The party will not support a GERB candidate for head of parliament, nor Atanas Atanasov from PP-DB
The new force in the parliament – MECH of Radostin Vasilev, will sign the declaration of the PP-DB on a sanitary cordon around “DPS – New Beginning” and Delyan Peevski.
“We unconditionally place Peevski in isolation, but we also want Dogan and Borisov,” Vassilev said on BNT and explained that his party will not impose additional conditions. This is what Slavi Trifonov and “Ima talikny narod” did, for example, who promised to sign only if the PP-DB promised to work together to remove so-called dead souls from the voter lists.
MECH will not support the candidate for Speaker of the National Assembly from GERB. He will not support Atanas Atanasov as a PP-DB candidate either, because he was unofficially seeking support from Boyko Borisov, Vassilev explained. The information about Atanasov’s nomination is unofficial, but in the past parliaments he was the deputy head of the parliament. MECH will not have its own candidate.
First of all, we must be the Bulgarian Orban. If not me, then someone from MECH. In the next elections, the entire map should be red like the USA with MECH victories, Vasilev answered when asked if he was the Bulgarian Donald Trump.
His words were about congratulating Donald Trump on his victory in the US presidential election.
Unlike some, I congratulated him sincerely, at least because we are also a conservative party, Vassilev explained his joy at Trump’s victory.
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re diving deep into a significant political development in Bulgaria. Joining us is Dr. Maria Ivanova, a political analyst and expert in Bulgarian politics. Maria, thank you for being here.
Dr. Maria Ivanova: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss the current political landscape.
Editor: Let’s get straight to the heart of the matter. We’ve recently learned that the MECH party, led by Radostin Vasilev, has declared it will not support a GERB candidate for the head of parliament or Atanas Atanasov from the PP-DB. What are the implications of this decision?
Dr. Ivanova: This is a significant move. The refusal to support either GERB or Atanasov reveals a strategic shift in alliances within the parliament. MECH’s endorsement of a “sanitary cordon” around the DPS party indicates a desire to distance itself from certain established parties, particularly in the context of governance that might compromise their principles.
Editor: Interesting. So, why would MECH choose to establish this sanitary cordon? What’s the strategic advantage for them?
Dr. Ivanova: By distancing itself from the DPS and the larger parties like GERB, MECH positions itself as a reforming force. This not only appeals to voters who are disillusioned with the traditional parties but also places MECH in a unique spot where it can attract coalitions and new supporters who are seeking change. It potentially strengthens their brand as a political alternative, particularly among younger voters.
Editor: Given Bulgaria’s complex political landscape, how could this affect future legislative decisions?
Dr. Ivanova: MECH’s move to form this cordon could lead to a more fragmented parliament. It may hinder some legislative processes, especially if they stand firm on not collaborating with the established parties. However, it might also open avenues for more innovative policies if new coalitions arise that are willing to work together to push through reforms.
Editor: You mentioned voter appeal. How do you see the public reacting to MECH’s stance?
Dr. Ivanova: Voter reactions will likely be mixed. While progressive and reform-minded citizens may appreciate MECH’s bold stance against the traditional parties, there are certainly constituents who value stability and might view this as antagonistic. It really depends on how effectively MECH can communicate their vision and whether they can deliver on promises that attract more support.
Editor: You’ve painted a vivid picture of the potential future. As we wrap up, what should we keep an eye on in the coming weeks regarding this issue?
Dr. Ivanova: Absolutely. Key points to watch will be the reactions from GERB and DPS regarding MECH’s declarations, potential negotiations for power-sharing among remaining parties, and how MECH’s support base evolves. Additionally, monitoring public sentiment will give us insight into whether this strategy pays off or backfires.
Editor: Dr. Ivanova, thank you for your insightful analysis! It’s clear that we’re in for an interesting political season in Bulgaria.
Dr. Ivanova: Thank you! I appreciate the opportunity to share my thoughts. Let’s hope for a constructive resolution to these challenges.
Editor: And we’ll be sure to keep our readers updated as this situation unfolds. Thank you for tuning in to Time.news!