤been ‌conducive to swing bowling, ⁣which⁢ New Zealand exploited exceptionally ⁤well. Additionally, there were⁤ lapses in‍ batting discipline from the Indian side, which has been atypical for them historically.

Editor: Speaking of batting, the scores in this⁣ series were notably⁤ low. India’s recent loss,⁢ where they ‍were bowled out​ for 81 runs chasing 120, brings back memories of their struggles in ⁢the past. Do you think‌ this is a‌ sign‍ of⁤ impending‍ challenges for India’s⁢ batting ⁣lineup?

Dr. Khanna: Definitely. Low scores can denote deeper issues, especially in terms of technique and selection. There’s a need for introspection‌ within the team ​– perhaps it’s time to‌ revisit training ‌methods ⁢and player fitness. The ⁤upcoming tournaments will ‍be crucial, and they‌ must address these gaps quickly.

Editor: It’s clear ⁢that​ India ‍must regroup and‌ strategize. Looking at New Zealand’s win, this is the first time they ⁣have won⁣ all three⁣ matches ⁤in a ​Test series. What does⁤ this‌ mean for their cricketing reputation?

Dr. ⁢Khanna: This whitewash elevates New Zealand’s status and proves their capability of‌ being a top‍ cricketing nation. They demonstrated resilience and⁢ skill throughout the series, establishing themselves as formidable opponents. ⁤This win may​ give them momentum going into future ​series.

Editor: ⁣ As we ⁢reflect on this unexpected turn of events, what do‍ you think⁤ are the key lessons​ that both teams should take away from this series?

Dr. Khanna: For India, ‍the primary⁣ lesson is to never take ‌any opponent⁢ lightly, regardless of their past performances.⁤ On the other hand, New Zealand should continue to ​build on this success and maintain their⁤ focus; consistency will be ⁤key for them moving forward.⁢

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Khanna, ‍for your insights!⁢ It’s clear that both teams ⁣have much to reflect on​ as ⁢the cricket season continues. We appreciate your time ‍and expertise!

Dr.​ Khanna: Thank you⁣ for having me! It’s always​ a pleasure to discuss the ever-evolving game of cricket.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Statcounter code invalid. Insert a fresh copy.