nbsp; Tehran–INA Iran strongly condemned the tripartite US-French-British strike on Syria, stressing that it constitutes a violation of international laws. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs explained in a statement, a copy of which was received by the (INA), that “this attack is a blatant violation of international laws and the sovereignty of Syrian territories, warning of its regional and international consequences and effects, and holding America and its allies responsible for the consequences and effects of this adventure.” The Iranian Foreign Ministry pointed out that “at the time In which Tehran refuses to use chemical weapons, it opposes creating pretexts for aggression against an independent country,” noting that “this attack will undermine the chances for peace and security in the world.” “It creates chaos and instability in the region and would strengthen the front of terrorists and extremists.” The Foreign Ministry confirmed in its statement that “the attack came after the defeat of the terrorists in Eastern Ghouta in order to compensate for their losses and continue supporting them, noting that the strike was carried out without any evidence and before the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons announced its opinion and that America and its allies had appointed themselves global judges and policemen.”
How has Iran reacted to the US-French-British military actions in Syria?
Interview: Insights on the US-French-British Strike on Syria with Expert Analyst Dr. Amir Hosseini
Time.news Editor: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Hosseini. Iran has made strong statements concerning the recent tripartite strike on Syria by the US, France, and the UK. Can you elaborate on Iran’s position regarding this military action?
Dr. Amir Hosseini: Thank you for having me. Iran has categorically condemned this strike, labeling it a blatant violation of international laws and Syria’s sovereignty. The Iranian government underscores that such military actions not only breach international norms but also risk destabilizing an already volatile region. They argue that these aggressions serve to create pretexts for further conflict rather than fostering peace.
Time.news Editor: What are the potential regional and international consequences of this strike, as highlighted by the Iranian Foreign Ministry?
Dr. Amir Hosseini: The consequences can be quite severe. Iran’s statement warns that the attack could exacerbate chaos and instability in the Middle East, potentially emboldening terrorist groups and extremists. If unchecked, such military decisions could create a broader conflict that undermines peace efforts not just in Syria but across the region. It signals a troubling trend where major powers act unilaterally without robust evidence or international consensus.
Time.news Editor: The Iranian Foreign Ministry also mentioned the timing of this strike coinciding with a defeat of terrorists in Eastern Ghouta. Can you shed light on this connection?
Dr. Amir Hosseini: Certainly. The implication is that the strike may be an attempt to support terrorist groups that are losing ground in Syria. Iran suggests that the attack serves as a form of compensation for these groups to regain momentum. It is critical to consider that such interventions might mitigate the pressure on these extremist factions and prolong the conflict.
Time.news Editor: One of the key insights in the Iranian statement is their objection to unilateral military actions. What are the broader implications for international relations when countries act as ‘global judges’ and ‘policemen’?
Dr. Amir Hosseini: When countries take it upon themselves to act unilaterally, it challenges established norms of international law and governance. It undermines the role of international organizations, such as the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which are designed to mediate and respond to such conflicts. This disregard for diplomatic processes could lead to a more fragmented international order, where power dynamics shift dangerously, and smaller nations feel increasingly vulnerable.
Time.news Editor: As we consider the situation’s complexity, what practical advice can you offer to readers who are trying to make sense of these developments?
Dr. Amir Hosseini: I advise readers to stay informed through reliable and diverse news sources, as this ensures a well-rounded understanding of global events. It’s also essential to engage in discussions around international law and the principles of sovereignty, as these are fundamental in shaping policy and public opinion. understanding the historical context in which these conflicts occur can provide deeper insights into potential outcomes.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Hosseini, for your insightful analysis. It’s clear that the implications of the recent military strike will be felt far beyond the immediate region, and a careful examination of international laws and relations is more critical than ever.
Dr. Amir Hosseini: Thank you for the opportunity. It’s vital that we continue to discuss these issues constructively.