Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iranian Vice President for Strategic Affairs, sent a message to US President-elect Donald Trump, noting that “Iran will not be affected by the threats, but will appreciate respect.”
In a tweet on the “X” platform, Zarif wrote: “The American people, including most Muslims, clearly expressed their rejection of “a shameful year of American complicity in Israel’s crimes in Gaza and the massacres in Lebanon.”
Zarif added: “We hope that the next administration, led by Trump and De Vance, will fulfill its pledge to oppose war, and will pay attention to the clear message conveyed to the American voter of the necessity of ending wars and preventing the outbreak of new ones.”
Zarif concluded by saying: “Iran, which has demonstrated its determination and ability to confront any aggression, will not be affected by the threats, but it will appreciate respect.”
Suggest a correction
Time.news Interview: An Insightful Conversation with Dr. Leila Hassani, Middle East Relations Expert
Editor (Time.news): Welcome, Dr. Hassani. Thank you for joining us today. Recently, Iranian Vice President Mohammad Javad Zarif sent a noteworthy message to President-elect Donald Trump. What are your initial thoughts on his statement indicating that Iran will not be affected by threats but will appreciate respect?
Dr. Leila Hassani: Thank you for having me. Zarif’s message reflects Iran’s resilience and confidence in its position on the global stage. It’s a calculated response meant to convey that while the U.S. may use aggressive rhetoric, Iran is steadfast and seeks mutual respect rather than confrontation. This is particularly important as we move into a new U.S. administration that may have different diplomatic priorities.
Editor: He also referenced past American complicity in conflicts involving Israel and mentioned the need for ending wars. How does this historical context shape current U.S.-Iran relations?
Dr. Hassani: Zarif is tapping into a deep reservoir of frustration regarding U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, particularly its unwavering support for Israel. Many in Iran see this as a major obstacle to improving U.S.-Iran relations. By highlighting the sentiments of the American populace, Zarif is attempting to remind the U.S. of the divisions within their own society over foreign policy, particularly concerning Muslim-majority nations.
Editor: You mentioned the significance of the new administration. Zarif expresses hope that Trump will fulfill his pledge to oppose war. Do you think there is potential for a shift in U.S. policy under Trump’s leadership?
Dr. Hassani: The potential for a policy shift is certainly there, especially given Trump’s previous statements against prolonged military engagements. However, the complexity of international politics and the entrenched positions of various stakeholders mean that any change would have to navigate through numerous challenges. Zarif’s call for an end to wars aligns with a broader desire for peace, but whether the rhetoric translates into actual policy remains to be seen.
Editor: What role do you see public sentiment playing in this dynamic? Zarif mentioned that many Americans expressed discontent with the country’s actions overseas.
Dr. Hassani: Public sentiment is crucial. In democracies, elected officials are responsive to their constituents. Zarif’s remarks hint at an awareness that American voters may be weary of interventionist policies. If elected leaders recognize this fatigue and the growing desire for diplomacy over military action, we might see a more conciliatory approach towards Iran, which could benefit both sides.
Editor: Zarif’s statement combines themes of respect and rejection of threats. How do you think the concept of respect can be operationalized in diplomatic engagements between the U.S. and Iran?
Dr. Hassani: Respect can be operationalized through dialogue and acknowledgment of each other’s sovereignty and interests. This involves listening to Iran’s concerns, particularly regarding regional security and its nuclear program, and addressing them through negotiations rather than ultimatums. Confidence-building measures and cooperative frameworks could pave the way for more constructive interactions.
Editor: In a broader context, how do you think Iran’s posture will affect its relations with other nations, particularly in the Middle East and beyond?
Dr. Hassani: Iran’s stance will likely encourage it to strengthen ties with nations that share its views against Western policies, particularly in the region. Countries like Russia and China may embrace Iran as a key partner against what they see as U.S. hegemony. However, it could also lead to more significant regional tensions, especially with Sunni-majority states that might see a strong Iran as a direct threat.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Hassani, for sharing your insights today. It seems we are at a critical juncture in U.S.-Iran relations, and your perspective helps illuminate the complexities involved.
Dr. Hassani: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss these important issues. It’s indeed a pivotal moment, and the actions taken in the coming months will shape the future of not just U.S.-Iran relations but the broader geopolitical landscape as well.