Parliament extends system tests despite criticism

by time news

A specific permanent contract ‌designed for people very far from the job market: ​a hypothesis of experimental job ​placement “shared⁣ time” ‍it was extended⁢ on Wednesday 6 November by a vote in Parliament, despite ⁤fears from the temporary work sector.

“Part-time employment contract for employability purposes”more commonly known as ​“CDI-FE”. This little-known system, launched in⁤ 2018 on an experimental basis,‍ was extended for four years​ by a final vote of the Senate.

Dedicated to a very ⁢specific audience, in the process ⁤of insertion ​or reintegration ⁣(young, elderly, long-term unemployed,⁤ etc.), this type of‍ contract allows an employee to be hired by a‍ company specialized in shared ⁢work,⁤ which can then place him available to⁢ other structures ⁤for the execution of missions.

Read also: Article reserved for our subscribers ​ ⁣⁢ The⁣ temporary worker is testing a ⁢new permanent contract

Once ⁢the CDI-FE experience ‍ends in 2023, the bill by MoDem deputy Nicolas Turquois, adopted identically in‍ January by the‌ National Assembly, intends to⁣ relaunch ⁢it for four years, readjusting its scope. “Proposing to perpetuate the ​CDI-FE ⁢as it exists ⁣would have been imprudent. Abandoning the experiment‍ would have been⁤ a waste.”the‍ minister for disabled people, Charlotte Parmentier-Lecocq, summed up the⁢ text in favor of the text.

“Finish”

However, several parliamentarians ‌have noted the situation “controversial” ‍ around this system‍ due to⁣ the difficulties in evaluating it: since 2018 only 5,000 CDI-FEs​ have been signed, This was‌ stated in a report by the General Inspectorate‌ of Social Affairs (IGAS) dating back ⁢to 2023, but⁤ published only‌ in the last few days.

Read also | Article‌ reserved for our subscribers ​ ‌ ⁤ The “CDI ⁤employability” promoted by La Poste

The temporary work sector ​rebelled against this specific contract. In a letter sent to senators on Tuesday ​evening, consulted by Agence France-Presse, most of the sector’s unions underlined the “benefits” of ⁤the⁢ device, which “they make‍ them very attractive‌ for user companies ⁣and ​likely to destabilize” employees with another type of contract, the fixed-term CDI (CDII).

The left, ​a minority in the Senate, took up‍ these ⁣arguments again, denouncing‌ the socialist Monique⁢ Lubin ⁤ “a blow to⁣ labor law to⁤ satisfy ‍questionable managerial policies”.

The⁣ right and the⁤ centrist ranks have instead ⁣defended this model, which “offers flexibility to businesses in an uncertain economic ⁢context”according to Les Républicains senator Frédérique Puissat. The latter wanted to reassure about the text voted by Parliament, which tightens the eligibility criteria ​ “Best goal” the interested‍ public and strengthens workers’ rights ⁣compared‌ to the‌ initial experiment.

Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers ‍ Employment of the elderly: negotiations stumble over the idea​ of ⁣​​a permanent contract reserved for ⁣the ⁢elderly unemployed⁢

The world with⁣ AFP

​ ‌ ⁣ ‌ Reuse ⁢this content

Time.news Interview: Exploring the CDI-FE with Employment⁢ Expert ⁤Dr. Laura ⁤Grenier

Time.news Editor: Good day, everyone! Today, we have a special guest, Dr. Laura Grenier, an employment policy expert with a focus on labor market integration strategies. She’s here ⁢to discuss the ⁤recent extension of the CDI-FE, also known as ​the part-time⁢ employment​ contract aimed at enhancing employability. Thank‌ you for joining us, Dr. Grenier.

Dr. Laura Grenier: Thank you⁢ for having me! ‍It’s a pleasure to be here.

Time.news Editor: Let’s dive right‌ in. The CDI-FE was introduced in 2018‍ and has ‍recently been‌ extended for another four years. What exactly does⁣ this⁢ contract entail, and who is it⁢ primarily designed for?

Dr. Grenier: The CDI-FE is a⁢ specific type of​ permanent‌ contract tailored for individuals who are often ⁢distanced​ from the job ‍market — such as young workers, the elderly, or⁤ the long-term unemployed. Under‌ this ​arrangement, employees‌ are hired ⁤by a company specializing in ⁤shared work but can be⁣ placed with various other organizations for executing different missions. Essentially, ‌it provides a pathway toward employment for those who ⁢need it the most.

Time.news Editor: That’s quite interesting! However, ⁤the temporary work sector seems to have concerns about this ⁣contract. Can you​ elaborate​ on those fears?

Dr. Grenier: Absolutely. Many in the temporary work sector worry⁣ that the ⁣CDI-FE may destabilize current employment structures, particularly ‌for those on fixed-term contracts. ⁣Unions have expressed that while the CDI-FE appears beneficial for companies‍ looking for flexibility, it can attract ⁣users away from‌ traditional employment models, jeopardizing job security for those on more conventional contracts.

Time.news Editor: In your opinion, is the apprehension from ‍the temporary ⁤work sector ⁤justified?

Dr. Grenier: There is certainly merit‍ to their concerns. The CDI-FE does offer ‍attractive conditions for employers, but it’s crucial to assess whether this will lead to a decline in​ traditional ⁢job opportunities. Both models have their place in the labor market, and finding a ‌balance⁢ is essential. Moreover, the CDI-FE’s low ⁣uptake — only‌ 5,000 contracts signed since its⁢ inception — raises questions about its effectiveness and‌ market adoption.

Time.news Editor: Speaking of numbers, what does this limited uptake ⁢say ⁣about the reception of the CDI-FE among ‍potential ⁢beneficiaries?

Dr. Grenier: The low⁤ number ⁣suggests that while there may be a well-intentioned framework in place, it ⁤hasn’t resonated sufficiently with the ​target audience. There could be several reasons for ⁣this — from lack of awareness regarding the contract‌ to possible reservations about its long-term viability. The‌ upcoming adjustment ​in scope could be a necessary step to make it more appealing ‌and to address these shortcomings.

Time.news Editor: Just last week, the bill was supported by Minister Charlotte Parmentier-Lecocq, ⁣who stated,​ “Abandoning⁤ the experiment would have been a waste.” Do you think this renewed commitment will ⁣improve outcomes?

Dr. Grenier: It could! With the extension and proposed adjustments, there is ⁢a chance for reevaluation and improvement of ‌the CDI-FE’s structure. However, commitment alone isn’t enough; effective implementation and ⁣outreach to potential beneficiaries are vital. Continuous ⁢evaluation and adjustment based on feedback will ⁢be crucial to‌ truly making a difference.

Time.news Editor: If you were to suggest one change ⁢to improve the CDI-FE, what would⁤ it⁤ be?

Dr. Grenier: I would advocate for robust marketing and outreach efforts aimed at both⁤ employers and potential employees. Ensuring that all stakeholders⁣ understand the benefits of ‌the CDI-FE and ‌how⁢ to navigate its processes will be key. ⁤Furthermore, integrating holistic support systems — such as training and mentoring — could enhance⁢ the contract’s appeal ⁤and effectiveness.

Time.news Editor: ⁤ Thank you, Dr. ​Grenier, for⁢ your insights on this important topic. It ⁢seems like there’s much at stake with the future of⁣ the CDI-FE and its potential impact on the​ job market.

Dr. Grenier: Thank you for having me! It’s critical ⁣we keep discussing and ⁢refining these approaches to employment to ​build a more‍ inclusive job ⁤market.

Time.news Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in to this thoughtful discussion⁤ on the CDI-FE. Stay with us for more updates on employment policies and their real-world implications. Until next time!

You may also like

Leave a Comment