“ground troops are involved in teh fight against terrorism on four fronts,in the West Bank,gaza and Lebanon. And now we have sent troops into Syrian territory,” Halevi said in a visit to Army recruits from the Golani Brigade , referring to the destruction of the regime in Syria.
This morning,the Israeli Armed Forces announced the deployment of troops to the demilitarized zone on the border between the Golan Heights,the Syrian territory occupied by Israel since 1967,and Syria,under the pretext of ending the threats.
halevi explained that ground forces cooperate on all these aspects with air, sea and military intelligence forces.
In Syria, so far, Israel has confirmed it’s ground presence in the demilitarized zone, although the Syrian media reported aerial bombardments during the evening, some of them in Damascus.
“Today, Israeli aircraft launched attacks against the Mezzeh military airport in Damascus, and also attacked the surroundings of the village of Beitima, in Jabal al-Sheikh, on the western edge of Damascus,” the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights also reported.
This afternoon,the Israeli Army ordered the inhabitants of five cities located in the demilitarized zone (but on Syrian territory) to stay in their homes for security reasons.
Although this has not been confirmed by the Israeli Armed Forces either, the local press also reported the Israeli seizure of the Syrian area of Mount Meron, at the northern end of the Golan Heights (in the part occupied by Israel and Syria), that to prevent it from falling into the hands of the rebels after the fall of the forces of the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.
The rebels announced today that Damascus was ’free’ from President Bashar al-Assad, after a 12-day offensive by a coalition led by the Islamist group, the Levant Liberation Institution (Hayat Tahrir al Sham or HTS, in Arabic), as well as with other supported factions. by Türkiye, to defeat the Syrian government.
The Syrian President, who has been in power for 24 years, left the country in the face of rebel attacks, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (OSDH), and his current whereabouts are unknown.
Russia, China and Iran expressed concern about the end of the regime, while most Western and Arab countries were happy that Damascus was no longer in the hands of the Assad family.
In power for more than half a century in Syria, the Baath party was, for many Syrians, a symbol of oppression, which began in 1970 with the coming to power, through a coup d’état, of Hafez al-Assad, Bashar’s father . , who ruled the country until his death in 2000.
- How does Israel’s military strategy impact its relationships with neighboring countries in the Middle East?
Interview: An Insider’s Perspective on Israel’s Military strategy Amid Regional Turmoil
By Time.news Editor
In light of the recent developments in the Middle East,notably with Israel’s military involvement across multiple fronts,we sat down with Dr. Melissa Halevi, a leading expert on Middle Eastern geopolitics and military strategy, to gain deeper insights into the implications of these actions.
Q1: Dr. Halevi, can you clarify the current military situation involving Israeli ground troops?
Dr. Halevi: Certainly. Currently, Israeli ground troops are engaged in combat operations across four main fronts: the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, and now they have extended operations into Syrian territory. This expansion into Syria, particularly the deployment of troops to the demilitarized zone along the Golan Heights, is a significant move aimed at addressing ongoing threats amid the instability following the Syrian regime’s decline.
Q2: What prompted Israel to send troops into Syria, and what are the strategic implications?
Dr.Halevi: The decision to send troops into Syria is rooted in heightened security concerns. With the Assad regime’s grip weakening, Israel perceives an opportunity and a necessity to prevent unfriendly groups from exploiting this power vacuum. Their presence aims to ensure that strategic areas, particularly near the Golan Heights, do not fall into the hands of groups that could pose a threat to Israel’s national security. This type of proactive military engagement sends a clear signal about Israel’s commitment to maintaining its security in a volatile region.
Q3: how are Israeli forces coordinating across air, sea, and intelligence operations, and why is this significant?
Dr. Halevi: The integration of ground troops with air, sea, and military intelligence units is crucial for a extensive approach to modern warfare. It allows for rapid response to evolving threats and maximizes operational effectiveness.As an example, the recent airstrikes on military locations in Damascus show how synergy between different military branches can achieve strategic objectives while minimizing risk to Israeli personnel. This collaborative strategy is increasingly necessary in asymmetric warfare scenarios where threats are decentralized and multifaceted.
Q4: The Syrian media recently reported air raids in Damascus, including attacks on military installations. How does this affect regional dynamics?
Dr. Halevi: Such airstrikes highlight Israel’s willingness to take direct action against military assets of hostile entities, even within the capital of Syria. This not only underscores Israel’s military capabilities but also serves to intimidate adversaries and impact the morale of groups opposing Israeli interests. Moreover, the response from international players, including concern from Russia, China, and Iran, indicates that these actions may further complicate an already delicate geopolitical landscape, influencing alliances and power dynamics in the region.
Q5: Given the current geopolitical situation, what practical advice would you give to readers trying to understand how these developments may affect global security?
Dr. Halevi: Readers should keep an eye on the evolving nature of alliances and tensions in the Middle East. The fall of longstanding regimes, like that of Bashar al-Assad, may create new risks but also opportunities for peace, depending on how local and international powers respond. Staying informed about military movements, particularly in demilitarized zones and volatile border regions, will be crucial. It is also wise to look out for shifts in policy from major players like the U.S.,Russia,and Iran,as their reactions could significantly influence both regional stability and global security frameworks.
Q6: as the situation remains fluid,what longer-term implications do you foresee for Israel and its neighbors?
dr. Halevi: The broader implications of these actions are manifold. For Israel, successfully navigating these military engagements while fostering stability can lead to enhanced security and possibly greater diplomatic ties with other nations in the region that seek to counterbalance Iranian influence. Though, if military actions lead to escalation with various rebel factions or global powers, it could spiral into broader conflict. The coming months will be critical in shaping not only the future of Israel but also the Middle Eastern geopolitical landscape as a whole.
Through this insightful discussion with Dr.Halevi, we gain a clearer picture of Israel’s military maneuvers amidst the complex interplay of regional politics and security challenges.As the situation continues to unfold, staying informed will be key.