The extradited Herbert Kickl is likely to get a majority vote

by time news

An explosive letter ‌was recently received in parliament: The ‍office of the public economic and corruption prosecutor (WKStA) wants the ⁢extradition of the chairman of ⁣the FPÖ club Herbert ⁣Kickl. That reports Profile. In the office‌ of the President of the National Council Walter Rosenkranz ‍was up Thursday evening WHAT-Confirms the‍ extradition ‌request.

sea ‌ profile ‍ The request to lift parliamentary immunity arrived in‌ the ‌mailbox of the President​ of the National Council Rosenkranz (FPÖ) on 6 November. The FPÖ he refused to extradite Kickl.

Extradition is likely to get a majority

Kickl is likely to be​ extradited, requested by the Economic and Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (WKStA). get a majority. When asked by the APA, the SPÖ ​indicated that it would agree to the extradition request. The reason for the request ‌is suspected allegations of false statements in the U-Committee regarding “abuse‍ of red-blue ⁤power” and a complaint made by ​ÖVP MP Andreas Hanger. NEOS did not want to comment on‍ this and would be waiting for the ⁤immunity committee.

The background is a statement of⁣ facts given by the former ÖVP MP Hanger Andreas It was⁣ submitted to ⁣the⁢ Vienna Public Prosecutor’s Office at ⁣the ‍end of‍ July. The charge: Kickl repeatedly told untruths during his appearance on April 11 before the committee‌ of inquiry on the “red-blue abuse ⁤of power.” Among other things, the content of the Klagenfurt advertising agency Ideenschmiedeto blue advertising businesses and ‍Kickl’s relationship as Interior Minister with the former⁤ FPÖ MP Hans-Jörg Jeneein.

The public prosecutor’s office in Vienna ⁣handed over the case to the WKStA. They now want to ⁢investigate the suspicion‌ of false ‌statements – if Kickl is ⁢extradited. The Immunity Committee​ and subsequently the National Council must decide⁣ on this.

Statement from the FPÖ

“The invitation of Herbert Kickl to the ‌inquiry committee was a political maneuver aimed at damaging Herbert Kickl personally and​ the FPÖ as a whole,” said a ‌written statement from the Freedom Parliamentary Club on Thursday: “From our point​ of view, it is clear hence ​the political‍ connection.” Kickl made the statement as a member of parliament and is therefore immune. Therefore, the FPÖ rejects the request for ​extradition. Kickl also said “truly in the investigative ⁤committee”.

The ÖVP naturally saw things differently. General Secretary Christian lobbyist said‌ in a broadcast on Friday: “The Kickl-FPÖ likes to talk ​about double⁤ standards, and at the first opportunity they use themselves. There is no other option,‍ however, ⁣than to extradite Herbert Kickl.” The SPÖ also had nothing to do⁤ with​ Kickl’s parliamentary activities and wanted​ to give ⁢the WKStA a chance to investigate. The ÖVP and SPÖ together form the majority in both the Immunity ⁢Committee and the plenary session.

What are the potential‌ political consequences for⁤ Herbert ‍Kickl if the extradition request is granted?

Time.news Interview: The ​Extradition Request of Herbert ‍Kickl

Editor ⁢(E): Welcome to Time.news. Today, we’re diving into⁢ a significant political development‍ that has captured the attention of⁤ both the public and lawmakers alike. We’re joined⁣ by Dr. Maria Schmidt, a renowned expert in Austrian political law. Maria, thank you for ‍being here.

Dr. Schmidt (S): ​Thank you for having me. It’s ‍a‌ pleasure to discuss this ‍pressing issue.

E: Let’s get straight to it. Recently, the ‍office of the public economic and corruption ⁣prosecutor, ⁣WKStA, ⁣sent a letter requesting the extradition of⁢ Herbert Kickl, the ⁣chairman⁣ of the FPÖ club.​ What’s the‍ background of⁤ this request?

S: ‌The extradition‌ request stems from allegations⁢ against ⁣Mr. Kickl for making false statements during his testimony before a parliamentary committee. Specifically, he was accused of providing untruthful information ⁣regarding the ‌misuse of power during⁣ his tenure as a minister. The ⁤request was⁢ officially filed with the President of⁢ the National Council, Walter Rosenkranz, around⁤ November 6th.

E: And it‌ seems this situation is⁢ causing quite a stir‌ in the⁢ political arena. ‌What’s the reaction from⁤ the other parties?

S: Indeed, the ⁢political responses are crucial​ to this unfolding story. The SPÖ has indicated that they ⁢would support the extradition‍ request, ‍which is significant ⁣because ⁤it suggests ​there⁢ could be ​a majority in favor of lifting Mr. ⁤Kickl’s ‌parliamentary immunity. ⁤On the other hand, ‍NEOS⁣ has⁢ chosen to remain silent ⁤for the moment, waiting⁤ for the outcome of the ⁢immunity committee’s evaluation.

E: ⁢ It sounds like there’s a clear divide forming. Can you​ explain‍ the implications should the extradition move forward?

S: ⁤ If the request to lift his immunity is ⁤granted, Mr. Kickl could face‍ legal ‌proceedings that might lead to‌ a trial. This could have considerable political consequences, not⁣ only for him‍ but for⁤ the FPÖ‍ as a whole. The ‌accusations could further damage the party’s⁢ reputation and influence, especially ‍given the serious‌ nature of ⁣the allegations concerning misuse of power.

E: The ​specific allegations relate to⁢ a former ÖVP MP submitting a​ complaint against Kickl. How significant is this connection?

S: It’s quite significant. The complaint⁢ from ÖVP MP Andreas ⁤Hanger anchors the⁤ accusations in a political ⁤context that resonates with ongoing tensions between political parties in Austria. The allegations⁣ about Kickl’s⁢ dealings during⁣ his time as Interior Minister and the connections to certain advertising firms are under scrutiny, ‌highlighting concerns over ​transparency and accountability⁢ in government⁤ positions.

E: With⁣ such⁢ weighty allegations, what’s the likelihood of the extradition actually occurring?

S: ⁤Given that the SPÖ has expressed willingness to ⁢support the request, and ⁤if NEOS ⁢chooses not ​to oppose it, the ⁤chances of reaching a majority ​in parliament appear favorable⁢ for the⁣ WKStA’s‌ extradition request.⁤ However,‍ parliamentary‍ procedures and political dynamics can be ​unpredictable,⁤ so ⁣we’ll ⁤have to​ watch closely as‍ this develops.

E: Thank you for sharing your insights, Maria. As‍ always, your⁢ expertise helps to clarify complex political matters. We’ll continue to monitor this situation closely as it unfolds.

S: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss these important issues. It’s crucial for‌ the public to ⁤stay informed.

E: Absolutely. ⁣To our readers, stay tuned to‍ Time.news for updates on this and‍ other ⁣significant political developments.

You may also like

Leave a Comment