The fraction of Morena in it capital congress is open to reviewing the proposal to regulate the implementation of euthanasia in Mexico City to ensure the right to a dignified death for people with terminal illnesses.
A few weeks after Citizen Movement (MC) will take the issue to the Allende and Donceles campus, 24 HORAS consulted the morenistas on the viability of opening the analysis, debate and approval of the initiative, since they are the ones who have majority control in the Legislature.
The coordinator of the parliamentary group of Morena, Xóchitl Bravo, He assured that “it is not a party issue, it is an issue that has to do with generating better conditions.” Likewise, she admitted that “in her personal capacity as a legislator, I share the proposal because it is an issue of dignified death.”
However, the legislator from the Guinda party pointed out that it is necessary to review the proposal with the rest of the bench and dialogue with the City Government since there is coordinated work to reach the best understandings.
“We are going to review it and also make some proposals. All initiatives that have to do with guaranteeing rights are moving forward,” he said.
Meanwhile, the Morenoist deputy, Cecilia Vadillo, considered that proposals such as the decriminalization of abortion and legalization of euthanasia “are initiatives that increase the rights of the City. We would be the spearhead because it will expand the well-being of society.”
However, he agreed that “we would have to do a deep analysis of the initiative on euthanasia presented by Patty Urriza (MC), to analyze how it is seen from the Morena parliamentary group” and consider specialized rooms “so that they, the experts, dictate the route to follow on these issues.”
As a personal opinion, the legislator Yuriri Ayala, promoter of the decriminalization of abortion throughout the gestation stage in the local Congress, shared that the euthanasia initiative is something important to give a dignified death to those who suffer from a terminal illness and suffer from having the palliatives that on many occasions already They do not alleviate the pain.
“It seems necessary to me that we provide the options. The fact that it is prohibited does not mean that it will not be carried out, we will have to listen to the voices on the subject,” he stated.
As an emergency measure for people with incurable diseases, Citizen Movement (MC) presented an initiative law in local Congress to legalize euthanasia, to guarantee a dignified death without pain.
The initiative, presented by the Emecista representative, Patricia Urriza, proposes reforms to the General Health Law, as well as the Federal Penal Code in terms of dignified and painless death, to guarantee that doctors who assist in this process are not criminalized.
The proposal resumes the initiative raised by the then federal deputy, Salomón Chertorivski, in San Lazarus, that although it was ruled on in committees, it did not advance in a vote to the plenary session due to the calendar.
Related
### People Also Asked Questions
Interview Script: Time.news Editor with Euthanasia Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome, and thank you for joining us. Today, we have a very important topic to discuss—euthanasia and the recent proposal in Mexico City to regulate its implementation. We’re here with Dr. Sofia Martínez, a leading bioethics expert. Dr. Martínez, could you start by giving us some background on the current euthanasia landscape in Mexico?
Dr. Sofia Martínez: Thank you for having me. Currently, euthanasia is a complex issue in Mexico. It’s not fully legalized, though there have been movements towards recognizing the right to a dignified death, especially for individuals with terminal illnesses. The recent discussions within the Morena party highlight a growing willingness to engage with this issue, signalling a potential shift in legalizing euthanasia in Mexico City.
Time.news Editor: Yes, I’ve read that Morena is considering a review of the euthanasia proposal. Xóchitl Bravo, the coordinator of their parliamentary group, emphasized that it’s not merely a party issue but one of improving conditions for individuals facing terminal illnesses. What are your thoughts on this perspective?
Dr. Sofia Martínez: I believe this is a crucial and compassionate viewpoint. Euthanasia is fundamentally about dignity and autonomy. By framing it as a matter of rights rather than strictly a political agenda, it opens a pathway for thoughtful dialogue. This allows for a collective examination of how such a law could not only be established but also how it can effectively serve those in need.
Time.news Editor: Absolutely. There’s also the point raised by Cecilia Vadillo from the Morena party about initiatives like the decriminalization of abortion and the legalization of euthanasia serving to expand rights within the city. How do you see the intersection of these issues?
Dr. Sofia Martínez: Both issues fundamentally revolve around bodily autonomy and the right to make choices about one’s own life and health. Expanding rights, as Cecilia suggests, parallels the broader movement for social justice. Ensuring that individuals have the choice at the end of their life can be seen as part of the same struggle for agency that drives other issues like reproductive rights.
Time.news Editor: That makes sense. But you mentioned the need for thorough analysis and expert involvement, as highlighted by legislative figures in the Morena discussions. What kind of expertise is critical in shaping legislation around euthanasia?
Dr. Sofia Martínez: It’s essential to involve a diverse range of experts—bioethicists, medical professionals, legal scholars, and, importantly, patient advocates. This multidisciplinary approach is crucial for addressing ethical, medical, and legal concerns. Furthermore, real-life testimonials from patients who might consider euthanasia can offer invaluable insight into the implications of such legislation.
Time.news Editor: Given the emotional weight of this topic, what do you think are the potential challenges that legislators might face when discussing and potentially implementing euthanasia laws?
Dr. Sofia Martínez: There are several challenges. Cultural attitudes towards death and dying can greatly shape public opinion, often leading to fears or misconceptions about euthanasia. Additionally, there are ethical concerns about consent and the potential for coercion. Clear, compassionate communication and robust safeguards will be vital in addressing these fears and ensuring that any legislation truly protects the vulnerable.
Time.news Editor: Those are important points. As discussions move forward in the Morena party and with initiatives like that proposed by Patty Urriza from Citizen Movement, what are you hoping to see?
Dr. Sofia Martínez: I hope for a commitment to a careful, well-informed deliberation that prioritizes compassion and the individual’s rights. If done right, this could lead to meaningful legislation that respects autonomy and allows for humane choices. My hope is that as this initiative moves forward, it sparks broader discussions that promote understanding and acceptance around end-of-life choices.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Martínez. Your insights are invaluable as we navigate this sensitive yet important issue. We appreciate your time and expertise today.
Dr. Sofia Martínez: Thank you for having me. I look forward to seeing how this conversation develops in Mexico City and beyond.