In 2025, the scientific community is increasingly stepping beyond conventional boundaries, as researchers confront urgent ecological, climate, and social crises.Many scientists, including climatologists, epidemiologists, and ecologists, are abandoning their labs to advocate for the protection of living beings, raising questions about the relevance of scientific neutrality in today’s world. This shift is highlighted by the works of philosopher Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent and epidemiologist Kevin Jean, who explore the role of scientists as activists in the face of widespread inaction. as civil disobedience and nonviolent protests gain traction among researchers, the call for a more engaged scientific approach becomes ever more pressing.
Title: The Role of Scientists as Activists in Addressing Climate Change: A Discussion with Expert Kevin Jean
Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome, Kevin Jean, renowned epidemiologist and advocate for scientific engagement. In your recent discussions, you highlight a importent shift in the scientific community, where many researchers are stepping beyond their conventional roles. What catalyzed this movement?
Kevin Jean (KJ): Thank you for having me. The urgency of current ecological, climate, and social crises has made it clear that customary scientific neutrality is often inadequate. We can no longer observe and analyse from a distance; we must take action. the climate crisis is an excellent example—it’s demanding that scientists advocate for policy changes and social justice actively.
TNE: This shift suggests a departure from the historical notion of scientific neutrality. How do you view the relevance of scientific objectivity in light of this change?
KJ: Scientific objectivity remains crucial, but it doesn’t mean scientists should remain silent about the dangers we face.As philosophers like Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent argue, scientific neutrality can sometimes perpetuate inaction. By embracing activism,scientists can harness their expertise to influence public discourse and policy in meaningful ways without sacrificing rigorous scientific standards.
TNE: Captivating. What implications dose this have for the relationship between scientists and the public?
KJ: By emerging as advocates, scientists can bridge the gap between complex scientific concepts and public understanding. This yields a more engaged populace, fostering informed decision-making regarding climate action. As we see with prominent scientists like Katharine hayhoe and Michael Mann, effective interaction is vital in building public trust and involvement around critical issues like climate change[1[1[1[1].
TNE: You mentioned that civil disobedience and nonviolent protests are becoming more common in the scientific community. Can you discuss the ethical considerations involved here?
KJ: Absolutely. While civil disobedience is a tool for urgent change, scientists must consider the potential consequences of their actions.It should be rooted in a genuine commitment to protect living beings and promote planetary health. This strategy isn’t taken lightly; it arises from a sense of moral obligation to confront existential threats, as we are witnessing increasingly severe impacts from climate inaction.
TNE: In your opinion, what steps should scientists take if they want to transition from traditional roles into more activist positions?
KJ: First, they need to educate themselves about effective advocacy and communication strategies. Joining networks that support scientific activism is crucial, like those fostering diversity in science, such as Black in Neuro. Building connections with grassroots movements can amplify their efforts. It’s equally important for scientists to share their stories and findings with the public—this transparency bolsters credibility and drives engagement[2[2[2[2].
TNE: for our readers, what practical advice can you offer for those looking to make a difference through science?
KJ: Start small by engaging with your local community—host workshops or discussions to raise awareness about ecological issues. Collaborate with local organizations to promote science-based solutions to environmental problems. Ultimately, be relentless in your quest for knowledge, and don’t shy away from using your expertise to advocate for policies that prioritize the health of our planet and its inhabitants.
TNE: Thank you, Kevin, for sharing your insights. The necessity for scientists to engage as activists is indeed more pressing than ever.
KJ: It’s my pleasure. We are at a pivotal moment where the intersection of science and activism can yield transformative change in our society.