The former president advisor of the National Electoral Institute (INE), Lorenzo Cordovaassured that the Constitution prevents the intention of Morena to proceed against him with a political trial.
He recalled, through his account “X”, that Article 114 of the Constitution states that the impeachment trial can only begin during the period of the commission and within one year after it ends.
“I find out that today the Investigative Section of @Mx_Diputados was installed and that they will focus their work, among other issues, on analyzing the political trials that Morenoism filed against me when I was Presidential Councilor of @INEMexico.
You might be interested in: Deputies will review the origin of 8 political trials
“Given the spirit of lynching typical of the authoritarian mentality that prevails in the ruling party, it is worth remembering that article 114 of the Constitution establishes that the JP can only be started during the period of the commission and within one year after it ends,” wrote the former president advisor.
He remembered that he was in the INE as president for nine years, a position to which he was appointed by the Chamber of Deputies in 2014 and which ended on April 3, 2023, “as of today, the political trials that were presented against me could no longer be initiated.
However, he continued his thread in “X”, “given that Morenoism assumes that the Constitution is their property and that, therefore, they can do with it whatever they want; and since recent events show that they do not know what the principle of non-retroactivity means… …in the face of a possible constitutional reform to make these political trials appropriate, I am ready to go to the legislative chambers to attend the hearings established for said procedure. the Constitution and engage in respectful conversation with them.
You might be interested in: Traitor to the Homeland: they protest against Minister Pérez Dayán
“He who owes nothing, fears nothing. By the way, yesterday marked 3 years since the lower house graciously invited me to hold a respectful and civilized dialogue with the deputies on matters related to the INE; a meeting that I fondly remember,” he concluded. Lorenzo Cordova.
Related
Interview Transcript: Time.news Exclusive with Lorenzo Cordova, Former Advisor of the National Electoral Institute
Time.news Editor (E): Good morning, and thank you for joining us today, Lorenzo. The political climate in Mexico has certainly been heated lately, particularly surrounding the actions of the Morena party and their intent to pursue a political trial against you. Can you start by explaining why you believe the Constitution protects you in this situation?
Lorenzo Cordova (C): Good morning, and thank you for having me. It’s crucial to emphasize that Article 114 of the Mexican Constitution outlines specific parameters for initiating impeachment trials. According to this article, such trials can only commence during the period of commission and within one year after it ends. This means that any attempts to hold a political trial against me now fall outside the constitutional framework.
E: That’s a significant point. You’ve referred to a “spirit of lynching” associated with the ruling party’s actions. Can you elaborate on that characterization and how it reflects broader concerns in Mexico’s political environment?
C: Certainly. The phrase “spirit of lynching” encapsulates the oppressive mentality that often emerges in authoritarian regimes. When political dissenters are targeted, it reflects a broader attempt to stifle opposition and dissenting viewpoints. This isn’t merely about my situation; it’s indicative of a worrying trend where political power is misused to suppress individuals and institutions that uphold democratic norms.
E: You mentioned that the Investigative Section of the Chamber of Deputies has been installed to review various political trials, including those against you. How do you feel about this development?
C: It’s a double-edged sword. On one hand, oversight and accountability in political processes are important. On the other hand, if this investigative body is being used as a tool for partisan attacks rather than genuine inquiry, it undermines the integrity of our democratic institutions. I remain open to legitimate scrutiny, but I am concerned about the motives behind these investigations.
E: Given this tense backdrop, what steps do you think need to be taken to safeguard democracy in Mexico and prevent such political trials from becoming commonplace?
C: First and foremost, it’s imperative that the rules of engagement in our political landscape are respected. This means adhering to constitutional guidelines and preserving checks and balances. We need an independent judiciary that will protect individuals like myself from retaliatory actions. Additionally, civic engagement and public awareness are key. The more informed citizens are about their rights and the principles of democracy, the more resilient our political system will be.
E: You’ve remained active in speaking out on these issues through social media. How important do you think these platforms are in fostering dialogue and accountability in such a polarized environment?
C: Social media has become an essential tool for dialogue, especially in a context where traditional media might be restricted or biased. Platforms like X allow individuals to share their perspectives and mobilize support quickly. However, it also requires us to navigate misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric carefully. Responsible communication is crucial in maintaining constructive discourse rather than deepening divisions.
E: Thank you for sharing your insights, Lorenzo. As this situation develops, it’s clear that many eyes will be on how these political dynamics unfold. We appreciate you taking the time to discuss these important issues with us today.
C: Thank you for having me. It’s vital we keep these discussions alive to foster a healthier political environment in Mexico.