Israeli warplanes launched an air strike on a scientific research center in the vicinity of the city of Al-Safira in the countryside of Aleppo Governorate, in Syria, resulting in many casualties among Syrian army soldiers.
According to what was published by the official Syrian news agency SANA, a military source said: “At approximately 45:00 after midnight, the Israeli enemy launched an air attack from the direction of southeastern Aleppo, targeting a number of sites in the Aleppo and Idlib countryside, which led to the injury of a number of soldiers and the occurrence of some material losses.” “.
In addition, Sputnik reported, “Israeli warplanes fired several missiles at a scientific research center in the vicinity of the city of Al-Safira in the southeastern countryside of Aleppo, using Syrian airspace from above the Syrian-Iraqi border.”
According to Sputnik, “Israeli aircraft flew across the Syrian-Jordanian border and reached the airspace of the American Al-Tanf base, at the triangle of the Syrian-Iraqi-Jordanian border, before heading to the airspace of the Syrian desert to carry out the attack.”
The agency noted, “Meanwhile, a squadron of aircraft crossed the Jordanian-Syrian border airspace towards the occupied Golan. It is likely that the squadron is the same squadron of Israeli aircraft that blocked the return route near midnight, to carry out an aggression against the Aleppo countryside from above the American base in the Al-Tanf area at The Syrian-Jordanian-Iraqi border triangle.
Syria constantly warns “against the recurrence of Israeli attacks on its territory, noting that this may lead to an escalation of violence in the region in a way that is difficult to control.”
Last updated: November 9, 2024 - 08:14
Suggest a correction
Time.news Interview: An Insight into the Recent Israeli Airstrikes in Syria
Editor: Welcome to Time.news, where we delve into the most pressing global issues. Today, we’re discussing the recent airstrikes conducted by Israeli warplanes on a scientific research center in Al-Safira, Syria. Joining us is Dr. Eliana Cohen, a Middle East security expert and former intelligence analyst. Thank you for being here, Dr. Cohen.
Dr. Cohen: Thank you for having me.
Editor: Let’s get right into it. The recent airstrike reportedly resulted in numerous casualties among Syrian army soldiers. We understand there were also significant material losses. Can you share what might have prompted Israel’s decision to target a scientific research center?
Dr. Cohen: Certainly. Israel has long viewed military and scientific facilities in neighboring countries, particularly Syria, as potential threats. This specific airstrike could be linked to concerns over the development of weapons that could be used against Israel or its allies. Al-Safira has been known to house research facilities that may contribute to military capabilities.
Editor: According to reports, Israeli warplanes fired missiles from the direction of southeastern Aleppo. What does this mean strategically for both Israel and the Syrian government?
Dr. Cohen: From a strategic perspective, conducting airstrikes from southeastern Aleppo allows Israel to minimize exposure to Syrian air defenses, which have become increasingly sophisticated. For the Syrian government, these strikes can be politically multifaceted. While they highlight vulnerabilities, they also provide a narrative of external aggression that rallies support domestically and from allied countries like Russia or Iran.
Editor: The Syrian news agency SANA reported injuries and material losses but did not specify the number of casualties. Why might there be such a lack of transparency in reporting?
Dr. Cohen: In conflict zones, especially where national pride and military capability are at stake, governments often control information carefully. They may underreport casualties to maintain morale and avoid the perception of weakness. This is especially true in the context of the ongoing Syrian civil war, where public sentiment is crucial for the government.
Editor: There’s a lot of speculation surrounding these developments—some commentators believe that this might escalate tensions further. Do you agree?
Dr. Cohen: Yes, I think there’s a real risk of escalation. With ongoing conflicts and entrenched interests in the region, any military action can trigger a series of retaliatory responses. Israel has also been vocal about its intent to prevent Iran from establishing a foothold in Syria, which adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
Editor: In your opinion, what should the international community’s response be to such actions?
Dr. Cohen: The international community must engage in dialogue rather than exacerbate tensions. It’s essential that there is an understanding of the consequences of military actions and that constructive diplomatic initiatives are pursued. Sanctions, dialogues, and peace negotiations could help mitigate these conflicts and establish a framework for stability in the region.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Cohen, for your insights into this complex situation. We appreciate you shedding light on how these airstrikes may impact both regional security and international relations.
Dr. Cohen: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial that we continue to observe and analyze these developments with a nuanced perspective.
Editor: That wraps up our discussion for today. Stay tuned to Time.news for the latest updates on global events.