The joy in the streets of Damascus for the fall of they pull it is indeed paving the way for uncertainty about the future of an impoverished country war. It remains to be seen what the power structure and share obtained by each of the three major factions that have overthrown the ruling oligarchy for more than half a century will be. THE Islamists They seem to have the upper hand, but the Kurdish rebels They control more than a third of Syrian territory, in strong conflict with the pro-Turkish militias that Erdogan supports. Now the fear of a division into cantons is surpassed only by that of a new civil war.
How can the international community effectively support Syria during its transition to a new political landscape?
Interview with Dr. Amira Khaled: The Future of Syria Post-Oligarchy
Editor, Time.news: Welcome, Dr. Khaled. As we witness the celebrations in the streets of Damascus following the fall of the longstanding oligarchy, the excitement is palpable. What are your thoughts on the immediate aftermath of this political shift?
Dr.Amira Khaled: thank you for having me. The fall of the ruling oligarchy is indeed a historic moment for Syria, but it brings with it a wave of uncertainty. While celebrations are well-deserved, the complexities of power dynamics among various factions must be taken into account. The landscape is now more fragmented than ever.
Editor: Speaking of factions, you mentioned the three major groups that have risen to prominence. Can you elaborate on their roles and the potential implications for Syria’s future?
Dr. Khaled: Certainly. We have the Islamists, who seem to have gained notable ground and public support. Then, there are the Kurdish rebels, who control over a third of Syrian territory, which introduces a vital layer of complexity due to their ongoing conflict with the pro-Turkish militias supported by Erdogan. The potential for a division into cantons—geographically autonomous areas—looms large, and we cannot disregard the possibility of a new civil war erupting from these tensions.
Editor: That does sound concerning. For everyday Syrians, living in impoverished conditions, what should they expect in terms of societal changes or improvements?
Dr. Khaled: While the hopes for change are high, the reality is that the transition will be difficult. Economic recovery won’t happen overnight, especially with the control of resources now split among diffrent factions. Each group will likely prioritize its own interests, and without a unifying governmental framework, the reconstruction of civil society could take a backseat.
Editor: What practical advice would you offer to those looking to navigate these uncertain times?
Dr.Khaled: One key piece of advice is fostering communication among different communities. Building coalitions across sects and ethnic lines can help create a united front that may advocate for peaceful resolutions. It’s also crucial for individuals and families to stay informed about evolving political dynamics. Participating in local initiatives that promote dialog and cooperation can be beneficial.
Editor: In your opinion, what should the international community’s response be to this transition in Syria?
Dr. Khaled: The international community must tread cautiously.Providing humanitarian aid is essential, but it should be done in a way that prioritizes the needs of civilians above all else. Moreover,diplomatic dialogues with all factions involved,including Islamists and Kurdish representatives,will be crucial to foster a comprehensive peace process that addresses everyone’s concerns.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Khaled. Your insights into the power structure and socio-political climate in Syria post-oligarchy are invaluable. as the situation evolves, we hope for a peaceful resolution that respects the rights and aspirations of all Syrians.
Dr. Khaled: Thank you for discussing these critical issues. Let us remain hopeful and committed to a peaceful future for Syria.