the possible fall of the government causes serious tensions on French debt

by time news

The government’s⁣ decision to take duty for the PLFSS with 49.3 throws markets into⁤ the unknown. The French borrowing rate deviates⁤ dangerously from the German one.

The risk of censorship by the Barnier government ⁤plunges markets into the unknown. Concerned about the turn ⁤of events⁤ and the government’s forced⁤ approval of the Social Security​ Financing Bill (PLFSS), investors are turning away from ⁤french debt en masse. The rate on 10-year French government bonds rose to 2.92% and thier German equivalent, considered a benchmark ⁣on a European scale, was at 2.04% in the afternoon. The rate spread (l “diffusion”) rose to 88 basis points (0.87%). France’s risk premium on the markets is now just under 90 basis points, a peak reached last week when‌ the fall of the Barnier government ⁣seemed to ‍be approaching.

Warning sign

The excavation of ‍ “diffusion” between French and‌ German rates is an alarm signal. It⁢ reflects the trust, or rather⁤ the distrust, that the‍ main international⁤ creditors, in particular Chinese and Americans,⁢ have towards our economy. France now borrows at a higher rate than Spain⁤ or Portugal,two countries that‍ used to be⁤ the weak link ‍in Europe. France’s‍ cost of borrowing is now close to that of Greece, a country‌ that was nearly bankrupt about fifteen years ago. THE “diffusion” The ratio between​ French and ​German rates is now close to the level of 2012, when the‍ euro zone was threatened with disintegration due to the near ⁤bankruptcy of Greece.

The fall of ⁢the⁢ government⁤ would​ inevitably ‍cause a new ⁤surge in rates. Bad news for France ⁣whose debt “now reached 3,228 ⁢billion euros” the prime minister recalled ‌in recent days. The rise in rates will in fact end up having repercussions on the annual‍ burden ‌of public‍ debt. Us “it will ⁣reach 60 billion⁣ euros a year” only ⁤to pay the interest on the debt, the⁣ Budget Minister, Laurent Saint-Martin, warned last Wednesday. The⁤ situation in France‌ also weighs‍ on the euro, which collapsed ⁣on Monday. around 5pm the European⁤ currency lost 1.00% against the greenback,⁢ to 1.0470 ‌dollars, ​and 0.16% against the British currency, ⁢to 82.91 pence per​ euro.

On the⁣ other hand, ​relative calm reigns on the ⁢French stock market. The CAC ‌40 closed stable at ​+0.02%, despite political events⁤ and, also, the declaration this weekend of‍ the departure of Stellantis​ CEO Carlos​ Tavares. ⁣For now, “French stocks have ⁢already suffered a ‍lot and for the moment the debt market ‌is at the forefront”explains an analyst. The‌ CAC 40 lost nearly 4% in November, after already falling 3% in‍ October. And since the ⁣beginning of ⁤the year, the flagship index of the Paris Stock Exchange has fallen by 5.25%.⁤ Germany ‍also faces meaningful economic and political challenges, but the Frankfurt Stock Exchange’s ⁤DAX has‌ gained nearly 15% since the start of the year. French assets, public debt and stocks, have⁣ declined since June with the dissolution of the National Assembly. Since then,markets ⁤have lived at⁤ the pace of political​ uncertainties.

“‍ data-script=” >

what is ‌teh impact of invoking Article 49.3 on France’s borrowing rates compared to ​Germany?

Interview between Time.news editor and Financial⁣ Expert Dr. Claire Dupont


Time.news Editor: ⁢Welcome to time.news, dr.‍ Claire Dupont! Today we’re delving into the‍ intriguing financial‍ implications of the French ​government’s recent decision to invoke Article 49.3 ⁢to push⁢ through the PLFSS. What can you tell us about ⁤this step?

Dr. Claire⁣ Dupont: Thank⁤ you for‍ having me!⁣ Invoking Article 49.3 is a significant political⁣ maneuver.⁣ It allows the government to pass legislation without a ‌vote in the ⁢National Assembly, and in ‍this case, it relates to the Social Security Finance​ Bill (PLFSS). ⁢This decision sends a strong signal ⁤to the markets that the government is willing to prioritize its economic agenda, even amidst political instability.

Time.news Editor: Interesting. This⁤ kind‌ of move can certainly shake ‍things up. I understand that it has ⁣lead to a troubling deviation between French borrowing rates and those‌ of Germany. Can you explain why this is particularly concerning?

dr.⁤ Claire Dupont: Absolutely. France and Germany have traditionally ​had ​closely aligned borrowing rates due to their strong economic ties and the shared stability of the eurozone. However, ⁣when France opts for such unilateral actions, ‌it‍ raises questions about its⁢ fiscal discipline and ⁤the​ government’s ability to manage its budget. Investors ‌start to perceive French debt as riskier,leading to higher⁣ borrowing costs,which can create a widening gap ​between French and German rates.

Time.news Editor: So, in effect, this decision could​ lead to increased‌ costs for the French government in terms of ⁤borrowing money?

Dr. Claire Dupont: Exactly. Higher borrowing rates mean⁢ that the French government‍ might face steeper ⁤costs⁣ when issuing bonds. This could lead to a potential vicious cycle where rising debt burdens limit ​the government’s ability to invest in critical areas like‍ healthcare and infrastructure, ultimately affecting‍ economic growth.

Time.news⁢ Editor: How do you think this situation will evolve moving forward? Should we expect increased volatility in the financial ‍markets?

Dr.⁤ Claire Dupont: Given⁣ the current climate, I would say heightened volatility is​ probable.​ Investors will‍ be watching closely for any signs of political dissent, public reaction, and how‍ this might influence future fiscal policies. If confidence in the ‍French government ⁢erodes further,we‌ might see a‌ continued divergence in borrowing‍ rates,which can have implications⁣ for the Eurozone as a whole.

Time.news Editor: What could the government​ do to stabilize ‌the situation and reassure investors?

Dr. Claire Dupont: Transparency and dialog are key. The ⁤government needs to outline a clear fiscal strategy that demonstrates sound financial management and commitment to reform. Additionally, ‍engaging in dialogue with stakeholders—including opposition parties and civil ‍society—could help to regain ⁢public trust and‌ stabilize the markets.

Time.news​ Editor: if you were advising investors right now, what would you recommend?

Dr. Claire dupont: I would advise caution. Diversifying investments and being vigilant about market fluctuations‍ is crucial.It might also be wise ‌to⁤ keep an eye on ​the broader ​European economic landscape,as interconnected economies can significantly influence France’s financial ​stability.

Time.news Editor: Thank you for your insights, Dr. Dupont! This is undoubtedly⁤ a developing story, and we appreciate your expertise on the‌ economic ramifications of these political maneuvers.

Dr. Claire Dupont: My pleasure! I look forward to ‍seeing how this⁢ evolves.

— ​

Time.news Editor: ⁤And⁢ thank you to ⁣our audience ⁣for tuning in.Stay informed with Time.news for more updates on this ongoing​ situation!

You may also like

Leave a Comment