Ryanair boss rails against German politicians: “Bullshit solutions”

by times news cr

Criticism of taxes ‌

Ryanair boss insults German politicians


11/29/2024 – 1:36 ⁢a.mReading time: 3 min.

Ryanair boss‍ O’Leary⁤ settles accounts with German politicians: “There’s no solution⁢ for anything.” (archive image) (Quelle: Cecilia Fabiano/LaPresse via ZUMA Press/dpa/dpa-bilder)

Ryanair Michael O’Leary speaks of bullshit ​politics‌ and rails⁤ against German taxes on flights. Due to low returns, he announced cuts to the ⁢flight schedule.

The head of the low-cost‌ airline ryanair, Michael O’Leary, has massively criticized German ⁤politicians.The airline boss, who is known for ‍his pithy sayings, attacked the outgoing federal government harshly in an‍ interview. He called it a “government of idiots.” ‍In an interview with German journalists, he accused the Greens of ‍”only bullshit solutions,” as the‌ “Berliner Zeitung” reports. He has no ​hope of enhancement: “I don’t think⁤ the next ⁣federal government will be better,” he is quoted as saying. Germany is “fucked” for the next few years, which is probably the best way to translate the “fucked” he uses.

O’Leary had asked for an interview ⁣at the Irish company headquarters in Dublin and initially praised German beer‍ and the successes of the ⁤German footballers against england. When it ‍came to aviation,however,the tone quickly became harsher. Germany has​ one​ of ⁣the “shittiest aviation markets in Europe,” complained the 63-year-old,according to the “Berliner Zeitung”. He also used fecal language in ⁤his assessment of German air traffic control ‌and taxes ‍on ​flights.

The head of the ⁤low-cost airline sees what he sees ‌as‌ high taxes⁢ and fees as a reason why the market for flights in Germany has not recovered after Corona.‌ He calculated that the‌ taxes would be 58⁤ euros⁣ per ‍passenger. ⁣Germans fly less than Italians, such as, and German airports have fewer‌ passengers ‌than others in Europe.‌ “As an‍ access ‍point to the⁢ capital of Europe’s largest economy, BER is dysfunctional,” said ‍Ryanair co-CEO eddie Wilson, according to the newspaper. ‍His ⁣colleague O’Leary calls it a regional airport.

He is not completely ⁤alone⁤ in this.according to the new Institute for Air Transport in Hamburg, Germany is​ making slower progress than othre countries in recovering air traffic after the corona⁣ pandemic.⁢ “Global air ⁢traffic⁤ is gradually recovering to pre-Corona levels, but ‌Germany is lagging⁤ behind, especially when​ it comes to decentralized‍ connections,” said the‍ institute’s acting director, florian Linke.

The delay ‌is probably the result of high ​location ⁢costs ⁤and low⁢ economic growth.“This reduces the attractiveness for low-cost airlines and poses challenges for the advancement of regional airports,”​ said Linke.

According to the boss, Ryanair intends to use 300 new aircraft‌ in the coming‍ years, but probably hardly in Germany. The returns are too low⁣ for that. He doesn’t want ‌to‍ leave the ⁣market completely. But the company has already announced at the end of March that it ⁢will withdraw from Dortmund, Dresden and Halle/Leipzig airports‌ and plans to reduce capacity at other locations. And O’Leary ‍also announced for the 2025 summer flight ​schedule:​ “We will continue⁣ to make cuts.”

But⁣ Germany​ is⁢ not the only country on O’Leary’s⁤ list. Ryanair has threatened ⁢to stop⁢ flying to⁤ ten French airports from next year amid plans to considerably‍ increase ⁣taxes on airline ⁢tickets in France. Ryanair expects to “cut capacity to and​ from⁤ french regional‌ airports by up to 50‌ percent from⁢ January 2025 if the French government pursues its short-sighted plan to ‍triple ‌the passenger tax,” Ryanair ‌commercial director Jason McGuinness said ⁤on Wednesday.

And there is also bad news from the Italian ​market,which was praised by the airline⁢ boss. ⁢There, the airline has to reimburse thousands of passengers for the additional fees they charged for checking​ in at⁤ the airport. The Italian competition authority AGCM announced on Thursday that Ryanair had‍ “not adequately” informed its customers about this additional fee. ‌The​ airline ⁢charged 55 euros if passengers had not checked in online within a deadline set by⁣ Ryanair and had to ‌do so at the airport.

What are the potential economic impacts of high flight ‍taxes on low-cost airlines like Ryanair?

Interview Between Time.news Editor and Aviation Expert

Editor: ‌ Welcome to Time.news, ⁣where we dive deep into the⁣ most⁤ pressing issues affecting the world today. ⁢Our‌ topic of discussion centers⁤ around Ryanair’s CEO,⁣ Michael O’Leary, who has recently ⁤launched a scathing critique of German ​politics, especially regarding taxation on​ flights. Joining us today ‍is ‍Dr.Hans Müller, an ‍expert in aviation economics. Dr. Müller, thanks for being hear!

Dr. Müller: Thank⁤ you for having ⁣me. ‌It’s⁢ an interesting topic, indeed.

Editor: O’leary didn’t hold back,referring to the German government as a “government of ⁤idiots” and claiming‌ that there are‍ no effective solutions for the​ airline industry from‌ the current governance. How critically importent‍ is this type of public outburst from ​a high-profile CEO ⁢like him?

Dr. Müller: It’s quite significant, ‍actually. O’Leary’s ⁤statements reflect not only his frustration but also highlight a⁣ broader tension between low-cost airlines and regulatory bodies. His choice of words, while inflammatory, brings ​attention to⁢ the‌ challenges⁣ that⁣ low-cost carriers face, especially in a⁢ market ‍with ‍high taxes​ and stringent regulations.It can be seen as a call ⁢to action for⁢ policymakers to reevaluate their approach.

Editor: He particularly criticized the Green Party, claiming they only propose “bullshit solutions.” Given that environmental policies often ⁢come with increased costs for airlines, how can we ⁣balance environmental concerns with the lasting operation of low-cost airlines?

Dr. Müller: That’s a delicate balancing ⁢act. While it’s imperative to address climate⁤ change,​ we ‌also need to consider the⁤ economic implications of thes policies. O’Leary’s remarks underscore the⁢ anxiety among airline CEOs regarding the costs imposed by environmental regulations, which can make ‌flying more expensive and​ less‍ accessible for consumers. It’s about finding innovation and incentives for ⁢greener practices that ‍do not cripple the business model of low-cost carriers.

Editor: ​O’Leary has ​also stated that ⁤he has no hope that the next federal government will improve the situation. ⁢Given ​Germany’s political landscape⁣ and the challenges posed‌ by fluctuating market‌ conditions, how do‍ you ​foresee the future for Ryanair and other low-cost airlines in Europe?

Dr. Müller: ‍ The outlook is mixed.On one hand, there is growing competition and demand for air​ travel, particularly in ​the post-pandemic recovery phase. On the other hand,regulatory burdens and tax ‌policies in countries‌ like Germany could ⁣stifle growth. ⁣If the‌ next government does not​ take a pragmatic‍ approach that recognizes the needs‍ of the aviation ⁤sector while also addressing⁣ environmental‍ issues, we could see reduced ​flight schedules and higher fares.

editor: O’Leary has mentioned potential cuts to Ryanair’s flight ‌schedule due to these low ‍returns.What impact would this ​have ⁣on ‍the broader travel market?

Dr.Müller: Cuts‍ to flight schedules would ⁣likely lead to increased prices and less competition in certain⁣ routes. This could push consumers toward other travel ‍options, such as trains or cars, especially in countries⁢ with efficient rail networks. In⁣ the long run,it ⁤might also benefit competitors who can capitalize on Ryanair’s reduced presence in the market.

Editor: Lastly, O’Leary’s criticisms seem to resonate ‍with a sentiment of frustration within the industry. ‌Do you think this kind ⁣of⁣ public pushback can lead to tangible changes in policy?

Dr. Müller: Public outcry can certainly‌ influence policymakers, especially when it comes ​from⁤ someone as ‍prominent as O’Leary. However,⁤ real ‍change often requires⁤ sustained advocacy⁢ from ‍multiple stakeholders, including airlines, consumers, ‍and environmental groups. If his comments ⁣ignite a broader discussion about the health of ⁤the aviation industry and taxation policies, we could see some movement in‍ the right direction — but it⁢ needs to be more than just rhetoric.

Editor: Thank ‌you, Dr. Müller, ​for your insights on ​this volatile topic. ​O’Leary’s frustrations are‍ certainly a reflection of ⁣the complex interplay between the‌ aviation industry, ⁢government policy, and‍ environmental responsibilities. We‍ appreciate your‍ expertise!

Dr. Müller: ⁢Thank you for the chance to discuss these ​critically important issues.

You may also like

Leave a Comment