The Minister of Territorial Policies, Ángel Víctor Torres, announced on Friday that they are those indicated by the entrepreneur Vittorio de Aldama during their hearing before the judge for the ‘Koldo case‘ they will present a joint case.
These legal actions will be carried out by the organization through a press conference in Moncloa after the meeting between the President of the Government, Pedro Sánchez, and the President of the Generalitat, Salvador Illa, he indicated. “Lies can’t come for free,” he said. The government members appointed by Aldama will defend themselves against the accusations “very serious”without evidence and based on “lies, fabrications, hoaxes and deceptions”, he added.
“The political agenda cannot be allowed to be set by confessed criminals”
“The Spanish Socialist Workers Party will present a joint complaint today, on behalf of all members of the PSOE and the Spanish Government cited yesterday by Mr. Víctor de Aldama in his deposition before the judge, for insults and slander. A country like Spain can’t afford it let the political agenda be set confessed criminals who defame without evidenceand then leave Soto del Real and sleep at home”, say PSOE sources.
The video of Aldama’s deposition before the judge
Víctor de Aldama is gone various owners during his statement. After almost an hour of appearing in which he detailed his relationship with several people involved in the alleged plotthe Prime Minister underlined, Pedro Sanchezand explained it commissioned and built cash deliveries to Ábalos and his advisor, Koldo García.
“So you estimate approximately 250,000 euros the sums that Mr. Ábalos could have received?”, asked the public prosecutor, to which the entrepreneur replied bluntly that it was not an approximation. “No. 250,000 euros that Mr. Ábalos received. Which he received. And 100,000 euros that Mr. Koldo received”, he specified.
The judge investigating the “Koldo case”, Ismael Moreno, agreed to send a copy of the statement of the alleged organizer of the conspiracy to the Supreme Courtwhere a case is open against the deputy and former minister José Luis Ábalos, and at the Central Education Court number 5, which is investigating the case for alleged tax fraud on hydrocarbons.
Aldama delivered a total of 665,000 euros to various members of the Government
Between the more surprising of the declarations, assured the judge of the National Court Ismael Moreno paid 400,000 euros in cash to the former Transport Minister José Luis Ábalos Yes 250,000 to his then advisor Koldo Garciaand this one sent others 15,000 euros to the Secretary of the Organization of the PSOE, Santos Cerdan.
Víctor de Aldama assured that of the 400,000 euros paid to Ábalos, 250,000 came from the mask plot and the rest from other objects.
Follow us on our whatsapp channel and don’t miss the latest news and all the news from anten3noticias.com
Ama, it raises the stakes significantly. The government must protect its reputation and ensure that trust in public institutions is maintained. Such allegations can undermine confidence in governance, making it essential for affected parties to respond decisively.
Interview: The Fallout from the ‘Koldo Case’ – Insights from Legal Expert Dr. Elena Ruiz
Time.news Editor: Welcome, Dr. Elena Ruiz, legal expert and political analyst. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the unfolding events surrounding the ‘Koldo case.’ It’s a complex situation, to say the least. Can you provide an overview of the latest developments?
Dr. Ruiz: Thank you for having me. The situation escalated when Minister of Territorial Policies, Ángel Víctor Torres, publicly announced that certain government members, named by entrepreneur Vittorio de Aldama in his deposition, are planning to file a joint complaint. This is a significant response to what they deem as serious and unfounded accusations.
Editor: Absolutely. Torres characterized these allegations as being based on “lies, fabrications, hoaxes, and deceptions.” Why is it crucial for the members of the government to respond so vigorously?
Dr. Ruiz: The integrity of public officials is paramount in a democratic society. When accusations, especially those as serious as bribery and corruption, come from someone with a questionable reputation, like de Ald