South Korea’s president announces the lifting of martial law a few hours after it was announced – rts.ch

by time news

South Korean president Yoon ⁤Suk Yeol announced the lifting of martial ⁤law on⁤ Tuesday, ⁣hours after⁤ it was announced. He made this decision‍ by describing the opposition, the majority ‌in Parliament, as “forces ⁢unfriendly to the State”, ⁢and​ by recalling threats coming from ⁢North Korea.

First the leader created a surprise‌ during a⁣ live televised⁣ speech. “to⁤ protect liberal South Korea from the threats from the communist forces of North Korea and eliminate elements hostile to the State (…) I​ declare emergency martial‍ law,” he ⁤announced.

The head of state, however,⁤ did not mention a ⁢specific threat from nuclear-armed North Korea, focusing instead ‌on its domestic political enemies. “Without⁢ concern⁢ for the livelihood of the people,the opposition party‌ has paralyzed the government,for the purposes of impeachments,special investigations and to ‍protect its leader from legal‌ prosecution,” said the ⁣president.

Yoon suk Yeol retreated a ⁤few hours later. He​ announced that he would lift martial law and withdraw ‌the troops deployed in Seoul, and that the head of state would have to comply with a vote in the opposition-led Parliament.

“A request from the National Assembly succeeded in raising the state of emergency and‌ we continued to withdraw the ‍soldiers who were‌ deployed for martial law operations,” the president announced, again on television.

>> Details⁤ from⁤ Michael Peuker in the Forum:

‌ South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol declares martial law, ⁢opposition calls⁣ for‍ protests (video) / Forum / 2 min. ‌/ yesterday at ⁤6:00 p.m.

parliament sealed

There was a shock wave in the country ⁣due to the declaration of martial law, which has not experienced this ⁢measure since 1980 and whose regime is⁢ considered⁢ democratic.

At the President’s announcement, the South Korean Parliament ⁤was sealed off and ‌helicopters landed on its roof in Seoul. At the ​opposition’s call, hundreds of people came to Parliament to protest.

South Korea’s president announces the lifting of martial law a few hours after it was announced – rts.ch Helicopters​ around the National Assembly of South Korea after martial law was announced‍ on Tuesday. [via REUTERS – YONHAP]

Martial law allows military authorities to assume certain⁢ civilian‌ functions to maintain public order and ensure national security.It could, such as, establish a curfew or deploy armed​ forces.

The‌ army also ​announced ⁢some of the measures, including the‌ ban on the activities of the Parliament and political parties, and ‍the media and publishers that come under the control of the ⁢command ⁤responsible⁣ for the ​implementation of martial law.

Internal competitions

These events come as yoon Suk Yeol’s People Power Party continues to battle with the opposition main Democratic Party ⁤over ‍next year’s proposed budget. Opposition MPs⁤ approved a significantly ⁢reduced budget program last week through committee.

“Our National Assembly has ⁤become a haven for criminals,​ a den of legislative dictatorship that seeks to​ paralyze the administrative ⁢and judicial systems and subvert our liberal democratic order,” declared⁣ Yoon Suk Yeol​ justified. the ‍martial law.

He also ​accused the elected‍ representatives ⁢of the opposition of “cutting all the budgets necessary for the​ main ​functions of the nation, namely the fight against drug-related ⁤crimes and the maintenance⁣ of public security (…) to transform ⁣the country a drug haven. ⁣and a place of⁤ chaos with public ‌safety.”

Yoon Suk Yeol described the opposition,which has a majority ⁣in Parliament,as “functions hostile to the state that⁢ intend to‍ overthrow the regime”,declaring that‌ his decision was “inevitable”. “I will bring back normalcy to the country by​ getting rid of⁤ these forces hostile to ⁤the state ‍quickly,” the South Korean president said.

“Tanks,armored personnel carriers ‌and soldiers armed with guns ​and knives will rule the‍ country,”​ criticized Lee Jae-myung,leader of the⁣ Democratic Party,during‍ a speech broadcast online. “The​ economy‌ of⁣ the Republic of Korea will irreversibly decline,” he‍ said.

⁢ >> Details from Chloé Borgnon in​ South Korea:

Martial law declared in South‌ Korea: explanations from⁢ journalist Chloe Borgognon, France 24 correspondent in South Korea

​Martial law was⁣ declared in ⁣South‌ Korea: explanations ⁣from the journalist Chloé Borgnon, correspondent of ‍France 24 in ‍South ⁤Korea / 7:30 pm​ / 1 min. / yesterday‍ at 7:30 pm ​

juma/boi/hkr⁢ with‍ agencies

How has public reaction influenced President Yoon ‌Suk ⁢Yeol’s‍ decision to⁢ reverse martial law?

Time.news Interview: The Lifting of⁣ Martial Law⁣ in South Korea

Interviewer‍ (Time.news Editor): Welcome, everyone, to⁢ this special segment‍ where we delve into the recent political turbulence in South ⁤Korea. Joining me today⁤ is Dr. Jinho Park, a political analyst⁣ specializing in East Asian affairs. Thank you ⁣for being here,Dr. Park.

Dr. Jinho ⁢park: ‌Thank you for having me.It’s a pleasure to discuss such an meaningful topic.

Interviewer: Let’s get straight to it. President Yoon Suk Yeol’s declaration of martial ⁣law sent shockwaves throughout South Korea. How unprecedented ⁤is this move in the context of South Korean⁢ democracy?

Dr. Park: ⁤It truly is unprecedented, especially given that martial law has not been declared since 1980. South Korea has a strong ⁤democratic foundation now, so any ⁢action ‌reminiscent of past authoritarian ⁤measures raises alarms about ⁢the state of civil liberties and governance.

Interviewer: President Yoon described opposition parties as “forces unfriendly to the State.” What does this⁢ rhetoric⁢ indicate about the current political climate?

Dr.Park: That rhetoric is​ indicative​ of‌ a deepening polarization in South Korean politics. By framing ⁢the opposition in such stark⁣ terms, the president‌ not only seeks to rally his base but also delegitimize his opponents. It reflects a⁢ shift towards more contentious politics, where dissent is ⁢viewed as a threat‌ rather ‌than a ‌vital part of democracy.

Interviewer: ⁣ You mentioned the historical context; is​ there a parallel between this situation and previous ⁣political crises‌ in South⁤ Korea?

dr. Park: Absolutely. History has ⁤shown us that invoking state⁤ security ‌often bears the risk⁢ of undermining democratic institutions. In the past, similar tactics ​have been used to suppress political dissent, leading to widespread public backlash. President yoon might not realize that such moves could led to unintended‍ consequences, ⁣such as protests or a loss of public trust.

Interviewer: Speaking of protests,⁢ South Korea’s opposition has called for public‌ demonstrations against this martial law. What could that mean ⁣for the future of Yoon’s governance?

Dr.⁤ Park: Should the⁢ protests gain momentum, it could significantly challenge Yoon’s⁣ administration. ‌Public sentiment is crucial in South Korean politics,and large-scale ​protests can lead to political shifts.The ⁢recent lifting of martial law ‌suggests ⁣a​ recognition of the potential backlash. However, ⁢if the protests are sustained, ⁣they might force the government to reconsider​ its approach or lead to political instability.

Interviewer: In a matter of just hours, martial ​law was lifted and troops withdrawn.‌ What‍ does this rapid reversal say‍ about ⁢the administration’s internal dynamics?

Dr. Park: The speed of this reversal indicates that there​ was perhaps significant pushback, both from within the government and from‌ the​ public. It suggests that the administration may not have anticipated the⁢ level of discontent and could imply ⁣that Yoon’s leadership is more precarious than ⁣it appears. Listening to the National Assembly and quickly complying with its request​ demonstrates ⁤a degree of vulnerability.

Interviewer: looking forward, what measures⁣ do you think the South Korean government should take to restore public ​trust?

Dr. Park: Openness ⁢and dialog with the opposition ‍and the public will be crucial. They must prioritize democratic principles, engage in thoughtful ‍discussions ​regarding national security in a⁢ way that does not undermine civic ‌freedoms, and perhaps even reassess their approach to governance. Building consensus is necessary to‌ prevent further political crises.

Interviewer: ‌ Thank you,Dr.Park, for your invaluable insights on‌ this evolving situation in ‍South Korea. It will be interesting to see how ⁣this political landscape continues to​ unfold.

Dr. Park: ‌Thank you for having me. It’s vital to keep the⁣ conversations going about democracy and ‌governance in South Korea.

Interviewer: And that wraps up our discussion for today. Stay tuned ⁣for⁢ more updates on‍ this story⁤ and other ⁣global issues. thank you for watching Time.news.

You may also like

Leave a Comment