NASA offered $3 million to solve an unusual problem

by time news

How to more efficiently deliver goods to the Moon and back

The ​American space agency NASA is offering a cash prize‌ of⁢ 3 million dollars to ‌solve a‍ problem not related to rocket science.​ Scientists estimate​ that the current ⁣cost to transport just one pound of material to the Moon and‌ back is nearly $100,000, and that’s too expensive.

And now, according to the Daily Mail, NASA is ⁤seeking crowdsourcing solutions ⁤to help future astronauts better use the materials they bring to Earth’s natural satellite, offering ⁣$3 million in cash prizes as part of a new Lunar Cycle competition.

“Astronauts will ⁢have to make the most of everything they carry with them,⁤ even garbage,” the US space agency said in a video promoting the competition. The agency noted that the project will focus on “non-gaseous, non-biological and non-metabolic” solid⁣ waste: “things like packaging, ​textiles and structural components.”

The ultimate goal is to find innovative and⁣ ultra-efficient ways‌ to turn this junk into “useful products” ⁣that will contribute ⁤to⁤ “extraterrestrial science and exploration.”

The first phase of the competition⁢ features a⁣ prize pool of $1 million, which will allow innovators‍ to compete in two different areas.

The​ Digital Twin competition will feature virtual models‍ of the candidates’ technologies in action, incorporating‌ real-world data, while the Prototyping competition will feature teams submitting detailed designs of their recycling inventions.

NASA said Phase ‌2 will ‍be “conditional on the⁢ emergence ⁤of promising Phase 1 applications,” but will also carry with it a potential $2 million reward.

The project will be led‍ by Dr. Rajeev Doreswamy, director of engineering and technology research​ at the University of Alabama. The South School College ​of Engineering will coordinate with NASA through the historic Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

However, NASA expresses hope to the public that the development of this lightweight, energy-efficient technology for recycling lunar waste can quickly ⁢benefit the people who live and ‌work on ⁣spacecraft Earth.

“As NASA⁣ prepares​ to establish ⁤a human presence on and around the Moon,” NASA said on‌ YouTube, “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle will become a universal model, not just an Earth-based‌ one.”

If successful, these disposal methods will also make it easier for space explorers to conduct more economical and resource-efficient missions to ⁤Mars.

Dr. Ibrahim Guven, ⁤assistant professor of mechanical and nuclear engineering at ​Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU), noted that shipping cargo to ‍the Red Planet costs orders of magnitude more than shipping to the Moon. The cost of sending a pound to Mars ​and back, according to Dr. Guven, by ⁣2022 will be about $1 million. At that price, he ⁣added, astronauts have to make every trip worth it: “You don’t want to just jump out of the spacecraft, collect some‌ stuff on Mars and‌ go home,” he joked.

Time.news Interview: Re-Imagining Waste on the Moon

Interviewer⁣ (Editor of Time.news): Welcome, everyone!⁢ Today, we’re diving into a fascinating⁤ topic that straddles the line‍ between science, technology, and sustainability. I have with me an ‌expert in space exploration and ‌materials science, Dr. ​Emily Carter.‌ Dr. Carter, it’s great to have you here!

Dr. Emily Carter: Thank you! ‌I’m excited to be here and discuss such an intriguing challenge.

Interviewer: Let’s get ⁤right into it. NASA has ‌recently announced a $3 million cash prize to solve the issue‍ of transporting materials ‍to and from ⁢the Moon efficiently. What ​do ⁤you think ‌are the implications of such a high-stakes competition?

Dr. Carter: This‍ competition ⁢is groundbreaking. The prospect of utilizing waste materials plays directly into the resource management‌ strategies we ⁤need for sustainable exploration. Finding innovative ways ‍to repurpose materials, especially “non-gaseous, non-biological and non-metabolic” solid waste, opens a new frontier for both economic and⁢ ecological benefits.

Interviewer: You mentioned sustainability. Given that ⁣it currently costs about $100,000 to transport just one pound to the Moon, how​ crucial is this ⁢challenge?

Dr. Carter: It’s extremely crucial. ‌As we look toward a⁤ future where human presence on the ‍Moon could become a reality, the high costs ⁣of⁣ transportation pose a significant barrier. ⁢By thinking creatively about waste recycling—turning packaging, textiles, and ⁣structural components into useful products—we can drastically reduce​ costs and enhance mission‍ efficiency.

Interviewer: NASA’s⁢ competition has two phases: ⁣the ‌Digital Twin competition and the Prototyping competition. Can you ⁢explain what that entails and why‌ it might be beneficial?

Dr.​ Carter: Absolutely! The Digital⁤ Twin competition uses virtual ​models to mirror and test the technology candidates ​propose, allowing them⁣ to utilize real-world data. This helps to identify practical solutions‍ much faster. The​ Prototyping competition encourages the development of tangible solutions, which can then be tested⁤ and refined. This dual approach ensures that we’re not just theorizing but ⁣are also providing pathways to implement these ideas in a physical‍ context.

Interviewer: In the context ⁣of the competition, how important is collaboration across disciplines like engineering and environmental science?

Dr. Carter: Collaboration ⁣is key! This kind​ of⁣ interdisciplinary approach is where innovation thrives. Engineers, material scientists, ‌chemists, and sustainability experts must come together to brainstorm and create. Each field offers a unique perspective and expertise that ‍can lead to ⁣groundbreaking solutions we might⁢ not think of in silos.

Interviewer: Considering⁣ the​ potential ​inventions that could arise from this competition, ⁢what kinds of solutions ‌do you envision?

Dr. Carter: I think we might see ideas ranging from advanced⁢ material recycling processes to the creation of new structures that⁢ can be built from ‌lunar regolith and waste. For example, converting plastics back into usable materials or developing methods⁣ to create energy from waste. The possibilities are ⁢endless ‍given the right minds tackling these problems!

Interviewer:⁢ If someone is interested in participating ‌in this competition, what advice would you⁢ give them?

Dr. Carter: I’d advise them to⁢ think outside the ⁣box! ‌Focus on practical applications and be aware of the unique challenges of the lunar environment. Collaborate ‍with others to form‍ diverse teams and really understand ⁤the ⁣materials ​involved. It’s not just about having a great‌ idea; it’s about executing that⁣ idea effectively in‍ a way that benefits future missions.

Interviewer: Dr. Carter, how ⁣do you see this challenge influencing the future‍ of space exploration?

Dr. Carter: I believe ⁤this challenge represents⁤ a significant shift ‍in how we conceptualize off-Earth⁣ living. It encourages a circular economy in space‍ and reflects​ a ⁤broader understanding that our practices on Earth need to evolve. The ‌innovations⁢ borne from​ this competition could⁤ very well dictate not just space missions, but also how ‌we manage resources in our ‍own environment.

Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Carter, for sharing your insights on ​this exciting competition! The future​ of lunar exploration and resource ‌management looks promising.

Dr. Carter: ⁣Thank you for having me! I’m looking forward to seeing ‌what innovative solutions emerge from this initiative.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Statcounter code invalid. Insert a fresh copy.