Russian lawmakers took aim at the incomes of individuals declared foreign agents

by times news cr

Russian MPs took aim at the ⁣income ⁤of the persons declared to be foreign agents, reported France Press.

In the lower house of the Russian parliament, a law was ⁢voted ⁢on the first reading, which prohibits persons declared as‍ foreign⁣ agents from spending in Russia their income from cultural or intellectual activities.

In Russia, those ​natural and legal⁢ persons who ⁣are declared ​foreign agents​ and who ​are largely critics ‍of‍ the government are already subject to severe administrative restrictions. If they⁢ do not obey them, they can be⁣ fined and even sent to prison.

According to the new legislative text, which⁤ must be approved in second and ⁤third reading in the lower house of parliament⁢ before being voted on in ⁣the upper house, persons declared as foreign agents will ⁣now have the obligation ​to open a⁢ special bank account‌ in ‌which ​they will be transferred in particular their‌ remuneration for intellectual activities.

The measure will be applied in particular to​ dozens⁤ of artists and writers who were declared foreign agents and most of whom live outside Russia.

“Foreign agents will not be able to enrich themselves to the detriment of the country and its citizens,”‍ said ⁣Vyacheslav Volodin,⁢ Speaker of the State Duma (lower ​house of parliament).

“These ‌measures⁤ that have been​ taken are aimed at stopping ‌the enrichment of traitors,” he⁤ added.

There are 493 people on the ⁢list of foreign agents, including the writers Lyudmila Ulitska and Boris Akunin, as well ⁣as journalists and leading opposition figures, ⁣BTA writes.

The Foreign Agents⁤ Act was ⁢passed in 2012. and was‍ gradually tightened and its scope⁣ expanded, particularly after the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

What are⁢ the potential consequences for individuals labeled⁤ as foreign agents under⁢ Russia’s new law?

Interview:⁢ An Insight into Russia’s Foreign Agent Law

Time.news Editor⁣ (TNE): ‍Welcome to Time.news! ⁢Today, we have the ⁣pleasure⁤ of speaking with Dr. Julia Petrovna, a political analyst⁢ and expert ‍on Russian legislation and civil liberties. We’re diving into ⁢a recent ‌law passed ⁤in the Russian parliament regarding ‌individuals classified as ‘foreign‍ agents.’ Dr. Petrovna, thank you for joining⁢ us.

Dr. Julia ⁣Petrovna (JP): Thank you for having me!⁣ I’m excited to discuss such an important issue.

TNE: Let’s start⁤ with the basics. Can you explain what this new⁣ law entails and its implications for those labeled as‌ foreign agents in Russia?

JP: ⁢ Absolutely. This ⁤new legislation prohibits individuals classified as foreign agents from using‍ income derived from cultural or⁤ intellectual activities ‌within Russia. Essentially, the government⁢ is targeting critics of the regime, who often⁣ rely on these avenues for work and ‌expression, thereby stifling dissent and limiting their financial sustainability.

TNE: ⁤It sounds quite draconian. Who exactly falls​ under this category of ‘foreign agents’?

JP: The designation is primarily aimed at⁢ individuals and entities that ⁢are perceived to be receiving ‌foreign funding or that the government ​accuses of engaging in political activities against the ⁣Russian state. This⁢ label has been widely applied‌ to​ journalists, activists, ⁣and various ​NGOs that challenge the current administration.

TNE: There must be significant consequences for those affected. Can you elaborate on how this impacts the cultural and ​intellectual landscape in​ Russia?

JP: ‌ Most definitely. This law sends a chilling message to anyone involved in cultural production, intellectual discourse, ⁢or the arts. Many creators may choose to self-censor their work or‌ withdraw from public life⁢ altogether for fear of repercussions. It ⁢diminishes the space‌ for diverse ⁣voices, ⁤leading‌ to ​a more homogenized cultural narrative that aligns with government propaganda.

TNE: Indeed, that sounds like a concerning trajectory. Given the increasing ​authoritarian measures,⁤ how do ‌you foresee the global community reacting to these developments?

JP: The international community has been‍ critical of Russia’s ​moves to restrict freedoms. However, responses have⁣ often been limited to sanctions and verbal condemnation. To create real change, there ‌needs⁤ to be a concerted effort to support⁤ those labeled as foreign agents, such as ​providing financial aid, ‍asylum options, and highlighting their work ‍on global platforms.

TNE: ⁣ What can local activists and⁢ the communities affected do in response to this legislation?

JP: Solidarity is crucial. Building networks of support among those labeled as foreign agents and the broader civil society can bolster resilience. Engaging with ‍international allies and⁢ attracting media attention to their plight⁣ can also help. They must‌ continue to advocate for freedom of expression and seek‍ legal challenges to unjust laws like this.

TNE: As ⁢this situation unfolds, what ‌does the future look like for freedom of speech and civil rights in Russia?

JP: The outlook remains bleak without significant shifts in domestic political dynamics or ⁣pressure‍ from ⁤the‍ international community. However, history indicates that oppressive⁤ regimes often face resistance. While ⁣the current trajectory is troubling, ​there is always hope for change driven by ⁤the ⁣courage​ of ‍individuals ‌and communities who refuse to remain silent.

TNE: Thank you, Dr. Petrovna, for sharing such valuable insights on‍ this important issue. We appreciate your expertise.

JP: Thank‍ you⁤ for having me. It’s important that we keep these discussions ​alive.

TNE: And thank‌ you,⁢ readers, ‌for joining us. Stay tuned for more updates on critical global issues.

You may also like

Leave a Comment