Presence of fugitive Murad Saeed revealed in PTI protest

by times news cr

(Owais Kayani) The ⁢presence of fugitive ‌advertiser Murad Saeed in the PTI‌ protest has been revealed.The Ministry of Interior says that Murad Saeed was hiding in a container at Bushra Bibi along with 1500 highly trained miscreants.

The Ministry of Interior⁤ has‍ said that on November ‌21, the Islamabad High⁤ Court directed the federal government to maintain law ‍and order at ​all costs, the obstacles‌ were made by‍ removing machinery and made a way for miscreants. Directed.

However,the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government’s resources were​ fully used in the violent protest,trained terrorists ⁢and Afghan citizens were also⁤ involved in the PTI’s violent​ protest,3 rangers on duty in Islamabad were ⁣killed by a car,Pakistan Army⁣ was deployed in islamabad under Article 245 ⁤of

The‍ PTI’s violent protests included trained miscreants and illegal⁤ Afghan nationals.​ These hardline 1,500 miscreants‌ were working directly under fugitive Admiral Murad Saeed, who⁢ was also accompanying him.

The group used militant tactics to attack the law enforcement ‌officials. With the help of provincial government machinery, the roadblocks were removed to make ⁣way for other miscreants.

The Ministry of Home Affairs ‍said that the PTI has started a systematic‌ propaganda on social media, in which ther is‍ a sinister​ attempt to blame the law ⁢enforcement agencies for the alleged deaths. It ​also denied reports‌ of casualties, using old and fake⁣ AI-generated clips during the fake social media campaign.

It was said in the statement that sadly, some elements of the foreign‍ media have also ⁢fallen victim to this propaganda. PTI’s social media campaign is promoting chaos and divisiveness in ​Pakistan,⁢ such elements inside and abroad will be held accountable under ⁢relevant laws. Used for motivational statements.

The Interior Ministry said that on November 21,⁤ the Islamabad High Court directed the federal government to maintain⁢ law and order ⁢at all costs. The‌ High Court directed the ⁤Interior ⁢Minister⁤ to contact the PTI ⁤leadership regarding ‌law and ⁤order. do

In view of the visit of the ⁤President of Belarus and a high-level Chinese delegation,the PTI was repeatedly asked to⁢ postpone the‌ protest. Despite this, PTI‌ violated the court orders.

The ‍Ministry of Interior⁤ said‍ that ‌the protesters​ violated ‌the law by⁢ entering the red zone of Islamabad instead of⁤ Sangjani. Slingshots, sting grenades, tear gas shells and nail studded sticks etc.were used, but the resources of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government were fully utilized ‌in‌ the violent‍ protest.

in the statement,it was said that⁢ the officials⁢ of the law enforcement⁤ agencies showed extreme patience with the violent protesters,three Rangers officers on duty at the check post in‌ Islamabad were killed by‌ a car,but the violent protesters killed a ‌policeman. An official was also⁤ martyred, 232 law enforcement officials were also injured by miscreants, violent protesters attacked security forces and set⁤ fire to several police vehicles.

the Ministry of‌ interior said that the Pakistan Army ‍was ​deployed in islamabad under Article 245 of the Constitution. To be sure,the police and Rangers did not use ​live ammunition ⁤to disperse the‌ violent mob,the Pakistan Army did not directly clash with​ the ⁣violent mob,nor was it deployed for riot control.

the statement said that ‍during the process of dispersal,the ‍armed guards along with the leadership and the armed ⁢miscreants of the protestors ‌fired⁤ indiscriminately,in these self-inflicted violence,the PTI leadership fled instead of handling the situation. Immediately after the escape of the protestors from the area, the Federal ⁣Interior and Data Ministers also visited the affected area and held ⁤a press talk. Ministers, government officials, police officials and commissioner Islamabad have repeatedly explained the⁣ real situation with corroborating ⁣evidence, law enforcement officials have risked their lives to ⁣protect Pakistani citizens.

The ​statement said that 39 deadly weapons, including 18 automatic ⁢weapons, ⁤were recovered from the⁤ violent protesters, more‌ then three dozen foreign mercenaries were among the arrested militants, 11 vehicles⁣ of law enforcement agencies were set on fire,​ and⁢ prison ⁤vans were set on fire. Also damaged, initial estimates put the damage in the hundreds of millions during the violent protests.

The Ministry of Interior said that ​the indirect losses to the economy due to violent protests are estimated at 192 billion rupees per day. The proud⁢ peopel of Pakistan, including Khyber ​Pakhtunkhwa, ⁣reject this​ kind of ⁤violent ⁤politics. We also reject the ⁣based propaganda, the entire Pakistani nation stands united with the desire for​ peace and stability in the country.

How⁤ can ​the government effectively address the underlying issues leading to‍ political protests?

Interview Between Time.news ⁢Editor and Security Expert ⁣Dr. Zara Ahmed

Time.news Editor ‍(TNE): Good afternoon, Dr. Ahmed. ​Thank you for joining us to discuss ‌a highly pressing issue in pakistan’s political landscape, especially concerning the‍ recent protests led by the Pakistan ‍Tehreek-e-insaf (PTI) and ⁢the alarming assertions made by the Ministry of Interior.

Dr. Zara Ahmed (DZA): Thank you for ​having me. It’s crucial to‌ address what’s happening and its implications for law and order⁣ in the country.

TNE: The Ministry of⁣ Interior has claimed ‍that ‌fugitive⁤ advertiser Murad Saeed was hiding in a container with around 1500 highly trained miscreants. How serious is this claim, and⁤ what does it reveal about the institution behind these⁤ protests?

DZA: ‍ This claim is certainly serious and highlights ‌deep-seated issues regarding governance and the state’s control over law and order. If such organized groups, allegedly containing trained militants and Afghan nationals, are⁤ indeed being directed by individuals like Murad Saeed, it suggests that there’s a level of sophistication in​ their operations that is concerning for ⁢national security.

TNE: The Ministry also ⁢noted that the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government was ⁣instrumental⁢ in facilitating these protests. What does⁣ that imply⁣ about political affiliations and the use of provincial resources during times⁤ of unrest?

DZA: ⁣ The implication ‌is quite significant. If ⁤the provincial government ​is using‌ its resources to aid‍ protests that turn violent, it raises questions about‍ the integrity of governance and accountability. It suggests⁢ potential collusion or at least an alarming disregard for law enforcement efforts.Provincial governments should uphold public safety, not act ‌as accessories to unrest.

TNE: You ‌mentioned the involvement of ⁢trained terrorists and‌ the⁤ use of militant ‌tactics against law enforcement. What kind of threat does this pose for ⁤Pakistan’s security forces and civilians?

DZA: The presence of​ trained terrorists poses a dual threat. First, the immediate ​danger to law enforcement, as evidenced by the tragic⁣ incident in which three ‌rangers lost their lives. Second, it sends a chilling ‍message to civilians‍ about the potential for violence and instability. Continuous unrest ⁤could lead to a breakdown of​ trust in security ​forces and the government⁣ as a ‍whole.

TNE: The Ministry mentioned systematic propaganda by the PTI on social media. In a tech-driven age, how​ impactful is such​ propaganda on public opinion and mobilization during protests?

DZA: Social⁣ media plays a⁢ substantial‌ role in shaping narratives and mobilizing support. Propaganda can be a powerful tool in painting a favorable picture of any political ‍agenda. This allows‍ groups to fan the flames of ​dissent and ⁣pull in‌ various demographics, often leading to a radicalization of views and, ultimately, actions. The impact is profound,⁣ especially when conventional news outlets ⁤are challenged by rapidly changing narratives online.

TNE: With the military deployed under Article ⁣245,the situation appears tense. Do you think this is an appropriate response ‍to maintain order,and what ramifications might this have on‍ civilian-military relations?

DZA: Deploying the military is a serious step and should ⁣be reserved for when all other options have been exhausted. While it might restore short-term order,it​ also has‍ the potential to strain civilian-military relations significantly. If citizens begin to ​view the military as an occupying force rather than protectors, it could lead to long-term consequences for democracy and governance.

TNE: ⁤Lastly, Dr. Ahmed, what⁢ measures should the government take to prevent the situation from escalating further?

DZA: First, transparent communication is essential to build trust with the ⁤public. Second, a thorough‌ investigation into the claims should be conducted to hold accountable any individuals involved in perpetrating violence. ⁤Third, addressing underlying grievances that lead individuals to participate in such protests is vital, focusing on socio-economic development. promoting dialog rather than confrontation can help alleviate tensions.

TNE: Thank you, Dr. Ahmad, for your insightful analysis. The current ‌political climate in Pakistan is undoubtedly complex, and your expertise helps ‌shed light on the implications of recent events.

DZA: Thank you for having me. It’s important we continue to engage in these discussions to promote understanding and ⁢solutions in⁣ these challenging times.

You may also like

Leave a Comment