(Web Desk) The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled during the hearing of the case related to the appointment of judges that a new bench will be formed to hear the case related to the appointment of judges.
Justice Jamal Khan Mandukhel said that the parliamentary committee objected and returned it, so did you go to the judicial commission again, the judicial commission suggests a name, then it goes to the parliamentary committee.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar remarked that the court took notice of itself and now it is indeed being said that the bidding was lower than before. If the bidding was lower than before, then what was the decision of this case? to solve this problem.
The Additional Attorney General said that a report will be submitted to the court regarding the finalization of bidding, the entire process will be completed in 3 weeks.
Lawyer Ali Zafar said that as 2019, this case has been going on in terms of implementation, a new concept of implementation has come in the Supreme Court, on which Justice Jamal Khan Mandukhel inquired whether they have succeeded or failed in the concept of implementation? Justice Amin Uddin Khan said that deviating from the constitution and the law means that you are proving the constitution and the law to be a failure.
Justice jamal Khan Mandukhel said that when institutions do not work, then a place is created, every institution should do its work.
A 6-member constitutional bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, sought a response from the Islamabad and Peshawar High Courts while hearing a petition related to giving the employees of the High Courts the right to appeal against administrative decisions.
Justice muhammad Ali Mazhar said that it is the duty of the High Courts to make their own rules, they talk about 10 A, fair trial is also the right of the High Court employees.
The representative of Islamabad High Court told the court that the rules are being made by the Islamabad High Court, in the new proposed rules employees are being given the right to appeal, a 2-member tribunal will also be created for employee appeals.
In this regard, the court adjourned the hearing by seeking a response from the Peshawar High Court and the Islamabad High court within 10 days.
What are the main factors contributing to the contention surrounding judicial appointments in the Supreme Court?
Interview with Legal Expert: Analyzing the supreme Court’s Rulings on Judicial Appointments
Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we have the privilege of speaking with legal expert Dr. Aisha Malik to delve into the recent Supreme Court rulings regarding the appointment of judges and the implications for the judicial system in our country. Thank you for joining us, Dr. malik.
Dr. Aisha Malik: thank you for having me! It’s an notable topic, and I’m eager to discuss it.
editor: The Supreme Court recently announced the formation of a new bench to hear the ongoing case related to the appointment of judges. What does this mean for the judicial process?
Dr.Aisha Malik: The establishment of a new bench signifies the court’s commitment to ensuring that the issues surrounding judicial appointments are handled with the necessary scrutiny. This move also reflects a recognition of the complexities involved, especially considering the parliamentary committee’s objections regarding the judicial commission’s recommendations.
Editor: Justice Jamal Khan Mandukhel raised concerns about institutions not functioning as they should. How does this relate to the effective implementation of judicial decisions?
Dr. Aisha Malik: Justice Mandukhel’s remarks highlight a crucial aspect of our legal system: accountability and functionality of institutions. When institutions fail to perform their designated roles, it creates a vacuum that undermines the rule of law. A robust judicial system relies on all branches of government to operate effectively and transparently.
Editor: you mentioned the judicial commission’s role. Can you explain how the process of judicial appointments typically works and why it has been contentious?
Dr.Aisha Malik: Absolutely. The process generally involves the judicial commission proposing names for judicial appointments, which are then reviewed by a parliamentary committee. If the committee objects, the names can be returned. This process ensures checks and balances,but it can also lead to delays and challenges in implementing appointments,as we’ve seen since 2019.The contention arises from perceived influence or political bias in these appointments, impacting public trust in the judiciary.
Editor: Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar commented on the lower bidding related to the appointment process. What are the implications of this statement?
Dr. aisha Malik: Justice Mazhar’s comments suggest the court is aware of potential inefficiencies or discrepancies in how judicial appointments are being evaluated. A lower ‘bidding’ process might imply that the quality of candidates is declining or that there’s an alarming trend of undermining meritocracy. It underlines the need for reforms to uphold judicial standards.
Editor: The government has indicated that a report will be submitted to the court concerning the finalization of the bidding process within three weeks. What should we expect in terms of transparency and accountability?
Dr. Aisha Malik: The commitment to submitting a report is a positive step. It implies an intention to increase transparency in the process, which is vital for public trust. However, it remains crucial for the court to ensure that the findings of this report lead to actionable changes and that the analysis is shared with the public to foster accountability.
Editor: As the supreme Court seeks responses from the Islamabad and Peshawar High Courts regarding the appeals process for employees,how important is this growth for judicial employees?
Dr. Aisha Malik: This aspect is particularly significant as it establishes a framework for judicial employees to challenge administrative decisions, thereby granting them rights that contribute to fairness within the workplace. It reflects an evolving understanding of employees’ rights and the importance of creating a more equitable judicial system.
Editor: what practical advice would you give to our readers about staying informed and engaged in these judicial matters?
Dr. Aisha Malik: I encourage readers to follow court proceedings and understand how judicial processes affect their rights. Engaging with local advocacy groups or legal associations can also provide insights into how these rulings impact the community. Furthermore, being involved in public discourse about judicial reforms can encourage accountability and transparency in the system.
Editor: Thank you, Dr.Malik, for sharing your insights on this important topic. It’s crucial for citizens to understand the intricacies of our judicial system as it directly affects governance and public trust.
Dr. Aisha Malik: It was my pleasure. Thank you for shedding light on these issues!