Cyber attack or misappropriation of information? Twenty-three million customer files of the Free operator would have been “hacked” (of which 5 million with the IBAN number of the attached bank account), the official version tells us, and the personal information contained therein would have been “hacked” and sold on the Dark Web. Another shot, therefore Lords of the Sith by Jean-François Copé and Co.
Seriously, wouldn’t it be possible that the content of these 23 million files, which has surely been deviated from its initial basis, consists of a new “card deal”?
However, everyone knows that with the omnipresence of computers everywhere in the lives of citizens, the current times are more recorded than ever, especially by the State, especially regarding political opinions.
I therefore insist: it would not be entirely possible that what the mainstream media sells to us in unison as a cyber attack carried out by “broom-cutting” hackers (Coluche), actually consists of a voluntary transmission to the French State, from Free (to free of charge or in exchange for any advantage for the company or its manager) of the personal data of its customers?
No because, sorry if I have a doubt, but some small technical details strongly oppose the validation of the official version of computer hacking.
In all the cities and countryside of France, the telephone network and the Internet are managed via relay cabinets. And, in each of these relay cabinets, there are three separate computer columns including Free, Orange and SFR. Therefore, to have access to network information (whatever the operator), not only is it necessary to have the computer key which, yes, can be obtained through the hacking of the same name, but it is also necessary to have the mechanical keys essential to open physically the relay cabinet.
The two operator columns are on the right and therefore the file data breach is on the left.
Who cares! The media and management of Free explain to us that the hacking of the data was carried out remotely, i.e. by hacking wizards. Gérard Majax from the Web.
Why not ? Moreover, even the media and public health explain to us in unison, with peremptory assertions, that the sudden deaths of athletes vaccinated “anti-covid” due to cardiac arrest, despite having increased sharply since the beginning of the vaccination campaign, compared to before (a period when almost no cases were recorded per year), they have absolutely no connection with the “anti-covid” vaccination. » Whether these cardiac arrests occur due to some smoking cause discovered for the occasion and reported by the media or a biological hack carried out by Mother Nature! The famous ”natural selection” so dear to these great humanists such as Bill Gates, Laurent Alexandre, Yuval Noah Harari and Co.
And above all! As in every telephone and Internet booth in France, there are computer columns of Free, Orange and SFR, if a relay is hacked, the three operators should be hacked together.
Consequently, if sooner or later we learned that the files of SFR and Orange customers were also hacked, we could have proof that the hacking of the files of Free customers was not in fact the work of a “hacker”, someone external to Free, but someone from Free, Orange or SFR, acting in simultaneous possession of the telephone operators’ IT keys and the mechanical keys to open the relay cabinets.
Duck!
This is the so-called “foot in the door” technique: once the door is locked in the open position (thanks to the foot in the door), it is simply a matter of time
Furthermore, a cybersecurity specialist reminded me that “ the vast majority of these attacks are carried out from within by employees or former employees who have an interest in taking action », which I was able to personally observe when I carried out security and intrusion tests on an online bank in the 2000s.
Furthermore, where does the sum of 165,000 euros come from which the media tell us is the sum for which the pseudo ”hacker” allegedly responsible for the remote computer hacking would have sold the personal data of Free customers “on the Dark Web”,? that is, a transaction in which the two protagonists (the hacker and the buyer), knowing they risk ten years of imprisonment and a fine of 150,000 euros, want to remain anonymous. But since they are mostly fools at heart, they informed the amount of this transaction to a certain person who works in a certain media outlet and who also prefers to remain anonymous. A conscientious investigator/journalist who, of course, as such, ensures that the information is 100% authentic.
Unless it is to certain bodies recognized by the Republic that the offender and/or the buyer of this personal information has provided the amount of his reprehensible transaction. In this case, it would in fact be possible, I fear, that, out of self-interested repentance or not (clemency of justice), or out of a patriotism as sudden as it was exacerbated (or even just to joke), they also provided this personal information to the government.
Because even though this information is already in the possession of the Treasury which deducts taxes from your bank account under a SEPA mandate, through this attack this provides a means to the government can scare the 23 million people affected. This is nothing new with the Covid crisis and, more recently, the thefts of computers from people working on security at the Olympic Games. There was a small wave, enough to approve some restrictive and liberticidal decisions, obviously.
Indeed, fear is an essential factor in dividing the masses and therefore controlling them. The famous “divide and conquer”. » And thanks to registration, those who resist the division will be victims in spite of themselves. That is, that their names could be thrown into the open, offered up for popular revenge. Moreover, with perfectly identified bank accounts, therefore with the associated telephone number and probably the email address.
YES! A perfectly identified bank account allows it to be blocked, citing any reason of opinion such as “incitement to hatred”, “anti-semitism”, “homophobia”, “racism”, “conspiracy”, etc.
This is a well-known Stalinist process, which unfortunately proved itself not only in the former Soviet Union, but also in the West, bringing together all the “democracies”.
We had the sad example of this in France, in particular, during the covid period, with the hunting of the unvaccinated and their stigmatization, and with the state and media persecution that continues today, against those who alerted the population to the side effects of the Vaccine. “vaccine.” This state persecution which has extended in 2022, with at least as much severity, to people who publicly contest the validity and legality of the material, pecuniary and military aid that France provides to Ukraine, and who question the actual use that is made of it concretelyof all these billions (38 in total, currently) taken from the people’s money for this official purpose, without the people having given their consent. The agreement stipulated that this gigantic sum could be used in this way legally. Constitutionally.
Already in the essential part of their enactment, these normative texts, which constitute the law in general and the Constitution in particular, are written in such a way that the executive power and justice can act against the interests of the people and in defiance of the principle of the Republic ”, Government of the people, for the people and by the people. “, which in these conditions has unfortunately been translated into practice for 56 years” Government of the people’s parasites, for the people’s parasites and through the people’s parasites. “, if in addition the executive power openly violates the Constitution, no: it’s too much!
The moment is now, we cannot go any further with the media, fiscal and judicial lynching of all those who, during this final count that I spoke to you about in different countries, the masks fall together -time and which -begins to -do-a lot, they will oppose its smooth development.
This is why at France-Soir we expect the worst.
But you know you can count on us to never give in to pressure.
Despite maneuvers and threats, we will continue to serve the truth!
And I would like to remind you that we are not the only ones to suffer attacks whose causes are questioned: the American elections are held under strict surveillance to avoid fraud, like those suspected in 2020, before being demonstrated in some states, while in Spain the rains torrential surges in Barcelona and Valencia revive all the speculation about their origins (Tatania Suckers he talks about it in a video: these floods really come at a time when a restructuring plan, published a few weeks ago, for agricultural companies in the Valencia region by Caixa Bank and validated by the government), France is suffering this security attack informatics!
H is enshrined in the French Constitution. The recent events, including the alleged cyber attack on Free, symbolize the broader concerns about authority, surveillance, and civil liberties in today’s society.
The notion that the incident might have been orchestrated not just as a mere hacking but potentially as a means for state apparatus to exert control over the population is alarming. It echoes historical patterns where crises are exploited to justify restrictive measures, ultimately detracting from citizen freedoms under the guise of safety or public interest.
To assert that this is merely a technological issue mishandled by a telecommunications company, rather than a political maneuver, risks oversimplifying the complexities at play. Government agencies and media narratives have the power to shape perception and influence the reactions of the population. This triangulation of interests—between corporations, governments, and the media—could lead to scenarios whereby individuals find themselves increasingly scrutinized and controlled, often under the pretext of national security or public health.
As we assess this particular event, it is crucial to remain vigilant. We must question the information presented to us and consider the implications of such data breaches not just on individuals but on the collective society’s trust in institutions. The rise of fear tactics, scapegoating, and the chilling effect on dissenting voices are all strategies that have historically been deployed when the status quo feels threatened.
The current environment thus raises essential questions about the very nature of freedom and governance. Are we witnessing the gradual erosion of rights under the pretext of security? How does one reconcile the ideals of democracy and civil liberties with the realities of a surveillance state? These inquiries are not merely academic; they are urgent and necessary as we navigate an increasingly complex digital landscape where personal data has become not just a commodity but a tool of control. As citizens, it is our responsibility to engage critically with these questions, advocating for transparency, accountability, and the safeguarding of our rights against encroaching authoritarianism in all its forms.