A day after the Morena benches and their allies from the PVEM and PT voted in favor of the disappearance of seven autonomous organizationsthe coordinator of Morena in the Chamber of Deputies, Ricardo Monrealassured that this figure did not respond to any demand from society and were a brake on social change.
In a video that he uploaded to his “X” account, the legislator maintained that none of the basic documents of the parties represented in the current legislature, or in previous ones, even greet them as irreducible or essential institutions of the democratic struggles in the country.
You might be interested in: Election of judges can be made in June: Monreal
“We are reaching the end of an inglorious stage, we are closing the stage of neoliberal economic institutionalism called neoinstitutionalism (sic) and rescuing the stage of Mexican social democratic constitutionalism.
“The so-called autonomous constitutional bodies, the OCAs, which were an implant, an imitation of extra logic that promoted the financial political technology that poorly governed Mexico for three decades, do not respond to any popular demand nor are they the product or impulse of large social movements or of popular movements,” said the Morenista.
These organizations, he continued, were “a constitutional glob” promoted by the international financial technocracy and its allies to put a stop to the movements of social and economic change that globalization generated in various places.
“Now we have put an end to them because they were designed in a stage in which we do not share, the neoliberal one,” he expressed.
You might be interested in: Cofece will go from an autonomous organization to a decentralized one dependent on the Economy: Monreal
Mexican constitutionalism advances: we leave neoliberal institutionalism behind and strengthen social-democratic institutionalism. The OCAS disappear, but the principles of transparency and social justice remain.
➡️ pic.twitter.com/Rxn7gcd50q— Ricardo Monreal A. (@RicardoMonrealA) November 22, 2024
EAM
Related
How is Ricardo Monreal’s approach to governance influencing the current political climate in Mexico?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Political Expert
Editor: Good morning, and welcome to Time.news. Today we have the privilege of sitting down with Dr. Elena Ramirez, a political analyst and expert on Mexican governance. Dr. Ramirez, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Ramirez: Good morning! It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. Recently, the Morena benches, along with their allies from PVEM and PT, voted in favor of dissolving seven autonomous organizations. What motivated this significant change in policy, particularly from the perspective of Ricardo Monreal?
Dr. Ramirez: Yes, this is indeed a pivotal moment in Mexican politics. Ricardo Monreal, the coordinator of Morena in the Chamber of Deputies, expressed that these autonomous organizations were not meeting societal demands and were viewed as obstacles to social change. This reflects a broader ideological shift away from what he describes as neoliberal institutionalism toward a more social democratic approach.
Editor: Monreal mentioned that these bodies were not even acknowledged in the foundational documents of the parties in power. How does this shape our understanding of their role in Mexican democracy?
Dr. Ramirez: It underscores a significant disconnect between these autonomous bodies and the political landscape. By Monreal stating that they were “an imposture” or an ”imitation” of extra governmental entities, it reveals a belief that these organizations did not resonate with the democratic struggles and aspirations of Mexican society. In essence, he’s signaling that these institutions, rather than being indispensable, were perceived as outdated.
Editor: That’s a critical perspective. You also mentioned that Monreal stated, “We are closing the stage of neoliberal economic institutionalism.” Can you elaborate on what he means by that, and why this is relevant now?
Dr. Ramirez: Absolutely. Monreal’s statement suggests that the current administration aims to dismantle the frameworks established by previous neoliberal policies that prioritize market solutions over social equity. The push toward social democratic constitutionalism is an attempt to realign governance with more equity-driven policies that favor broader societal welfare, which many believe has been neglected in recent decades.
Editor: Interesting. Given this context, what can we expect in terms of implications for governance and civil society in Mexico?
Dr. Ramirez: This shift could have sweeping effects on governance. If the Morena-led government continues on this trajectory, we may see a restructuring of how institutions operate, potentially leading to more direct accountability to the public. However, it could also result in tension as critics may perceive this as an erosion of checks and balances, leading to a more centralized power structure.
Editor: And what about civil society’s response? With these autonomous organizations being dismantled, how might they react, and what implications could this have for activism?
Dr. Ramirez: Civil society may react strongly to this change, as many see these bodies as vital watchdogs in the democratic process. Activist groups could mobilize in opposition, leading to a critical dialog around the balance between state oversight and independence. There’s a risk of civil pushback against possible government overreach, which could catalyze a new wave of activism focused on preserving democratic norms.
Editor: So, it seems we’re at a crossroads. In the context of democratic governance, what would you advise stakeholders to consider as this unfolds?
Dr. Ramirez: Stakeholders must prioritize transparent dialog and ensure that reforms include diverse voices from various sectors of society. The challenge is to foster a governance model that genuinely reflects the people’s needs without compromising the institutional safeguards that protect democracy. This careful navigation will be crucial as we move forward.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Ramirez, for such insightful commentary. As the situation develops, we will certainly be watching closely and looking to you for further analysis.
Dr. Ramirez: Thank you for having me! It’s an important conversation, and I look forward to discussing it in the future.