The Prosecutor’s Office revealed new details of the investigation against Jorge Valdivia, who this Thursday returned to the Rancagua Prison.
After the Court again issued preventive detention for Jorge Valdiviaa new precedent emerged in the framework of the investigation for two complaints of rapewhich has to do with the results of one of the toxicological examinations of the victims.
In that line, the head of legal advice of the Eastern Prosecutor’s Office, Pamela Valdés confirmed to ADN Radio that one of the complainants presented positive results to the presence of benzodiazepinewhose substance would not have been consumed voluntarily.
“A has already arrived toxicological test that was positive regarding a substance, benzodiazepine,” said Valdés.
This substance is known for its sedative and anxiolytic effectswhich could explain the vulnerability that the victim accused.“We are expanding expert reports to determine the effects of this substance in combination with alcohol. Considering that the victims were of small build,” said the representative of the Eastern Prosecutor’s Office.
With the result that showed the presence of benzodiazepine, the thesis of the Prosecutor’s Office is reaffirmed in relation to the inability of the complainants to oppose, an vital point in the rape investigation against Jorge Valdivia.
“Both victims say they have entirely lost the ability to resist or respond. It is evident that this exceeds the common effects of alcohol,” he said.
The “modus operandi” of Jorge Valdivia
Although the Magician’s defense has maintained that the sexual relations that the former soccer player had with the complainants occurred consensually, the toxicological results and the statements that have been presented in the case have caused this version to be called into question..
In this sense, the public Ministry stressed that in both complaints Valdivia had used the same modus operandi: contact with the victims through social networks, alcohol consumption and WhatsApp messages that would confirm lack of consent.
“He contacts victims through a social network, Instagram, at both. There is no prior relationship. They have no friends in common. The victims are not known. “In both victims there was alcohol consumption, and both reported the possibility of having been drugged.”he detailed.
In this context,Pamela Valdés commented that they are awaiting the result of the toxicological examination of the second complainant.
“There is still an expansion of the report that we are going to request. Let the expert explain to us what these substances are.. What effects do they have on the body, and moast importantly, what happens with this combination“, closed the prosecutor’s advisor.
How do public perceptions of law enforcement change in response to notable investigations?
Sure! Here’s a fictional interview between a Time.news editor and an expert based on the topic of a recent investigation by the Prosecutor’s Office:
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news. Today, we have the privilege of speaking with Dr. Emily Harper, a criminal justice expert and former prosecutor. Dr. Harper, thank you for joining us!
Dr.Emily Harper: Thank you for having me! It’s great to be here.
Editor: As you might know, the Prosecutor’s Office recently unveiled new details regarding a high-profile investigation. Can you provide context on why this case is particularly significant?
Dr. Harper: Absolutely. This case has drawn a lot of public attention due to its implications for law enforcement practices and the judicial system. The sheer complexity of the investigation, plus the involvement of key public figures, makes it a landmark moment in criminal justice that might set precedents for how similar cases are handled in the future.
editor: There have been revelations about the methods used during the investigation. Can you shed some light on this?
Dr. Harper: Sure! The Prosecutor’s Office is utilizing advanced forensic techniques that demonstrate an evolution in investigative methods. The importance of technology, such as data analytics and digital forensics, showcases how investigators are leaving no stone unturned. Though, it also raises questions about privacy and the legal boundaries of such methods.
Editor: That’s a great point.Do you think the public is aware of these investigative techniques, and do you believe there is a concern regarding their implications?
Dr. Harper: While some people are aware, I think there’s a lack of understanding about how these techniques can impact civil liberties. The use of technology must be balanced with protections for individual rights.Increased transparency in these processes is crucial to maintaining public trust.
Editor: Looking forward, how do you see this case influencing public opinion on the judicial system and law enforcement?
Dr.Harper: This case has the potential to either reinforce faith in the judicial system or exacerbate distrust, depending on how it unfolds. If the investigation is thorough and leads to accountability, it could enhance public trust. Conversely, any signs of misconduct or lack of due process could further alienate communities from law enforcement.
Editor: Lastly, what message do you hope the public takes away from the developments in this investigation?
Dr. Harper: I hope the public recognizes the importance of due process and the role they play in holding institutions accountable. It’s vital for citizens to stay informed and engaged. This case is an opportunity for dialog about justice, equity, and the rule of law. We need to advocate for a system that works for everyone.
Editor: Thank you,Dr. Harper. Your insights are invaluable, and it’s clear that this investigation will be closely watched. We appreciate your time and expertise today.
Dr. Harper: thank you for having me. I’m looking forward to seeing how this develops.
This structure provides a complete and engaging dialogue inspired by the implications of a detailed investigation, capturing the blend of technical and societal concerns surrounding it.