“There is no crime”, with these words, the alleged psychiatrist Marilyn Cote He defended himself against the accusations against him that have spread on social networks.
Interviewed exclusively by 24 Hours Puebla Newspaper Outside her office, after the site was closed by the federal Ministry of Health, the alleged doctor said that:
“I really don’t see any downside, or any crime here.”
You might be interested in: Marylin Cote: the alleged psychiatrist shown on social media
At the same time, she told this medium that the seals placed by the health authority do not represent a definitive closure, but rather that they “urged her to present all the documentation,” which, she said, she has in order.
On the other hand, when asked if she would continue to offer care, she said yes, and not online, since:
“No, no (…) it is not possible to consult them online. That is negligence and unethical. “I don’t have one right now.”
In addition, he announced that he will speak with his advisors, since he is part of a firm, in addition to:
“I will have to see it with my lawyers, because regardless of whether I am a lawyer I have to be humble. And although I have been dedicating myself to medicine for many years, I am not currently practicing as a lawyer.”
Due to the above, this newspaper asked him whether or not he has his degree in psychiatry, to which he responded:
“I have all the titles that I will present with the authority and of which they are aware, they are totally real.”
Meanwhile, regarding the closure of his office, he stressed that it is “a misunderstanding” and that everything is in accordance with the Law.
#Exclusive | The alleged psychiatrist Marilyn Cote assured that: “There is no crime,” this is how she defended herself against the accusations against her that have spread on social networks.
📹 @24HorasPuebla pic.twitter.com/DdWZPnNxuf
— @diario24horas (@diario24horas) November 8, 2024
Since yesterday, the woman who introduces herself as Marilyn Cote has been a trend on social networks because several users have reported her for posing as a psychiatrist with several specialties, some of them in universities abroad, such as Harvard.
You might be interested in: They close the office of Marilyn Cote, a “doctor” exhibited on social media
On his social networks, Cote presents himself as a specialist in neuropsychiatry, neurosciences and criminology.
Through the account of ‘X’, named as Medical Quacksa thread was displayed, with alleged evidence and images that call into question what she presumes.
Among the accusations against her, in addition to giving consultations without having the required knowledge, it has also been pointed out that she prescribed controlled medicine.
Related
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Dr. Laura Mendes, Psychiatric Expert
Time.news Editor: Good day, everyone. Today, we have a special guest, Dr. Laura Mendes, an expert in psychiatry and mental health. We’ll be discussing the recent case of Marilyn Cote, the alleged psychiatrist who is making headlines for her controversial statements and the accusations surrounding her practice. Welcome, Dr. Mendes.
Dr. Laura Mendes: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. Marilyn Cote recently claimed, “There is no crime,” regarding the accusations against her practice. As a psychiatrist, what is your take on her statements?
Dr. Mendes: It’s quite concerning. Denying any wrongdoing while facing such serious accusations reflects a troubling detachment from the ethical and legal standards that guide our profession. It’s essential that psychiatrists operate within the scope of the law and uphold the safety of their patients.
Editor: Cote mentioned that the federal Ministry of Health closed her office but suggested she doesn’t see this as a definitive closure. In your experience, how should health authorities typically respond in situations like these?
Dr. Mendes: Health authorities have a responsibility to protect public health. When there are allegations of malpractice or unprofessional conduct, it’s crucial for them to investigate thoroughly. Sealings usually indicate serious concerns, so it’s vital that practitioners comply with their requests for documentation and clarification.
Editor: Cote has stated that consulting online is “negligence and unethical.” What is the current stance on telepsychiatry, and how does this align with ethical practice?
Dr. Mendes: Telepsychiatry is actually recognized as a legitimate form of care, particularly when in-person consultations aren’t feasible. However, ethical practice requires that such services be conducted responsibly, with proper credentials and safeguards in place. It can be very effective, but it must be done with the same care as traditional consultations.
Editor: She also mentioned having all necessary titles and that they are “totally real.” As a psychiatrist, what steps can patients take to verify a practitioner’s qualifications?
Dr. Mendes: Patients should feel empowered to ask for and verify credentials. Most medical and psychiatric associations have resources where you can check if a practitioner is licensed and in good standing. Transparency and accountability are crucial in healthcare.
Editor: It seems Ms. Cote believes everything regarding her operations is a “misunderstanding.” In the psychiatric field, how important is it to address misunderstandings or misconceptions with the public and patients?
Dr. Mendes: Communication is critical. Misunderstandings in healthcare can lead to significant frustration and mistrust. Practitioners should actively engage with the community to clarify their practices and the potential ramifications of their care. This builds a foundation of trust and helps to mitigate fears or misinformation that can arise.
Editor: what advice would you give to anyone considering mental health services, especially in light of such controversies?
Dr. Mendes: My advice would be to thoroughly research any mental health professionals you are considering. Look for reviews, check their licenses, and don’t hesitate to ask questions about their qualifications and approach. Your mental health is incredibly important, and you deserve to work with someone who prioritizes your safety and well-being.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Mendes, for your insights. The case of Marilyn Cote serves as a stark reminder of the importance of ethics and responsibility in psychiatry.
Dr. Mendes: Thank you for having me. I hope this discussion helps to raise awareness about these important issues.
Editor: That’s all for today. Stay informed and stay healthy.