On November 17, 2023, the Russian government issued a decree allowing Roskomnadzor to include in the Unified Register of Prohibited Information sites that reveal ways to bypass the blocking of other online resources. Since March 1, a ban on the disclosure of VPN services, as well as other services for bypassing the block, which have been banned in the Russian Federation since 2020, has been in force in Russia.
What are the potential consequences of Russia’s VPN restrictions on access to information for its citizens?
Interview with Internet Freedom Expert on Russia’s New Decree Restricting VPN Services
Q: Thank you for joining us today. Can you explain the significance of the Russian government’s decree issued on November 17, 2023, regarding VPN services and online censorship?
A: Thank you for having me. The decree is significant as it empowers Roskomnadzor, Russia’s communication watchdog, to include websites that provide methods for bypassing government-imposed internet blocks in what is called the Unified Register of Prohibited Information. This effectively continues a trend that began in 2020, where the Russian government has aggressively sought to control online space and limit access to information deemed undesirable or “non-compliant” with government policies.
Q: With Russia’s ban on VPN services already in place since March 1, 2023, how does this new decree change the landscape for internet users in Russia?
A: The new decree amplifies the existing restrictions. By targeting not only the VPN services directly but also any online guides or resources that help users bypass blocks, the government is tightening its grip on internet freedom. This means that users who wish to access blocked platforms—like certain social media sites or foreign news outlets—will find it increasingly challenging to do so without falling afoul of the law.
Q: What implications does this have for digital privacy and freedom of speech in Russia?
A: The implications are profound. This decree signals a stark deterioration of digital privacy and free speech within the Russian Federation. By limiting access to tools that promote online anonymity, the government not only stifles dissenting voices but also undermines the ability of citizens to access unbiased information. It creates an atmosphere of fear among users who may wish to seek out alternatives or express their views online.
Q: Can you provide insights into how these changes might affect businesses or individuals relying on digital tools in Russia?
A: Absolutely. For businesses operating in Russia, any reliance on foreign platforms or communication tools now comes with significant risks. Companies may have to look for more localized solutions, potentially sacrificing quality and innovation to adhere to restrictive laws. Individuals who work remotely for international companies might find their access to essential tools impaired, impacting productivity and job performance. Moreover, the growing fear of surveillance may lead to self-censorship among users.
Q: What practical advice would you offer to individuals or businesses trying to navigate these restrictions in Russia?
A: First and foremost, staying informed is crucial. Individuals should understand the legal landscape and how these regulations impact their actions online. Businesses should consider implementing internal policies focused on compliance while exploring secure channels of communication that remain within legal parameters. Networking with local experts on legal compliance can also help businesses mitigate risks. Lastly, advocating for digital rights—though risky—remains a vital step in highlighting the issue to the global community.
Q: As we look to the future, how do you predict this situation will develop? Is there any hope for change?
A: The trajectory looks challenging as the Russian government seems intent on solidifying its control over digital spaces. However, international pressure, technological innovation that helps circumvent censorship, and a vigilant citizenry that continues to advocate for its rights could serve as catalysts for change. It’s essential that the global community remains aware and involved, pushing for digital freedom and support for those who resist such authoritarian measures.
Q: Thank you for your insights. It’s clear that the implications of these new regulations extend beyond just internet usage; they affect the very fabric of communication and expression in Russia.
A: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial that we continue to shed light on these developments. Awareness is the first step towards advocacy and, ultimately, change.