After more than three months of hearing, last Sunday, Sunday 17, Judge Richard Concepción Carhuancho, of the First National Preparatory Investigation Court, began to read his resolution on the requirement of preventive detention for 36 months in against the brother of the president Dina Boluarte, Nicanor Boluarte, the lawyer Mateo Castañeda, and four others in the framework of the case of ‘Los Waykis en la Sombra’.
Judges decide TODAY whether to issue preventive detention against Nicanor Boluarte
Judge Richard Concepción Carhuancho assesses the requirement for 36 months of preventive detention for Nicanor Boluarte, brother of President Dina Boluarte, the main person involved in the Case of Los Waykis en la Sombra.
The magistrate will decide whether or not to issue preventive detention against Nicanor Boluarte. Therefore, this Monday, November 18, the hearing continues in the First Preparatory Investigation Court of the National Supreme Court, where the flight risk of the defendants, including the president’s brother, is assessed.
As it is known, on August 21, the Judges held a hearing to evaluate a request from the Prosecutor’s Office against the members of the alleged criminal organization that used wardens and subordinates to achieve the registration of the party Ciudadanos por Peru.
In addition to Nicanor, the need of the prison includes Mateo Castañeda (former lawyer of Dina Boluarte), Jorge Ortiz Marreros (former director general of the Interior Government), Zenovia Herrera Vásquez (in charge of recommending legislators and sub-legators), as well as the brothers Jorge and Noriel Chingay Salazar, who were allegedly in charge of demanding the money in exchange for appointments in Cajamarca.
I MAY BE INTERESTED
How might public perception of the judiciary change following the outcomes of high-profile cases like Boluarte’s?
Interview between the Time.news Editor and Legal Expert
Time.news Editor: Good day, and welcome to Time.news. Today, we’re diving into a high-profile legal case that has captured the attention of many in Peru and beyond. With us is Dr. Sarah Mendoza, a legal expert and professor specializing in criminal law. Dr. Mendoza, thanks for joining us.
Dr. Sarah Mendoza: Thank you for having me. It’s great to be here.
Editor: Let’s get right into it. The case of Nicanor Boluarte, brother of President Dina Boluarte, has been making headlines due to the allegations surrounding “Los Waykis en la Sombra.” Can you explain the significance of this case?
Dr. Mendoza: Certainly. This case highlights potential high-level corruption and influences within the government. The allegations against Nicanor Boluarte and others suggest they may have been involved in serious criminal activities that undermine public trust in government institutions. The outcome of this case could set important precedents for how such cases are handled in the future.
Editor: Judge Richard Concepción Carhuancho has initiated the resolution on the preventive detention of Boluarte and others. What does preventive detention imply in this context, and why is it significant?
Dr. Mendoza: Preventive detention is a legal mechanism that allows authorities to keep individuals in custody before trial, typically to prevent them from fleeing, committing further crimes, or tampering with evidence. In this case, a 36-month preventive detention is being requested, which is quite serious. It indicates that the judge believes there are substantial grounds for the charges and that the accused might pose a flight risk or otherwise hinder the investigation.
Editor: We’ve seen the sense of urgency in the justice system, especially with the mounting public interest. How do you think this case may affect public perception of the judiciary and government accountability?
Dr. Mendoza: The judicial system’s actions in high-profile cases like this one are crucial for public trust. If the judiciary can demonstrate its independence and commitment to justice, it could enhance public confidence. Conversely, if there are perceived failings—such as undue influence or delays—it could lead to greater skepticism towards the government and its institutions.
Editor: With the backdrop of a politically charged atmosphere in Peru, how might this case influence the broader political landscape, especially for President Dina Boluarte?
Dr. Mendoza: This case could have significant ramifications for Boluarte’s presidency. If her brother is found guilty or implicated in serious crimes, it could reflect poorly on her administration, potentially fueling opposition efforts or leading to calls for accountability. On the other hand, how she navigates this situation could also impact her political capital—being transparent and supporting judicial processes may help bolster her image in the eyes of some sectors of society.
Editor: There’s a lot at stake here, socially and politically. As we await the judge’s final decision, what will be the key factors to watch for as this case unfolds?
Dr. Mendoza: I’d say the key factors will include the strength of the evidence presented, the arguments made by the defense, and the public and media response. Also, any potential implications for other ongoing investigations into corruption in Peru. The public discourse surrounding this case will also be telling, as it may reflect broader societal issues related to governance and trust in public institutions.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Mendoza, for shedding light on this critical moment in Peru’s legal and political landscape. It will certainly be interesting to see how this develops in the coming days.
Dr. Mendoza: Thank you for having me. It’s a pivotal moment, and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss its potential implications.
Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay with us for updates on this unfolding story as it continues to develop.