exactly two months, after the presentation of a complaint that sent Stockholm, Sweden and at least the whole of Europe into disarray, what has been defined as the “Mbappé case” thus seems destined to disappear as it had appeared: in an instant the fingers. This Thursday Marina Chirakova, chief prosecutor of the investigation opened on October 12 into a rape and two sexual assaults that occurred two days earlier in the hotel where the Frenchman was staying, announced that she had put an end to the investigation.
“I decided to stop the investigations for various reasons, but all linked to the fact that the evidence is insufficient”, the magistrate explained to us by phone. The decision is mine,I didn’t have enough evidence to continue the investigation. »
What where the main findings that led to the closure of the Mbappé case investigation?
Interview with Marina Chirakova: Insights on the “Mbappé Case” Investigation Closure
Time.news Editor: Thank you for joining us today, marina. The recent decision to close the investigation regarding the allegations involving Kylian Mbappé has garnered important attention. can you provide us with an overview of your findings?
Marina Chirakova: Thank you for having me. The investigation, which began on October 12 following a complaint about a rape and two sexual assaults on October 10, was comprehensive. However,after evaluating the evidence,I steadfast that it was insufficient to proceed with the case.
Time.news Editor: What were the primary factors that led to the decision to stop the investigation?
Marina Chirakova: The decision was based on multiple reasons, all centered around the lack of sufficient evidence. In legal matters, especially those as sensitive as these, it’s crucial to uphold the highest standards of proof. Without adequate evidence, continuing the investigation would not be justifiable.
Time.news Editor: This case has sparked significant media attention and controversy, particularly throughout Europe. What implications do you believe this case will have on public perception and the sports industry?
Marina Chirakova: Public perception of both the involved parties and the legal system can be quite volatile in situations of this nature. This case highlights the importance of thorough investigations in allegations of sexual violence, which continue to be a critical issue in the sports world. The closure of the investigation may lead to mixed reactions, with some applauding the judicial process, while others may feel disillusioned due to the lack of accountability.
Time.news Editor: What advice would you give to individuals who find themselves in similar situations, either as a victim or a witness?
Marina Chirakova: it is vital for anyone in such situations to come forward and report incidents to law enforcement. Engaging with legal professionals and organizations that specialize in supporting victims of sexual violence can also provide guidance and assistance. Ensuring that there is a support system in place is essential for navigating the aftermath of such experiences.
Time.news Editor: Lastly, reflecting on this investigation, what lessons can the legal system take to better handle cases of sexual violence in the future?
Marina Chirakova: The legal system must continue to prioritize sensitivity and thoroughness when dealing with sexual violence cases. Training law enforcement and judiciary members about the complexities of such cases is crucial. In addition, there should be ongoing discussions about how to support victims throughout the legal process, assisting them in feeling safe and validated.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Marina, for your professional insights into this sensitive matter.It’s crucial to keep these discussions ongoing to improve outcomes in the future.
Marina Chirakova: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this crucial topic.