Moscovici proposes entrusting the forecasts to an independent institute

by time news

To⁢ avoid further drift in public finances, the president of the Court ⁣of Auditors suggested to the senators to “remove the forecasting exercise from the ‍administration”.

How to avoid a new ​”inexplicable” drift in public finances? The shock caused by the ‍slide in the 2024 deficit, now forecast at 6.1% of GDP from the ⁤initial 4.9%, is giving way to solutions. Pierre Moscovici,‌ first president of the ​Court of Auditors, suggested entrusting these forecasts to « an independent ‌institution ». And since you never have the best control of yourself, he proposed on Wednesday before the Senate Social Affairs Committee that this mission be entrusted,‍ « For example »at the Superior Council​ of Public⁤ Finances (HCFP), of which‍ he is ‍also president.

Pierre Moscovici had not had this idea until then « never mentioned ‌in public (…) because it does not correspond exactly to our administrative culture » : « remove the forecasting⁣ exercise from the administration ». But this is not « totally baroque »he defended himself, remembering ⁢it « this is what ⁣a number of European partners are doing. »

This modification is « entirely desirable, because, ⁤let’s face it, I seem to read in the comments of ‍one or the other that the quality of the forecasts was decreasing »in ⁢a sort « of a ping-pong game between administration and politics ». The ⁣metaphor will not fail to resonate in the ‌ears of former⁢ ministers⁢ Bruno Le ‌Maire and Thomas Cazenave, questioned this Thursday ⁢by senators on their budget management, awaiting⁢ their appearance before the ⁣finance‌ commission of the National Assembly transformed into a commission of⁤ inquiry.

Interview Between Time.news Editor and Pierre Moscovici, President of‌ the Court of Auditors

Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, Mr. Moscovici. Thank you for joining us today. Given the recent forecast⁢ for ⁤the ⁢2024 deficit, ​which has jumped ⁣to 6.1%⁣ of GDP from an initial 4.9%, there seems to be growing concern regarding the stability of public ‍finances. What⁣ do you believe are the main factors contributing to this significant revision?

Pierre Moscovici: ⁤Good afternoon. Thank you for having me. ⁢The upward revision of ‌the deficit⁣ is indeed concerning​ and is largely ​attributed to several factors, including increased spending pressures and slower-than-expected economic recovery. This situation highlights the complexities ⁣of forecasting in an environment that is both dynamic and often unpredictable.

Time.news Editor: You mentioned the need for better forecasting. In your recent comments, you⁣ suggested ‌removing⁢ the ‍forecasting exercise from the⁤ administration and transferring it ‍to an independent institution. Can‍ you elaborate on why you believe this change is necessary?

Pierre Moscovici: Absolutely. ⁤One of the main issues we face is the potential ​bias ‌that can come from administering forecasts within the government. There‌ might be ⁤a temptation to present ​overly ‍optimistic projections to maintain public confidence or to align with political agendas. By ​transferring ‍this ⁣responsibility to an ⁣independent institution, we can‍ foster more accurate, objective, and transparent financial predictions that ​the public and⁤ policymakers ‌can rely on.

Time.news Editor: That’s an interesting perspective. What type of independent institution do you ⁣envision taking on this responsibility, ‍and how‍ can it‌ gain the public’s trust?

Pierre Moscovici: The ideal⁤ institution⁢ would be one that⁢ is established with a clear mandate, sufficient resources, and a⁣ committed staff of experts who are free from political influence. To gain public⁣ trust, it would need to operate transparently and engage with stakeholders‌ regularly.⁢ By ⁢providing ‍regular updates⁢ and‌ explanations‌ of its methodologies, the institution ‍can build credibility over‌ time.

Time.news ‍Editor: It sounds ‌promising. However, some might argue that bringing in an independent body could slow down⁣ the decision-making process. How do you respond to that concern?

Pierre Moscovici: That is a valid point. However, I believe that‍ while some initial adjustments may be​ necessary, having more accurate and credible forecasts will ultimately streamline decision-making in the long run.⁤ Policymakers will be guided by data-driven insights⁢ rather than political expediency, potentially leading to more sustainable financial strategies.

Time.news Editor: Speaking of sustainable financial strategies, what measures should be prioritized to address the ‍current financial drift?

Pierre Moscovici:​ Firstly, we‌ need to ‍ensure that ⁢public spending ⁣is efficient and⁣ targeted towards areas that will drive growth. Secondly,⁣ revising tax policies to enhance revenue​ without ‍stifling growth is crucial.‌ Lastly, investing in long-term structural reforms will be essential to improve our economic resilience and overall ‌financial health.

Time.news Editor:⁣ Thank you for those insights, Mr. Moscovici. As we stand at this pivotal moment for public finances, what ⁤message would you like to convey⁢ to our readers?

Pierre Moscovici: I would urge ​everyone to stay informed and engaged with ⁢fiscal policy discussions. Transparency and accountability‌ in government financial planning​ are not ​just crucial for the ‌recovery of our economy but are also essential for rebuilding public trust. Together, we can navigate these challenges,‌ but it requires collective ​effort and informed dialogue.

Time.news Editor: Thank you ‍for your ⁣valuable​ insights, Mr. Moscovici. Your perspective on ​these pressing‌ financial issues is greatly appreciated, and it⁢ will‌ surely inspire further discussion around⁤ public finances in ⁣the future.

Pierre Moscovici:⁢ Thank you for having me. It‌ has been a pleasure discussing ‍these important topics.

You may also like

Leave a Comment