Correio da Manhã provides space for comments in its articles, which it considers necessary for reflection, debate adn the free circulation of opinions and ideas and asks Readers to follow the basic rules of healthy coexistence and respect for others follow, promoting an surroundings of respect and esteem. fair play.
It will only be possible to comment on the news published in Correio da Manhã after the rules below have been carefully read and expressly accepted.
The possibility to comment in this space is limited to Readers and registered Readers who subscribe to Correio da Manhã Premium (“Reader”).
By commenting, the reader declares that he is the sole and exclusive holder of the rights related to this content, and is thus solely and exclusively responsible for the same content, and that he authorizes 6 Correio da Manhã to spread that content, to everyone and in any medium available.
The Reader will remain the owner of the content he sends to Correio da Manhã and by sending such content he grants a free,irrevocable,transferable,exclusive and perpetual license to use that content,in any support or format that currently exists on the market or may emerge.
It is the duty of the reader to ensure that the content they enter into the Correio da Manhã traffic spaces is not obscene, offensive or a cause of civil or criminal liability and that they do not violate the intellectual property rights of third parties. The Reader undertakes,in particular,not to use the comment spaces of Correio da Manhã for: (i) commercial purposes,namely,broadcasting advertising messages in the comments or in other spaces,outside those specifically intended for contracted advertising under the appropriate terms; (ii) disseminate hateful,racist,xenophobic or discriminatory content or that generally incites violence or the practice of illegal acts; (iii) disseminate material which,directly or indirectly,expressly or impliedly,has as its object,purpose,result,result or intent to humiliate,denigrate or damage the reputation and reputation of third parties.
The Reader expressly acknowledges that they are fully responsible for paying any fines, costs, charges, fines, penalties, compensation or other amounts resulting from the publication of their views in the Correio da Manhã traffic spaces.
The Reader acknowledges that Correio da Manhã is not obliged to monitor, edit, or view the content or opinions shared by Readers in its comment spaces. However, the editorial team of correio da Manhã reserves the right to pre-evaluate and not publish comments that do not respect these Rules.
All comments or content that the Reader may share in the Correio da Manhã comment spaces represent the exclusive and unique opinion of the author, which is only binding on him and does not reflect the opinion or position of Correio da manhã or third parties. As a Reader has distributed material in the comment spaces in Correio da Manhã it is indeed not assumed, directly or indirectly, expressly or implicitly, that Correio da Manhã had any prior knowledge of it, much less which it agrees with, validates or supports. its subject.
Correio da Manhã may, in case of violation of these Rules, suspend for a specific or indefinite period of time or even permanently ban the possibility of commenting, regardless of weather you are a subscriber of Correio da Manhã Premium or your classification.
Correio da Manhã reserves the right to instantly delete comments from Readers that do not comply with these rules without any warning or advance notice.
Correio da Manhã will automatically hide all comments one week after they are published.
– What impact does requiring registration to comment have on the quality of online discussions?
Time.news Editor: Welcome, everyone! Today, we’re diving into the realm of digital journalism and audience engagement with an expert in media ethics and online discourse, Dr. Elena Santos. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Santos.
Dr. Elena Santos: Thank you for having me! I’m excited to discuss such an importent topic.
Time.news editor: Let’s start with the role of comments sections in online journalism.Correio da Manhã has implemented a commenting system that aims to foster respect and healthy discourse. What do you think about the significance of these platforms in modern journalism?
Dr. Elena Santos: Comments sections can be an invaluable tool for engagement. They provide a space for readers to express their opinions, reflect on the news, and engage in dialog that can enhance collective understanding. Though, their effectiveness heavily relies on the ground rules set by the publication.
Time.news editor: Absolutely,and it seems that Correio da Manhã has set some clear guidelines. What do you think are the essential rules for fostering a respectful commenting environment?
Dr. Elena Santos: The basic rules for healthy coexistence, wich Correio da Manhã emphasizes, are crucial. These include respect for differing opinions, refraining from personal attacks, and encouraging constructive debate rather than simply venting frustration. Such rules help create an ecosystem where dialogue can thrive.
Time.news Editor: They also allow for a sense of accountability, as readers need to be registered subscribers to comment. Do you think this model effectively mitigates toxic interactions?
Dr. Elena Santos: Yes, requiring readers to register can deter anonymity-fueled negativity. When individuals know they are accountable for their words, they tend to think more carefully about their contributions. This step not only curates a more civil discourse but also encourages genuine engagement.
Time.news Editor: Do you believe that the exclusivity of commenting rights—limiting it to subscribers—also influences the overall quality of the conversation?
Dr.Elena Santos: Certainly! By allowing only subscribers to comment, Correio da Manhã not only creates a community of invested readers but also fosters a richer debate. Subscribers are often more informed, as they have a vested interest in the publication, which can lead to deeper discussions and more insightful comments.
Time.news Editor: That makes a lot of sense. However, some critics argue that gatekeeping can limit free expression. How would you respond to those concerns?
Dr. Elena santos: It’s a balancing act. While free expression is vital, so is creating a space that promotes constructive dialogue.By managing who can comment, publications can prioritize quality discussions over sheer quantity, which helps uphold the integrity of the discourse. It’s about ensuring that voices are contributing positively rather than detracting from the conversation.
Time.news editor: Well put! It seems that the focus is not just on allowing comments, but on cultivating an inviting atmosphere for thoughtful exchange. What advice would you give to publications looking to improve their comment sections?
Dr. Elena Santos: I would suggest three main strategies: Firstly, set clear, enforceable guidelines that encourage respectful discourse. Secondly, actively moderate the comments to guide conversations in a positive direction. invite experts or thought leaders to engage with the audience, which adds credibility and depth to discussions.
Time.news Editor: Those are excellent suggestions, Dr. Santos. Before we wrap up, what do you envision for the future of commenting in online journalism?
Dr. Elena Santos: I see a shift towards more moderated and curated comment sections where quality is prioritized over quantity.Publications will likely invest in technology to fight spam and foster healthy discussions. I also believe that as digital literacy increases, readers will become more adept at engaging in meaningful discourse, which could further enrich these platforms.
Time.news Editor: It’s an exciting prospect! Thank you for your insights today, Dr.Santos.The interplay between journalism and audience engagement is ever-evolving, and having experts like you to guide us is invaluable.
dr. Elena Santos: Thank you for having me! It’s been a pleasure discussing these important issues with you.