Strong criticism of revision of the DPR regulations regarding the Standing Orders, equivalent: it’s a form of wrong intervention!

by times news cr

Chairman of the National Council Equivalent to Institute Hendardi. Photo: Ricardo/jpnn.com

jpnn.com – Chairman of the National Council Setara Institute Hendardi strongly criticized the revision of the House of Representatives Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning the rules after the provisions of the supervisory function.

“The form of wrong intervention in the principle of check and balances in the Indonesian constitutional system,” Hendardi said through the message service, Thursday (6/2).

Later, Article 228a paragraph 2 in the revision of DPR Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning Tatib reaped the spotlight of various parties.

Because, the article in the regulation allows the legislature to evaluate a number of state officials whose appointment through the political process in the DPR.

Such as, the legislature can evaluate the MK and MA judges, the Fire of the KPK, the Commissioner of State Institutions, as well as the Governor and the Board of Governors of Bank Indonesia.

Hendardi considers the substance of norms Article 228A is wrongly formal, because the internal regulations of state institutions should only regulate the kitchen affairs of the agency.

“Meanwhile, substantively, the above norms are contrary to the principle of people’s sovereignty in Article 1 paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia,” he said.

Hendardi also considers normal Article 228A in the revision of the DPR regulations.

Chairperson of the Setara Institute of the Institute Hendardi said the revision of the DPR Regulation Number 1 of 2020 Problem Tatib as a form of wrong intervention in state administration.

Please read other interesting content from jpnn.com on Google News

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Statcounter code invalid. Insert a fresh copy.